Evaluation of the impact of body mass index on warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients.

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2018-08-01 Epub Date: 2018-06-19 DOI:10.1177/1753944718781295
Katie B Tellor, Steffany N Nguyen, Amanda C Bultas, Anastasia L Armbruster, Nicholas A Greenwald, Abigail M Yancey
{"title":"Evaluation of the impact of body mass index on warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients.","authors":"Katie B Tellor,&nbsp;Steffany N Nguyen,&nbsp;Amanda C Bultas,&nbsp;Anastasia L Armbruster,&nbsp;Nicholas A Greenwald,&nbsp;Abigail M Yancey","doi":"10.1177/1753944718781295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite well established empiric dose adjustments for drug and disease-state interactions, the impact of body mass index (BM) on warfarin remains unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients, stratified by BMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review included two cohorts of patients: cohort A (patients admitted with a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR)) and cohort B (newly initiated on warfarin during hospitalization). Exclusion criteria included: age under 18 years, pregnancy, INR (goal 2.5-3.5), and warfarin thromboprophylaxis post orthopedic surgery. The primary outcome was mean total weekly dose (TWD) of warfarin based on weight classification: underweight (BMI <18 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), normal/overweight (BMI 18-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and morbidly obese (BMI ⩾ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Data were extracted from two community hospitals in reverse chronologic order during July 2015-June 2013 until both study institutions evaluated 100 patients per cohort in each BMI classification or until all patients had been evaluated within the prespecified timeframe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 585 patients were included in cohort A (26 underweight, 200 normal/overweight, 200 obese, 159 morbidly obese). There was a statistically significant difference in TWD as determined by one-way analysis of variance ( p < 0.05). A Tukey post hoc test revealed a statistically significantly higher TWD in morbidly obese (41.5 mg) compared with underweight (25.6 mg, p < 0.05), normal/overweight (28.8 mg, p < 0.05) and obese patients (32.4 mg, p < 0.05). In cohort B, 379 patients were evaluated (9 underweight, 166 normal/overweight, 152 obese, 52 morbidly obese). Overall, 191 patients had a therapeutic INR on discharge (88.9% underweight, 52.4% normal/overweight, 44.1% obese, 55.8% morbidly obese, p = 0.035). Of those, there was a statistically significant difference in TWD ( p = 0.021) with a higher TWD in the morbidly obese (41 mg) compared with underweight patients (24.4 mg, p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the results of this study, morbidly obese patients may require higher TWD to obtain and maintain a therapeutic INR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23035,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"12 8","pages":"207-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753944718781295","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944718781295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Despite well established empiric dose adjustments for drug and disease-state interactions, the impact of body mass index (BM) on warfarin remains unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate warfarin requirements in hospitalized patients, stratified by BMI.

Methods: This retrospective review included two cohorts of patients: cohort A (patients admitted with a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR)) and cohort B (newly initiated on warfarin during hospitalization). Exclusion criteria included: age under 18 years, pregnancy, INR (goal 2.5-3.5), and warfarin thromboprophylaxis post orthopedic surgery. The primary outcome was mean total weekly dose (TWD) of warfarin based on weight classification: underweight (BMI <18 kg/m2), normal/overweight (BMI 18-29.9 kg/m2), obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (BMI ⩾ 40 kg/m2). Data were extracted from two community hospitals in reverse chronologic order during July 2015-June 2013 until both study institutions evaluated 100 patients per cohort in each BMI classification or until all patients had been evaluated within the prespecified timeframe.

Results: A total of 585 patients were included in cohort A (26 underweight, 200 normal/overweight, 200 obese, 159 morbidly obese). There was a statistically significant difference in TWD as determined by one-way analysis of variance ( p < 0.05). A Tukey post hoc test revealed a statistically significantly higher TWD in morbidly obese (41.5 mg) compared with underweight (25.6 mg, p < 0.05), normal/overweight (28.8 mg, p < 0.05) and obese patients (32.4 mg, p < 0.05). In cohort B, 379 patients were evaluated (9 underweight, 166 normal/overweight, 152 obese, 52 morbidly obese). Overall, 191 patients had a therapeutic INR on discharge (88.9% underweight, 52.4% normal/overweight, 44.1% obese, 55.8% morbidly obese, p = 0.035). Of those, there was a statistically significant difference in TWD ( p = 0.021) with a higher TWD in the morbidly obese (41 mg) compared with underweight patients (24.4 mg, p = 0.017).

Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, morbidly obese patients may require higher TWD to obtain and maintain a therapeutic INR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价体重指数对住院患者华法林需用量的影响。
背景:尽管药物和疾病状态相互作用的剂量调整已经建立,但体重指数(BM)对华法林的影响仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估住院患者对华法林的需求,并按BMI分层。方法:本回顾性研究包括两组患者:A组(治疗性国际标准化比率(INR)入院的患者)和B组(住院期间新开始使用华法林)。排除标准包括:年龄在18岁以下,怀孕,INR(目标2.5-3.5),骨科手术后华法林血栓预防。主要结局是基于体重分类的华法林平均每周总剂量(TWD):体重不足(BMI 2),正常/超重(BMI 18-29.9 kg/m2),肥胖(BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2)和病态肥胖(BMI大于或等于40 kg/m2)。在2015年7月至2013年6月期间,数据按时间倒序从两家社区医院中提取,直到两个研究机构在每个BMI分类中对每个队列中100名患者进行评估,或者直到所有患者在预先规定的时间范围内进行评估。结果:A队列共纳入585例患者(体重过轻26例,正常/超重200例,肥胖200例,病态肥胖159例)。经单因素方差分析,两组间TWD差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。Tukey事后检验显示,病态肥胖患者的TWD (41.5 mg)高于体重不足患者(25.6 mg, p < 0.05)、正常/超重患者(28.8 mg, p < 0.05)和肥胖患者(32.4 mg, p < 0.05)。在队列B中,评估了379例患者(9例体重不足,166例正常/超重,152例肥胖,52例病态肥胖)。总体而言,191例患者在出院时出现治疗性INR(88.9%体重不足,52.4%正常/超重,44.1%肥胖,55.8%病态肥胖,p = 0.035)。其中,TWD差异有统计学意义(p = 0.021),病态肥胖患者的TWD (41 mg)高于体重不足患者(24.4 mg, p = 0.017)。结论:基于本研究的结果,病态肥胖患者可能需要更高的TWD来获得和维持治疗性INR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is aimed at clinicians and researchers from the cardiovascular disease field and will be a forum for all views and reviews relating to this discipline.Topics covered will include: ·arteriosclerosis ·cardiomyopathies ·coronary artery disease ·diabetes ·heart failure ·hypertension ·metabolic syndrome ·obesity ·peripheral arterial disease ·stroke ·arrhythmias ·genetics
期刊最新文献
Evolocumab use in clinical practice in Switzerland: final data of the observational HEYMANS cohort study. The impact of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasospastic angina: a review on diagnostic approach and management. Percutaneous image-guided management of a misplaced pericardiocentesis catheter into the inferior vena cava. Safety and potential usefulness of sequential intracoronary acetylcholine and ergonovine administration for spasm provocation testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1