Among the Severely Mentally Ill, Who Responds to Ziprasidone?

Nigel Bark, Nicholas Lawson, Eileen Trigoboff, Rodica Varadi, Jeffery Grace, Josie Olympia, Nighat Sindhu, Tom Watson, Mohamed El-Defrawi, Punyabrata Roy
{"title":"Among the Severely Mentally Ill, Who Responds to Ziprasidone?","authors":"Nigel Bark,&nbsp;Nicholas Lawson,&nbsp;Eileen Trigoboff,&nbsp;Rodica Varadi,&nbsp;Jeffery Grace,&nbsp;Josie Olympia,&nbsp;Nighat Sindhu,&nbsp;Tom Watson,&nbsp;Mohamed El-Defrawi,&nbsp;Punyabrata Roy","doi":"10.3371/CSRP.BALA123015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>So far, demographic variables have not consistently been found to predict clinical response to antipsychotics. This study examines some differences in response to ziprasidone, which has been shown to be effective, with a better metabolic side effect profile, but was little used in New York State Hospitals. The aim was to study state hospital patients switched to ziprasidone. The results led to questions about different responses in different groups. Subjects from state hospitals who needed a change of antipsychotic participated in this open-label, 8-week trial of up to 240-mg ziprasidone. Analyses included comparisons of the very different results from two sites. Of the 36 study subjects, 12 terminated early. The 17 outpatients from Buffalo, who were older and on lower doses of antipsychotics pre-study, improved significantly. The 19 inpatients from the Bronx, overall younger and on higher pre-study doses, barely changed. Improvements in PANSS total score were significantly associated with older age, greater baseline severity, and lower doses of antipsychotics pre-study. The subjects improved on metabolic parameters. The results suggest that ziprasidone may be just as effective as previous antipsychotics taken by these severely mentally ill patients, and with fewer metabolic side effects. Note: The study described here includes a dosage of ziprasidone that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA has approved daily doses of ziprasidone no greater than 100 mg PO bid.</p>","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.BALA123015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

So far, demographic variables have not consistently been found to predict clinical response to antipsychotics. This study examines some differences in response to ziprasidone, which has been shown to be effective, with a better metabolic side effect profile, but was little used in New York State Hospitals. The aim was to study state hospital patients switched to ziprasidone. The results led to questions about different responses in different groups. Subjects from state hospitals who needed a change of antipsychotic participated in this open-label, 8-week trial of up to 240-mg ziprasidone. Analyses included comparisons of the very different results from two sites. Of the 36 study subjects, 12 terminated early. The 17 outpatients from Buffalo, who were older and on lower doses of antipsychotics pre-study, improved significantly. The 19 inpatients from the Bronx, overall younger and on higher pre-study doses, barely changed. Improvements in PANSS total score were significantly associated with older age, greater baseline severity, and lower doses of antipsychotics pre-study. The subjects improved on metabolic parameters. The results suggest that ziprasidone may be just as effective as previous antipsychotics taken by these severely mentally ill patients, and with fewer metabolic side effects. Note: The study described here includes a dosage of ziprasidone that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA has approved daily doses of ziprasidone no greater than 100 mg PO bid.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重度精神病患者对齐拉西酮有反应?
到目前为止,尚未发现人口统计学变量能够预测抗精神病药物的临床反应。本研究考察了对齐拉西酮反应的一些差异,齐拉西酮已被证明是有效的,具有更好的代谢副作用,但在纽约州医院很少使用。目的是研究改用齐拉西酮的州立医院患者。结果引出了关于不同群体不同反应的问题。需要改变抗精神病药物的国立医院的受试者参加了这个开放标签的8周试验,剂量为240毫克齐拉西酮。分析包括对两个地点非常不同的结果进行比较。在36名研究对象中,有12人提前终止了研究。来自布法罗的17名门诊患者年龄较大,研究前服用的抗精神病药物剂量较低,他们的病情明显好转。来自布朗克斯的19名住院患者,总体上更年轻,研究前剂量更高,几乎没有变化。PANSS总分的改善与年龄较大、基线严重程度较高和研究前抗精神病药物剂量较低显著相关。受试者的代谢参数有所改善。结果表明,齐拉西酮可能与这些严重精神疾病患者以前服用的抗精神病药物一样有效,而且代谢副作用更少。注意:这里描述的研究包括齐拉西酮的剂量尚未得到美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的批准。FDA已经批准齐拉西酮的每日剂量不超过100mg PO bid。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
期刊最新文献
Dysexecutive Behavior in First-Episode Schizophrenia. Dysexecutive Behavior in First-Episode Schizophrenia Grading meningiomas by used imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging The Association between Serum Levels of Ferritin and D-Dimer with Liver Function Tests in Patients with COVID-19 Role of Susceptibility Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neurological Diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1