The Need to Move from Describing to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Indigenous Drug and Alcohol Residential Rehabilitation Services: A Systematic Review.

Doug James, Anthony Shakeshaft, Alice Munro, Ryan J Courtney
{"title":"The Need to Move from Describing to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Indigenous Drug and Alcohol Residential Rehabilitation Services: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Doug James,&nbsp;Anthony Shakeshaft,&nbsp;Alice Munro,&nbsp;Ryan J Courtney","doi":"10.2174/1874473711666180404123904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite the importance of Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation, the knowledge supporting these services is limited. This paper aims to: (i) identify the research output related to Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation services; (ii) classify identified studies according to their methodology; and (iii) describe key characteristics of clients and services, and critique the research methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA compliant search of 10 electronic databases for studies of Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation services from Australia, United States, Canada and New Zealand, published between 1 January 2000 and 28 March 2016, was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 38 relevant studies, 20 were service descriptions, one was a thesis, 16 described treatment or client characteristics and one was a pre/post evaluation. No systematic reviews or the development or evaluation of measures was identified, with reviewed studies found to be of relatively low methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are few published studies on Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation services, an average of one paper per annum internationally, and only one treatment outcome evaluation. Three key features of the reviewed papers included (i) studied services were mostly located in regional areas; (ii) services provided multi-component programs, with little alignment between the models of care of other services; and (iii) the majority used qualitative, rather than quantitative methods. Client outcomes will likely improve if future research can establish best-practice, culturally acceptable models of care and increase the application of evidence-based, culturally validated quantitative evaluation measures to complement existing qualitative research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72730,"journal":{"name":"Current drug abuse reviews","volume":"10 1","pages":"52-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug abuse reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473711666180404123904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite the importance of Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation, the knowledge supporting these services is limited. This paper aims to: (i) identify the research output related to Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation services; (ii) classify identified studies according to their methodology; and (iii) describe key characteristics of clients and services, and critique the research methods.

Methods: A PRISMA compliant search of 10 electronic databases for studies of Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation services from Australia, United States, Canada and New Zealand, published between 1 January 2000 and 28 March 2016, was conducted.

Results: Of the 38 relevant studies, 20 were service descriptions, one was a thesis, 16 described treatment or client characteristics and one was a pre/post evaluation. No systematic reviews or the development or evaluation of measures was identified, with reviewed studies found to be of relatively low methodological quality.

Conclusion: There are few published studies on Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation services, an average of one paper per annum internationally, and only one treatment outcome evaluation. Three key features of the reviewed papers included (i) studied services were mostly located in regional areas; (ii) services provided multi-component programs, with little alignment between the models of care of other services; and (iii) the majority used qualitative, rather than quantitative methods. Client outcomes will likely improve if future research can establish best-practice, culturally acceptable models of care and increase the application of evidence-based, culturally validated quantitative evaluation measures to complement existing qualitative research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从描述到评估本土药物和酒精住院康复服务有效性的需要:系统回顾。
背景和目标:尽管土著吸毒和酗酒者的住院康复很重要,但支持这些服务的知识有限。本文旨在:(i)确定与土著吸毒和酗酒住院康复服务有关的研究成果;(ii)根据研究方法对已确定的研究进行分类;(iii)描述客户和服务的关键特征,并批评研究方法。方法:对2000年1月1日至2016年3月28日期间发表的来自澳大利亚、美国、加拿大和新西兰的土著毒品和酒精住院康复服务研究的10个电子数据库进行了符合PRISMA标准的检索。结果:在38项相关研究中,20项是服务描述,1项是论文,16项描述治疗或客户特征,1项是前后评估。未发现系统评价或制定或评价措施,经评价的研究发现方法学质量相对较低。结论:关于土著吸毒和酗酒住院康复服务的已发表研究很少,国际上平均每年只有一篇论文,只有一篇治疗结果评价。经审查的论文的三个主要特点包括:(i)研究的服务大多位于区域地区;(ii)提供多组件方案的服务,与其他服务的护理模式之间几乎没有一致性;(三)大多数使用定性方法,而不是定量方法。如果未来的研究能够建立最佳实践、文化上可接受的护理模式,并增加循证、文化上有效的定量评估措施的应用,以补充现有的定性研究,客户的结果可能会得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface. Meet Our Editor-in-Chief Proceeding of the 8th Alcohol Hangover Research Group Meeting. Development of a Definition for the Alcohol Hangover: Consumer Descriptions and Expert Consensus. A Review of the Physiological Factors Associated with Alcohol Hangover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1