Can Peripheral Blood-Derived Gene Expressions Characterize Individuals at Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis?

Wilson Wen Bin Goh, Judy Chia-Ghee Sng, Jie Yin Yee, Yuen Mei See, Tih-Shih Lee, Limsoon Wong, Jimmy Lee
{"title":"Can Peripheral Blood-Derived Gene Expressions Characterize Individuals at Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis?","authors":"Wilson Wen Bin Goh,&nbsp;Judy Chia-Ghee Sng,&nbsp;Jie Yin Yee,&nbsp;Yuen Mei See,&nbsp;Tih-Shih Lee,&nbsp;Limsoon Wong,&nbsp;Jimmy Lee","doi":"10.1162/CPSY_a_00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ultra-high risk (UHR) state was originally conceived to identify individuals at imminent risk of developing psychosis. Although recent studies have suggested that most individuals designated UHR do not, they constitute a distinctive group, exhibiting cognitive and functional impairments alongside multiple psychiatric morbidities. UHR characterization using molecular markers may improve understanding, provide novel insight into pathophysiology, and perhaps improve psychosis prediction reliability. Whole-blood gene expressions from 56 UHR subjects and 28 healthy controls are checked for existence of a consistent gene expression profile (signature) underlying UHR, across a variety of normalization and heterogeneity-removal techniques, including simple log-conversion, quantile normalization, gene fuzzy scoring (GFS), and surrogate variable analysis. During functional analysis, consistent and reproducible identification of important genes depends largely on how data are normalized. Normalization techniques that address sample heterogeneity are superior. The best performer, the unsupervised GFS, produced a strong and concise 12-gene signature, enriched for psychosis-associated genes. Importantly, when applied on random subsets of data, classifiers built with GFS are \"meaningful\" in the sense that the classifier models built using genes selected after other forms of normalization do not outperform random ones, but GFS-derived classifiers do. Data normalization can present highly disparate interpretations on biological data. Comparative analysis has shown that GFS is efficient at preserving signals while eliminating noise. Using this, we demonstrate confidently that the UHR designation is well correlated with a distinct blood-based gene signature.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"1 ","pages":"168-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/CPSY_a_00007","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/CPSY_a_00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The ultra-high risk (UHR) state was originally conceived to identify individuals at imminent risk of developing psychosis. Although recent studies have suggested that most individuals designated UHR do not, they constitute a distinctive group, exhibiting cognitive and functional impairments alongside multiple psychiatric morbidities. UHR characterization using molecular markers may improve understanding, provide novel insight into pathophysiology, and perhaps improve psychosis prediction reliability. Whole-blood gene expressions from 56 UHR subjects and 28 healthy controls are checked for existence of a consistent gene expression profile (signature) underlying UHR, across a variety of normalization and heterogeneity-removal techniques, including simple log-conversion, quantile normalization, gene fuzzy scoring (GFS), and surrogate variable analysis. During functional analysis, consistent and reproducible identification of important genes depends largely on how data are normalized. Normalization techniques that address sample heterogeneity are superior. The best performer, the unsupervised GFS, produced a strong and concise 12-gene signature, enriched for psychosis-associated genes. Importantly, when applied on random subsets of data, classifiers built with GFS are "meaningful" in the sense that the classifier models built using genes selected after other forms of normalization do not outperform random ones, but GFS-derived classifiers do. Data normalization can present highly disparate interpretations on biological data. Comparative analysis has shown that GFS is efficient at preserving signals while eliminating noise. Using this, we demonstrate confidently that the UHR designation is well correlated with a distinct blood-based gene signature.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周血来源的基因表达能表征精神病超高风险个体吗?
超高风险(UHR)状态最初被认为是为了识别即将发生精神病风险的个体。尽管最近的研究表明,大多数被指定为UHR的人没有,但他们构成了一个独特的群体,表现出认知和功能障碍以及多种精神疾病。使用分子标记物进行UHR表征可以提高理解,提供对病理生理学的新见解,并可能提高精神病预测的可靠性。通过各种标准化和异质性去除技术,包括简单对数转换、分位数标准化、基因模糊评分(GFS)和替代变量分析,检查56名UHR受试者和28名健康对照的全血基因表达是否存在一致的UHR基因表达谱(特征)。在功能分析过程中,重要基因的一致性和可重复性鉴定在很大程度上取决于数据的标准化方式。解决样本异质性的标准化技术是优越的。表现最好的是无监督GFS,它产生了一个强大而简洁的12个基因特征,富含精神病相关基因。重要的是,当应用于数据的随机子集时,使用GFS构建的分类器是“有意义的”,因为使用其他形式的归一化后选择的基因构建的分类器模型并不优于随机模型,但GFS衍生的分类器确实优于随机模型。数据归一化可以对生物数据提出高度不同的解释。比较分析表明,GFS在保持信号的同时消除噪声是有效的。利用这一点,我们自信地证明了UHR的命名与独特的基于血液的基因特征密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Active Inference Model of the Optimism Bias. Correction: Decision-Making, Pro-variance Biases and Mood-Related Traits. Test-Retest Reliability of Two Computationally-Characterised Affective Bias Tasks. Transdiagnostic Anxiety-Related Increases in Information Sampling are Associated With Altered Valuation. RDoC Framework Through the Lens of Predictive Processing: Focusing on Cognitive Systems Domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1