Sensory studies, or when physics was psychophysics: Ernst Mach and physics between physiology and psychology, 1860-71.

IF 1.1 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE History of Science Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-10 DOI:10.1177/0073275318784104
Richard Staley
{"title":"Sensory studies, or when physics was <i>psychophysics</i>: Ernst Mach and physics between physiology and psychology, 1860-71.","authors":"Richard Staley","doi":"10.1177/0073275318784104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper highlights the significance of sensory studies and psychophysical investigations of the relations between psychic and physical phenomena for our understanding of the development of the physics discipline, by examining aspects of research on sense perception, physiology, esthetics, and psychology in the work of Gustav Theodor Fechner, Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt, and Ernst Mach between 1860 and 1871. It complements previous approaches oriented around research on vision, Fechner's psychophysics, or the founding of experimental psychology, by charting Mach's engagement with psychophysical experiments in particular. Examining Mach's study of the senses and esthetics, his changing attitudes toward the mechanical worldview and atomism, and his articulation of comparative understandings of sensual, geometrical, and physical spaces helps set Mach's emerging epistemological views in the context of his teaching and research. Mach complemented an analytic strategy focused on parallel psychic and physical dimensions of sensation, with a synthetic comparative approach - building analogies between the retina, the individual, and social life, and moving between abstract and sensual spaces. An examination of the broadly based critique that Mach articulated in his 1871 lecture on the conservation of work shows how his historical approach helped Mach cast what he now saw as a narrowly limiting emphasis on mechanics as a phase yet to be overcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50404,"journal":{"name":"History of Science","volume":"59 1","pages":"93-118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0073275318784104","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275318784104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper highlights the significance of sensory studies and psychophysical investigations of the relations between psychic and physical phenomena for our understanding of the development of the physics discipline, by examining aspects of research on sense perception, physiology, esthetics, and psychology in the work of Gustav Theodor Fechner, Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt, and Ernst Mach between 1860 and 1871. It complements previous approaches oriented around research on vision, Fechner's psychophysics, or the founding of experimental psychology, by charting Mach's engagement with psychophysical experiments in particular. Examining Mach's study of the senses and esthetics, his changing attitudes toward the mechanical worldview and atomism, and his articulation of comparative understandings of sensual, geometrical, and physical spaces helps set Mach's emerging epistemological views in the context of his teaching and research. Mach complemented an analytic strategy focused on parallel psychic and physical dimensions of sensation, with a synthetic comparative approach - building analogies between the retina, the individual, and social life, and moving between abstract and sensual spaces. An examination of the broadly based critique that Mach articulated in his 1871 lecture on the conservation of work shows how his historical approach helped Mach cast what he now saw as a narrowly limiting emphasis on mechanics as a phase yet to be overcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感觉研究,或者当物理学还是心理物理学的时候:恩斯特·马赫和物理学在生理学和心理学之间,1860-71。
本文通过考察古斯塔夫·西奥多·费希纳、赫尔曼·冯·亥姆霍兹、威廉·冯特和恩斯特·马赫在1860年至1871年间对感官知觉、生理学、美学和心理学的研究,强调了感官研究和心理物理现象之间关系的心理物理研究对我们理解物理学学科发展的重要性。它补充了先前以视觉研究为导向的方法,Fechner的心理物理学,或实验心理学的创立,通过绘制马赫参与心理物理实验的图表。考察马赫对感官和美学的研究,他对机械世界观和原子论不断变化的态度,以及他对感官,几何和物理空间的比较理解的表达,有助于在他的教学和研究背景下建立马赫的新兴认识论观点。马赫补充了一种分析策略,专注于感觉的平行心理和物理维度,采用综合比较方法——在视网膜、个人和社会生活之间建立类比,在抽象和感官空间之间移动。对马赫在1871年关于功守恒的演讲中所阐述的基础广泛的批评的考察表明,他的历史方法如何帮助马赫将他现在所看到的对力学的狭隘限制强调作为一个有待克服的阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Science
History of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: History of Science is peer reviewed journal devoted to the history of science, medicine and technology from earliest times to the present day. Articles discussing methodology, and reviews of the current state of knowledge and possibilities for future research, are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
National climate: Zhu Kezhen and the framing of the atmosphere in modern China. Nafia for the Tigris: The Privy Purse and the infrastructure of development in late Ottoman Iraq, 1882-1914. Progressing into disaster: The railroad and the spread of cholera in a provincial Ottoman town. The politics of electricity use and non-use in late Ottoman Istanbul. From laboratory to mountaintop: Creating an artificial aurora in the late nineteenth century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1