Electromagnetic interference from personal dust monitors and other electronic devices with proximity detection systems.

J Noll, R J Matetic, J Li, C Zhou, J DuCarme, M Reyes, J Srednicki
{"title":"Electromagnetic interference from personal dust monitors and other electronic devices with proximity detection systems.","authors":"J Noll,&nbsp;R J Matetic,&nbsp;J Li,&nbsp;C Zhou,&nbsp;J DuCarme,&nbsp;M Reyes,&nbsp;J Srednicki","doi":"10.19150/me.8237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In April 2016, the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) began requiring the use of continuous personal dust monitors to monitor and measure respirable mine dust exposures to underground coal miners. Mines are currently using the PDM3700 personal dust monitor to comply with this regulation. After the PDM3700's implementation, mine operators discovered that it interfered with proximity detection systems, thus exposing miners to potential striking and pinning hazards from continuous mining machines. Besides the PDM3700, other electronic devices were also previously reported to interfere with proximity detection systems. MSHA sought the aid of the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and mining industry stakeholders to determine how the PDM3700 and some other electronic devices and proximity detection systems interact with each other. Accordingly, NIOSH investigated existing standards, developed test protocols, designed experiments and conducted laboratory evaluations. Some interferences were observed to be caused by electromagnetic interference from some electronic devices, including the PDM3700. Results showed that there was no significant interference when the PDM3700, as well as other electronic devices, and the miner-wearable component of the proximity detection system were separated by distances of 15 cm (6 in.) or greater. In the present study, it was found that the PDM3700 and the personal alarm device needed to be at least 15 cm (6 in.) apart in order for them to be used simultaneously and reduce potential interference.</p>","PeriodicalId":91142,"journal":{"name":"Mining engineering","volume":"70 5","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108086/pdf/nihms-983795.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19150/me.8237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In April 2016, the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) began requiring the use of continuous personal dust monitors to monitor and measure respirable mine dust exposures to underground coal miners. Mines are currently using the PDM3700 personal dust monitor to comply with this regulation. After the PDM3700's implementation, mine operators discovered that it interfered with proximity detection systems, thus exposing miners to potential striking and pinning hazards from continuous mining machines. Besides the PDM3700, other electronic devices were also previously reported to interfere with proximity detection systems. MSHA sought the aid of the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and mining industry stakeholders to determine how the PDM3700 and some other electronic devices and proximity detection systems interact with each other. Accordingly, NIOSH investigated existing standards, developed test protocols, designed experiments and conducted laboratory evaluations. Some interferences were observed to be caused by electromagnetic interference from some electronic devices, including the PDM3700. Results showed that there was no significant interference when the PDM3700, as well as other electronic devices, and the miner-wearable component of the proximity detection system were separated by distances of 15 cm (6 in.) or greater. In the present study, it was found that the PDM3700 and the personal alarm device needed to be at least 15 cm (6 in.) apart in order for them to be used simultaneously and reduce potential interference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自个人灰尘监测器和其他带有接近探测系统的电子设备的电磁干扰。
2016年4月,美国矿山安全与健康管理局(MSHA)开始要求使用连续的个人粉尘监测器来监测和测量地下煤矿工人的可呼吸性矿井粉尘暴露情况。矿山目前正在使用PDM3700个人粉尘监测器来遵守这一规定。在PDM3700实施后,矿工发现它干扰了接近探测系统,从而使矿工暴露在连续采矿机的潜在撞击和钉住危险中。除PDM3700外,其他电子设备也曾被报道干扰近距离探测系统。MSHA寻求美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)和采矿业利益相关者的帮助,以确定PDM3700和其他一些电子设备和接近检测系统如何相互作用。因此,NIOSH调查了现有标准,制定了测试方案,设计了实验并进行了实验室评估。一些干扰被观察到是由一些电子设备的电磁干扰引起的,包括PDM3700。结果表明,当PDM3700以及其他电子设备与接近探测系统的矿工可穿戴组件之间的距离为15厘米(6英寸)或更大时,没有明显的干扰。在本研究中,我们发现PDM3700和个人报警装置需要至少相隔15厘米(6英寸)才能同时使用并减少潜在的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forty years of NIOSH/USBM-developed control technology: To reduce respirable dust exposure for miners in industrial minerals processing operations. Comparing the Implementation of Two Dust Control Technologies from a Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. Demonstrating the financial impact of mining injuries with the "Safety Pays in Mining" web application. Data transport over leaky feeder systems using Internet-Protocol-enabled land mobile radios. Improving protection against respirable dust at an underground crusher booth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1