Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis International Pub Date : 2018-03-12 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/7835952
Mireille Neuhaus, Pasquale Calabrese, Jean-Marie Annoni
{"title":"Decision-Making in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mireille Neuhaus,&nbsp;Pasquale Calabrese,&nbsp;Jean-Marie Annoni","doi":"10.1155/2018/7835952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is frequently associated with cognitive and behavioural deficits. A growing number of studies suggest an impact of MS on decision-making abilities. The aim of this systematic review was to assess if (1) performance of MS patients in decision-making tasks was consistently different from controls and (2) whether this modification was associated with cognitive dysfunction and emotional alterations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was conducted on Pubmed/Medline database. 12 studies evaluating the difference between MS patients and healthy controls using validated decision-making tasks were included. Outcomes considered were quantitative (net scores) and qualitative measurements (deliberation time and learning from feedback).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative and qualitative decision-making impairment in MS was present in 64.7% of measurements. Patients were equally impaired in tasks for decision-making under risk and ambiguity. A correlation to other cognitive functions was present in 50% of cases, with the highest associations in the domains of processing speed and attentional capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In MS patients, qualitative and quantitative modifications may be present in any kind of decision-making task and can appear independently of other cognitive measures. Since decision-making abilities have a significant impact on everyday life, this cognitive aspect has an influential importance in various MS-related treatment settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46096,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"7835952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7835952","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7835952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is frequently associated with cognitive and behavioural deficits. A growing number of studies suggest an impact of MS on decision-making abilities. The aim of this systematic review was to assess if (1) performance of MS patients in decision-making tasks was consistently different from controls and (2) whether this modification was associated with cognitive dysfunction and emotional alterations.

Methods: The search was conducted on Pubmed/Medline database. 12 studies evaluating the difference between MS patients and healthy controls using validated decision-making tasks were included. Outcomes considered were quantitative (net scores) and qualitative measurements (deliberation time and learning from feedback).

Results: Quantitative and qualitative decision-making impairment in MS was present in 64.7% of measurements. Patients were equally impaired in tasks for decision-making under risk and ambiguity. A correlation to other cognitive functions was present in 50% of cases, with the highest associations in the domains of processing speed and attentional capacity.

Conclusions: In MS patients, qualitative and quantitative modifications may be present in any kind of decision-making task and can appear independently of other cognitive measures. Since decision-making abilities have a significant impact on everyday life, this cognitive aspect has an influential importance in various MS-related treatment settings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症患者的决策:一项系统综述。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)通常与认知和行为缺陷有关。越来越多的研究表明多发性硬化症对决策能力有影响。本系统综述的目的是评估(1)MS患者在决策任务中的表现是否始终与对照组不同,(2)这种改变是否与认知功能障碍和情绪改变有关。方法:在Pubmed/Medline数据库进行检索。纳入了12项研究,评估了MS患者与健康对照之间使用验证决策任务的差异。考虑的结果是定量(净得分)和定性测量(审议时间和从反馈中学习)。结果:64.7%的测量结果显示MS存在定量和定性决策障碍。患者在风险和模糊性下的决策任务中同样受损。与其他认知功能的相关性在50%的案例中存在,在处理速度和注意力能力领域的相关性最高。结论:在MS患者中,定性和定量的改变可能存在于任何一种决策任务中,并且可以独立于其他认知测量而出现。由于决策能力对日常生活有重大影响,因此认知方面在各种ms相关治疗环境中具有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis International
Multiple Sclerosis International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of multiple sclerosis, including clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, therapeutics, genetics, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, psychology and neurorehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
White Matter Lesion Volumes on 3-T MRI in People With MS Who Had Followed a Diet and Lifestyle Program for More Than 10 Years. Pulp Sensitivity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease Duration and Sensory/Motor Associations-A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Atrophy as an Outcome of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Remitting-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Contributors of Backward Walking in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Physical Therapy for Walking Difficulties in Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1