A Systematic Review on the Effect of Mechanical Stretch on Hypertrophic Scars after Burn Injuries

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.11.001
Yu-ting Zhang , Cecilia W.P. Li-Tsang , Ricky K.C. Au
{"title":"A Systematic Review on the Effect of Mechanical Stretch on Hypertrophic Scars after Burn Injuries","authors":"Yu-ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Cecilia W.P. Li-Tsang ,&nbsp;Ricky K.C. Au","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>To review the effect of mechanical stretch on hypertrophic scars after burn injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review of all controlled trials related to the effect of mechanical stretch on post burn hypertrophic scars was conducted. Studies of conservative scar managements that applied mechanical forces parallel to the scar surface, including stretching exercise, massage, and splinting, were appraised. Eligible studies published in English between 1995 and 2016 were extracted from The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Science direct, SPORTDiscus, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale (PEDro). The journals were further screened with inclusion and exclusion criteria. PEDro was selected for further analysis and appraisal.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 853 articles identified. After a standardized screening mechanism stipulated, only nine full-text articles were selected for critical appraisal using PEDro. There were five articles of high quality, two of fair quality, and two of poor quality. Detailed training regime and outcomes of nine studies were summarised, including two studies with stretching exercise, six studies with massage, and one study with splinting. The physical parameters of scar assessments and the range of motion on affected areas were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>From extensive literature search, there was no strong evidence indicating the positive effect of mechanical stretch using stretching exercise, massage, or splinting on hypertrophic scars. A firm conclusion cannot be drawn for the discrepancy of outcome measures and varied effectiveness. Most of the included studies lacked objective evaluation or control group for comparison. Further high quality studies with larger sample size and using standardized measurements are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2016.11.001","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186116300535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Objective/Background

To review the effect of mechanical stretch on hypertrophic scars after burn injuries.

Methods

A systematic review of all controlled trials related to the effect of mechanical stretch on post burn hypertrophic scars was conducted. Studies of conservative scar managements that applied mechanical forces parallel to the scar surface, including stretching exercise, massage, and splinting, were appraised. Eligible studies published in English between 1995 and 2016 were extracted from The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Science direct, SPORTDiscus, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale (PEDro). The journals were further screened with inclusion and exclusion criteria. PEDro was selected for further analysis and appraisal.

Results

There were 853 articles identified. After a standardized screening mechanism stipulated, only nine full-text articles were selected for critical appraisal using PEDro. There were five articles of high quality, two of fair quality, and two of poor quality. Detailed training regime and outcomes of nine studies were summarised, including two studies with stretching exercise, six studies with massage, and one study with splinting. The physical parameters of scar assessments and the range of motion on affected areas were compared.

Conclusion

From extensive literature search, there was no strong evidence indicating the positive effect of mechanical stretch using stretching exercise, massage, or splinting on hypertrophic scars. A firm conclusion cannot be drawn for the discrepancy of outcome measures and varied effectiveness. Most of the included studies lacked objective evaluation or control group for comparison. Further high quality studies with larger sample size and using standardized measurements are needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械拉伸对烧伤后增生性瘢痕影响的系统综述
目的/背景探讨机械拉伸对烧伤后增生性瘢痕的影响。方法系统回顾所有与机械拉伸对烧伤后增生性瘢痕影响相关的对照试验。对保守疤痕管理的研究进行了评价,这些研究应用平行于疤痕表面的机械力,包括伸展运动、按摩和夹板。从Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Science direct、SPORTDiscus和物理治疗证据数据库量表(PEDro)中提取1995年至2016年发表的符合条件的英文研究。通过纳入和排除标准对期刊进行进一步筛选。选择PEDro进行进一步的分析和评估。结果共检出853篇。在标准化筛选机制规定后,仅选择9篇全文文章进行PEDro批判性评价。质量好的有五件,质量一般的两件,质量差的两件。总结了9项研究的详细训练方案和结果,包括2项伸展运动研究,6项按摩研究和1项夹板研究。比较疤痕评估的物理参数和受影响部位的活动范围。结论从广泛的文献检索中,没有强有力的证据表明通过拉伸运动、按摩或夹板对增生性瘢痕的机械拉伸有积极作用。对于结果测量的差异和不同的有效性,无法得出确切的结论。大多数纳入的研究缺乏客观评价或对照组进行比较。需要进一步进行更大样本量和使用标准化测量的高质量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
期刊最新文献
Validity and reliability of the functional test for hemiplegic upper Extremity–Thai version Stigma and the use of umbrellas, hiking poles and walking sticks to aid walking in Hong Kong Application of the participatory design in the testing of a baropodometric insole prototype for weight-bearing asymmetry after a stroke: A qualitative study Smartwatch-based functional assessment for upper extremity impairment after musculoskeletal injuries: A pilot study Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1