Adding acceptance and commitment therapy to exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.005
Michael P. Twohig , Jonathan S. Abramowitz , Brooke M. Smith , Laura E. Fabricant , Ryan J. Jacoby , Kate L. Morrison , Ellen J. Bluett , Lillian Reuman , Shannon M. Blakey , Thomas Ledermann
{"title":"Adding acceptance and commitment therapy to exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Michael P. Twohig ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Abramowitz ,&nbsp;Brooke M. Smith ,&nbsp;Laura E. Fabricant ,&nbsp;Ryan J. Jacoby ,&nbsp;Kate L. Morrison ,&nbsp;Ellen J. Bluett ,&nbsp;Lillian Reuman ,&nbsp;Shannon M. Blakey ,&nbsp;Thomas Ledermann","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The objective of this study was to test whether treatment acceptability, exposure engagement, and completion rates could be increased by integrating </span>acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with traditional exposure and response prevention (ERP). 58 adults (68% female) diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; </span><em>M</em><span> age = 27, 80% white) engaged in a multisite randomized controlled trial<span><span><span> of 16 individual twice-weekly sessions of either ERP or ACT + ERP. Assessors unaware of treatment condition administered assessments of OCD, depression, psychological flexibility, and obsessional beliefs at pretreatment, posttreatment, and six-month follow-up. Treatment acceptability, credibility/expectancy, and exposure engagement were also assessed. Exposure engagement was high in both conditions and there were no significant differences in exposure engagement, treatment acceptability, or dropout rates between ACT + ERP and ERP. OCD symptoms, depression, psychological inflexibility, and obsessional beliefs decreased significantly at posttreatment and were maintained at follow-up in both conditions. No between-group differences in outcome were observed using </span>intent to treat and predicted data from </span>multilevel modeling. ACT + ERP and ERP were both highly effective treatments for OCD, and no differences were found in outcomes, processes of change, acceptability, or exposure engagement.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"108 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.005","citationCount":"88","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796718300925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test whether treatment acceptability, exposure engagement, and completion rates could be increased by integrating acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with traditional exposure and response prevention (ERP). 58 adults (68% female) diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; M age = 27, 80% white) engaged in a multisite randomized controlled trial of 16 individual twice-weekly sessions of either ERP or ACT + ERP. Assessors unaware of treatment condition administered assessments of OCD, depression, psychological flexibility, and obsessional beliefs at pretreatment, posttreatment, and six-month follow-up. Treatment acceptability, credibility/expectancy, and exposure engagement were also assessed. Exposure engagement was high in both conditions and there were no significant differences in exposure engagement, treatment acceptability, or dropout rates between ACT + ERP and ERP. OCD symptoms, depression, psychological inflexibility, and obsessional beliefs decreased significantly at posttreatment and were maintained at follow-up in both conditions. No between-group differences in outcome were observed using intent to treat and predicted data from multilevel modeling. ACT + ERP and ERP were both highly effective treatments for OCD, and no differences were found in outcomes, processes of change, acceptability, or exposure engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在强迫症暴露和反应预防中加入接受和承诺疗法:一项随机对照试验
本研究的目的是测试是否可以通过将接受和承诺治疗(ACT)与传统的暴露和反应预防(ERP)相结合来提高治疗的可接受性、暴露参与和完成率。58名成年人(68%为女性)被诊断患有强迫症(OCD;(年龄= 27岁,80%为白人)参与了一项16人的多地点随机对照试验,每星期进行两次ERP或ACT + ERP。不知道治疗情况的评估者在治疗前、治疗后和六个月的随访中对强迫症、抑郁症、心理灵活性和强迫信念进行评估。治疗可接受性、可信度/期望和暴露参与也进行了评估。在这两种情况下,暴露参与度都很高,ACT + ERP和ERP在暴露参与度、治疗可接受性或辍学率方面没有显著差异。强迫症症状、抑郁、心理不灵活和强迫信念在治疗后显著减少,并在两种情况下的随访中保持不变。使用意向治疗和多层模型预测数据,未观察到组间结果差异。ACT + ERP和ERP都是非常有效的强迫症治疗方法,在结果、改变过程、可接受性或暴露参与方面没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Direct mapping of intervention to thought features: A Bayesian proof-of-concept study Editorial Board Examining concordance between emotion-dependent risk-taking in the laboratory and in the real-world Associations among threat prediction error, prediction change, and anxiety during an exposure therapy analogue in adults with healthy to clinical social anxiety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1