Laparoscopic Choledochotomy in a Solitary Common Duct Stone: A Prospective Study.

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Surgery Pub Date : 2018-05-14 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8080625
K B Deo, S Adhikary, S Khaniya, V C Shakya, C S Agrawal
{"title":"Laparoscopic Choledochotomy in a Solitary Common Duct Stone: A Prospective Study.","authors":"K B Deo,&nbsp;S Adhikary,&nbsp;S Khaniya,&nbsp;V C Shakya,&nbsp;C S Agrawal","doi":"10.1155/2018/8080625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has all the advantages of minimal access and is also the most cost effective compared to the other options.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study a profile on laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for a single common duct stone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 consecutive patients with solitary common bile duct stone attending our hospital over a period of one year were enrolled in the study. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was done by transductal route in all the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 18 females and 12 males with age ranging from 28 to 75 years. Jaundice was present in 12 (40%) patients. Twenty-four (80%) patients had raised alkaline phosphatase. The mean size of CBD on ultrasound was 11.55 mm. The mean size of calculus was 11.06 mm and was located in the distal CBD in 26 (86.7%) patients. The mean operative time was 158.4 ± 57.89 min. There were 8 (26.6%) conversions to open procedure. T-tube was used in 26 (86.7%) patients. The postoperative complications were hospital acquired chest infection in 3 (10%), surgical site infection in 3 (10%), acute coronary syndrome in one (3.3%), and bile leak after T-tube removal in one (3.3%) patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is an effective, safe management of common bile duct stone.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2018 ","pages":"8080625"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8080625","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8080625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has all the advantages of minimal access and is also the most cost effective compared to the other options.

Objective: To study a profile on laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for a single common duct stone.

Methods: A total of 30 consecutive patients with solitary common bile duct stone attending our hospital over a period of one year were enrolled in the study. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was done by transductal route in all the patients.

Results: There were 18 females and 12 males with age ranging from 28 to 75 years. Jaundice was present in 12 (40%) patients. Twenty-four (80%) patients had raised alkaline phosphatase. The mean size of CBD on ultrasound was 11.55 mm. The mean size of calculus was 11.06 mm and was located in the distal CBD in 26 (86.7%) patients. The mean operative time was 158.4 ± 57.89 min. There were 8 (26.6%) conversions to open procedure. T-tube was used in 26 (86.7%) patients. The postoperative complications were hospital acquired chest infection in 3 (10%), surgical site infection in 3 (10%), acute coronary syndrome in one (3.3%), and bile leak after T-tube removal in one (3.3%) patient.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is an effective, safe management of common bile duct stone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单独胆总管结石的腹腔镜胆总管切开术:一项前瞻性研究。
背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查具有最小通路的所有优点,与其他选择相比也是最经济有效的。目的:探讨腹腔镜下胆总管探查单纯性胆总管结石的方法。方法:选取我院住院1年内连续30例单纯性胆总管结石患者作为研究对象。所有患者均经转导路径行腹腔镜胆总管探查。结果:女性18例,男性12例,年龄28 ~ 75岁。12例(40%)患者出现黄疸。24例(80%)患者碱性磷酸酶升高。超声显示CBD平均大小为11.55 mm。结石的平均大小为11.06 mm, 26例(86.7%)患者位于CBD远端。平均手术时间158.4±57.89 min。8例(26.6%)转为开放式手术。26例(86.7%)患者使用t管。术后并发症为医院获得性胸部感染3例(10%),手术部位感染3例(10%),急性冠状动脉综合征1例(3.3%),t管拔除后胆漏1例(3.3%)。结论:腹腔镜胆总管探查是治疗胆总管结石有效、安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Mortality and Postoperative Complications Between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An Umbrella Review. Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Nephroureterectomy without Intraoperative Repositioning Using a New Robotic Surgical System (KD-SR-01TM). Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Gastrectomy in Patients with Situs Inversus Totalis: A Systematic Review. Clinical Factors to Predict Difficult Ureter during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1