Secondary traumatic stress among victim advocates: prevalence and correlates.

Lorraine T Benuto, Rory Newlands, Allison Ruork, Sierra Hooft, Andrew Ahrendt
{"title":"Secondary traumatic stress among victim advocates: prevalence and correlates.","authors":"Lorraine T Benuto,&nbsp;Rory Newlands,&nbsp;Allison Ruork,&nbsp;Sierra Hooft,&nbsp;Andrew Ahrendt","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2018.1474825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS) among victim advocates and to determine if risk factors (for the development of STS) that have been cited in the literature (with other populations) are applicable to victim advocates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected from 135 victim advocates using an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence rate of STS among victim advocates is approximately 50% and risk factors include number of hours worked per week, direct service hours, and working with adult survivors of child sexual abuse.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results suggest that cumulative trauma exposure acts as risk factors to the development of STS among victim advocates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intervention efforts for this population are sorely needed and the information gained from this study can be used to guide these intervention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 5","pages":"494-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2018.1474825","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1474825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS) among victim advocates and to determine if risk factors (for the development of STS) that have been cited in the literature (with other populations) are applicable to victim advocates.

Methods: Data was collected from 135 victim advocates using an online survey.

Results: The prevalence rate of STS among victim advocates is approximately 50% and risk factors include number of hours worked per week, direct service hours, and working with adult survivors of child sexual abuse.

Discussion: Our results suggest that cumulative trauma exposure acts as risk factors to the development of STS among victim advocates.

Conclusion: Intervention efforts for this population are sorely needed and the information gained from this study can be used to guide these intervention efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受害者倡导中的继发性创伤压力:患病率和相关性。
目的:本研究的目的是确定继发性创伤应激(STS)在受害者维权人士中的患病率,并确定文献中(与其他人群)引用的(导致STS发展的)风险因素是否适用于受害者维权人士。方法:采用在线调查的方式,对135名受害者维权人士进行调查。结果:受害者倡导者中STS的患病率约为50%,风险因素包括每周工作时数,直接服务时数以及与儿童性虐待的成年幸存者一起工作。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,累积的创伤暴露是受害者倡导者发展STS的危险因素。结论:对该人群的干预工作是迫切需要的,本研究获得的信息可用于指导这些干预工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freeing Chinese Abused Women From Stereotype: A Pretest-Posttest Comparison Study on Group Intervention in Refuge Centers. Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study. Toward evidence-based anti-human trafficking policy: a rapid review of CSE rehabilitation and evaluation of Indian legislation. Developing your communication skills in social work. The new social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1