Parents’opinions of the changes in their children’s epilepsy treatment during the transition from childhood to adulthood.

Q4 Medicine No To Hattatsu Pub Date : 2016-07-01
Mitsuru Kashiwagi, Hiroshi Arai, Lisa Uno, Ichiro Kuki, Shuichi Shimakawa, Tetsuzo Tagawa, Takuya Tanabe, Yasuhisa Toribe, Toshisaburo Nagai, Yukiko Mogami
{"title":"Parents’opinions of the changes in their children’s epilepsy treatment during the transition from childhood to adulthood.","authors":"Mitsuru Kashiwagi,&nbsp;Hiroshi Arai,&nbsp;Lisa Uno,&nbsp;Ichiro Kuki,&nbsp;Shuichi Shimakawa,&nbsp;Tetsuzo Tagawa,&nbsp;Takuya Tanabe,&nbsp;Yasuhisa Toribe,&nbsp;Toshisaburo Nagai,&nbsp;Yukiko Mogami","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: Patients with childhood-onset epilepsy often need continued epilepsy treatment into adulthood. We investigated parents’ opinions of the changes in their children’s epilepsy treatment during the transition from childhood to adulthood using questionnaires and formulated agendas to build the appropriate medical treatment system for epilepsy. Methods: We distributed questionnaires to parents of patients with epilepsy who were 12 to 18 years old. Results: We distributed 176 questionnaires, and analyzed 79 (45%) questionnaires. Most parents (59%) wanted their child to continue treatment for epilepsy in the pediatrics department because of confidence in the current treatment environment. Most parents (73%) were anxious about their child not being treated in the pediatrics department during future epilepsy medical treatments because of concerns about whether a proper handover from the pediatrics department to other departments is possible. No parent was recommended the departmental transition by the primary pediatrician to other courses for future epilepsy treatment, while 19% of par-ents had a sense of incongruity regarding epilepsy treatment at the current pediatrics department. Parents who were anxious about future epilepsy treatments had significantly fewer general-school students than parents without anxiety. In addition, their children had more seizures than children of parents who were not anxious. Furthermore, they wanted their child to continue treatment for epilepsy in the pediatrics department more than the parents without anxiety. Conclusions: Approximately 70% of the parents were anxious about obtaining future epilepsy treatment in clinical departments other than the pediatrics department. To build a satisfactory medical treatment system for patients with epilepsy having different backgrounds and requiring continued treatment in adulthood, it is important to create a cooperating network consisting of pediatricians, neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrists, and epileptologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":39367,"journal":{"name":"No To Hattatsu","volume":"48 4","pages":"271-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No To Hattatsu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients with childhood-onset epilepsy often need continued epilepsy treatment into adulthood. We investigated parents’ opinions of the changes in their children’s epilepsy treatment during the transition from childhood to adulthood using questionnaires and formulated agendas to build the appropriate medical treatment system for epilepsy. Methods: We distributed questionnaires to parents of patients with epilepsy who were 12 to 18 years old. Results: We distributed 176 questionnaires, and analyzed 79 (45%) questionnaires. Most parents (59%) wanted their child to continue treatment for epilepsy in the pediatrics department because of confidence in the current treatment environment. Most parents (73%) were anxious about their child not being treated in the pediatrics department during future epilepsy medical treatments because of concerns about whether a proper handover from the pediatrics department to other departments is possible. No parent was recommended the departmental transition by the primary pediatrician to other courses for future epilepsy treatment, while 19% of par-ents had a sense of incongruity regarding epilepsy treatment at the current pediatrics department. Parents who were anxious about future epilepsy treatments had significantly fewer general-school students than parents without anxiety. In addition, their children had more seizures than children of parents who were not anxious. Furthermore, they wanted their child to continue treatment for epilepsy in the pediatrics department more than the parents without anxiety. Conclusions: Approximately 70% of the parents were anxious about obtaining future epilepsy treatment in clinical departments other than the pediatrics department. To build a satisfactory medical treatment system for patients with epilepsy having different backgrounds and requiring continued treatment in adulthood, it is important to create a cooperating network consisting of pediatricians, neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrists, and epileptologists.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母对孩子从童年到成年癫痫治疗变化的看法。
目的:儿童期癫痫患者往往需要持续治疗直至成年。我们采用问卷调查的方式了解家长对儿童癫痫治疗在儿童期到成人期转变过程中发生的变化的看法,并制定议程,以建立适合儿童癫痫治疗的医疗体系。方法:对12 ~ 18岁癫痫患者的家长进行问卷调查。结果:共发放问卷176份,分析问卷79份(45%)。大多数家长(59%)希望他们的孩子继续在儿科接受癫痫治疗,因为他们对目前的治疗环境有信心。大多数家长(73%)担心他们的孩子在未来的癫痫医学治疗中没有在儿科接受治疗,因为他们担心是否有可能从儿科适当地移交给其他部门。没有家长被初级儿科医生推荐科室转换到其他课程以进行未来的癫痫治疗,而19%的家长对目前儿科的癫痫治疗有不协调感。对未来癫痫治疗感到焦虑的家长所生的普通学校学生明显少于没有焦虑的家长。此外,他们的孩子比那些没有焦虑的父母的孩子有更多的癫痫发作。此外,与没有焦虑的父母相比,他们更希望自己的孩子继续在儿科接受癫痫治疗。结论:约70%的患儿家长对今后能否在儿科以外的临床科室接受癫痫治疗感到焦虑。建立一个由儿科医生、神经科医生、神经外科医生、精神科医生和癫痫医生组成的合作网络,对不同背景和成年期需要持续治疗的癫痫患者建立一个满意的医疗体系是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
No To Hattatsu
No To Hattatsu Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Historiae]. [Introductory remarks]. [Clinical characteristics of early juvenile GM2 gangliosidosis: a case report]. [Successful treatment with topiramate in a case of idiopathic intracranial hypertension refractory to acetazolamide]. [Ictal arterial spin labeling MRI findings in two cases of acute confusional migraine].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1