Evaluation of the impact of body mass index on warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients.

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2018-08-01 Epub Date: 2018-06-19 DOI:10.1177/1753944718781295
Katie B Tellor, Steffany N Nguyen, Amanda C Bultas, Anastasia L Armbruster, Nicholas A Greenwald, Abigail M Yancey
{"title":"Evaluation of the impact of body mass index on warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients.","authors":"Katie B Tellor,&nbsp;Steffany N Nguyen,&nbsp;Amanda C Bultas,&nbsp;Anastasia L Armbruster,&nbsp;Nicholas A Greenwald,&nbsp;Abigail M Yancey","doi":"10.1177/1753944718781295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite well established empiric dose adjustments for drug and disease-state interactions, the impact of body mass index (BM) on warfarin remains unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients, stratified by BMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review included two cohorts of patients: cohort A (patients admitted with a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR)) and cohort B (newly initiated on warfarin during hospitalization). Exclusion criteria included: age under 18 years, pregnancy, INR (goal 2.5-3.5), and warfarin thromboprophylaxis post orthopedic surgery. The primary outcome was mean total weekly dose (TWD) of warfarin based on weight classification: underweight (BMI <18 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), normal/overweight (BMI 18-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and morbidly obese (BMI ⩾ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Data were extracted from two community hospitals in reverse chronologic order during July 2015-June 2013 until both study institutions evaluated 100 patients per cohort in each BMI classification or until all patients had been evaluated within the prespecified timeframe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 585 patients were included in cohort A (26 underweight, 200 normal/overweight, 200 obese, 159 morbidly obese). There was a statistically significant difference in TWD as determined by one-way analysis of variance ( p < 0.05). A Tukey post hoc test revealed a statistically significantly higher TWD in morbidly obese (41.5 mg) compared with underweight (25.6 mg, p < 0.05), normal/overweight (28.8 mg, p < 0.05) and obese patients (32.4 mg, p < 0.05). In cohort B, 379 patients were evaluated (9 underweight, 166 normal/overweight, 152 obese, 52 morbidly obese). Overall, 191 patients had a therapeutic INR on discharge (88.9% underweight, 52.4% normal/overweight, 44.1% obese, 55.8% morbidly obese, p = 0.035). Of those, there was a statistically significant difference in TWD ( p = 0.021) with a higher TWD in the morbidly obese (41 mg) compared with underweight patients (24.4 mg, p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of this study, morbidly obese patients may require higher TWD to obtain and maintain a therapeutic INR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23035,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"12 8","pages":"207-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753944718781295","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944718781295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Despite well established empiric dose adjustments for drug and disease-state interactions, the impact of body mass index (BM) on warfarin remains unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients, stratified by BMI.

Methods: This retrospective review included two cohorts of patients: cohort A (patients admitted with a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR)) and cohort B (newly initiated on warfarin during hospitalization). Exclusion criteria included: age under 18 years, pregnancy, INR (goal 2.5-3.5), and warfarin thromboprophylaxis post orthopedic surgery. The primary outcome was mean total weekly dose (TWD) of warfarin based on weight classification: underweight (BMI <18 kg/m2), normal/overweight (BMI 18-29.9 kg/m2), obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (BMI ⩾ 40 kg/m2). Data were extracted from two community hospitals in reverse chronologic order during July 2015-June 2013 until both study institutions evaluated 100 patients per cohort in each BMI classification or until all patients had been evaluated within the prespecified timeframe.

Results: A total of 585 patients were included in cohort A (26 underweight, 200 normal/overweight, 200 obese, 159 morbidly obese). There was a statistically significant difference in TWD as determined by one-way analysis of variance ( p < 0.05). A Tukey post hoc test revealed a statistically significantly higher TWD in morbidly obese (41.5 mg) compared with underweight (25.6 mg, p < 0.05), normal/overweight (28.8 mg, p < 0.05) and obese patients (32.4 mg, p < 0.05). In cohort B, 379 patients were evaluated (9 underweight, 166 normal/overweight, 152 obese, 52 morbidly obese). Overall, 191 patients had a therapeutic INR on discharge (88.9% underweight, 52.4% normal/overweight, 44.1% obese, 55.8% morbidly obese, p = 0.035). Of those, there was a statistically significant difference in TWD ( p = 0.021) with a higher TWD in the morbidly obese (41 mg) compared with underweight patients (24.4 mg, p = 0.017).

Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, morbidly obese patients may require higher TWD to obtain and maintain a therapeutic INR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价体重指数对住院患者华法林需用量的影响。
背景:尽管药物和疾病状态相互作用的剂量调整已经建立,但体重指数(BM)对华法林的影响仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估住院患者对华法林的需求,并按BMI分层。方法:本回顾性研究包括两组患者:A组(治疗性国际标准化比率(INR)入院的患者)和B组(住院期间新开始使用华法林)。排除标准包括:年龄在18岁以下,怀孕,INR(目标2.5-3.5),骨科手术后华法林血栓预防。主要结局是基于体重分类的华法林平均每周总剂量(TWD):体重不足(BMI 2),正常/超重(BMI 18-29.9 kg/m2),肥胖(BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2)和病态肥胖(BMI大于或等于40 kg/m2)。在2015年7月至2013年6月期间,数据按时间倒序从两家社区医院中提取,直到两个研究机构在每个BMI分类中对每个队列中100名患者进行评估,或者直到所有患者在预先规定的时间范围内进行评估。结果:A队列共纳入585例患者(体重过轻26例,正常/超重200例,肥胖200例,病态肥胖159例)。经单因素方差分析,两组间TWD差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。Tukey事后检验显示,病态肥胖患者的TWD (41.5 mg)高于体重不足患者(25.6 mg, p < 0.05)、正常/超重患者(28.8 mg, p < 0.05)和肥胖患者(32.4 mg, p < 0.05)。在队列B中,评估了379例患者(9例体重不足,166例正常/超重,152例肥胖,52例病态肥胖)。总体而言,191例患者在出院时出现治疗性INR(88.9%体重不足,52.4%正常/超重,44.1%肥胖,55.8%病态肥胖,p = 0.035)。其中,TWD差异有统计学意义(p = 0.021),病态肥胖患者的TWD (41 mg)高于体重不足患者(24.4 mg, p = 0.017)。结论:基于本研究的结果,病态肥胖患者可能需要更高的TWD来获得和维持治疗性INR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is aimed at clinicians and researchers from the cardiovascular disease field and will be a forum for all views and reviews relating to this discipline.Topics covered will include: ·arteriosclerosis ·cardiomyopathies ·coronary artery disease ·diabetes ·heart failure ·hypertension ·metabolic syndrome ·obesity ·peripheral arterial disease ·stroke ·arrhythmias ·genetics
期刊最新文献
Outcomes among patients with coronary artery bypass grafts presenting with acute coronary syndrome: impact of revascularization. Sex-related differences in heart failure patients: physiological mechanisms of cardiovascular ageing and evidence-based sex-specific medical therapies. Ascending aortic replacement versus aortic root replacement in patients with type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root. Thanks to reviewers. Carotid artery atherosclerosis, low and high volumes of high-intensity interval training in patients after myocardial infarction: the precision of measurement embarks on a precise measurement protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1