Immediate Postextractive Implants With and Without Bone Graft: 3-year Follow-up Results From a Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial.

3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry Implant Dentistry Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000816
Filiberto Mastrangelo, Giorgio Gastaldi, Raffaele Vinci, Giuseppe Troiano, Lucia Tettamanti, Enrico Gherlone, Lorenzo Lo Muzio
{"title":"Immediate Postextractive Implants With and Without Bone Graft: 3-year Follow-up Results From a Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial.","authors":"Filiberto Mastrangelo,&nbsp;Giorgio Gastaldi,&nbsp;Raffaele Vinci,&nbsp;Giuseppe Troiano,&nbsp;Lucia Tettamanti,&nbsp;Enrico Gherlone,&nbsp;Lorenzo Lo Muzio","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the outcome of single postextraction immediate implants placed with and without bone grafts in the esthetic maxillary premolar area for 3-year follow-up after loading.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After tooth extraction, 102 patients received 115 immediate dental implants. Patients were randomly allocated to immediate implant placement with (group A: 51) or without (group B: 51) anorganic bovine bone and resorbable collagen barrier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3 years (T36), 1 implant failed in each group. Thirty-seven patients showed inflammation and bleeding, 19 mucositis, and 2 periimplantitis. Statistical significant association was found between BOP and mucositis at T12 (P < 0.0005) and T36 (P < 0.0005). The mesial bone level was -0.61 mm in group B and -1.01 mm in group A (P < 0.001). The group B distal bone level was -0.71 mm and -1.12 mm in group A (P < 0.005). Group B's buccal mean probing was increased (+0.40 mm) than group A (+0.36 mm). Group B's palatal mean value was higher (+0.54 mm) than group A (+0.38 mm). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups. However, the Pink Esthetic Score and patient satisfaction were higher in group B than A (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of anorganic bovine bone substitute with a resorbable collagen barrier in immediate postextractive implants seems to improve the esthetic outcomes after a 3-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000816","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of single postextraction immediate implants placed with and without bone grafts in the esthetic maxillary premolar area for 3-year follow-up after loading.

Material and methods: After tooth extraction, 102 patients received 115 immediate dental implants. Patients were randomly allocated to immediate implant placement with (group A: 51) or without (group B: 51) anorganic bovine bone and resorbable collagen barrier.

Results: After 3 years (T36), 1 implant failed in each group. Thirty-seven patients showed inflammation and bleeding, 19 mucositis, and 2 periimplantitis. Statistical significant association was found between BOP and mucositis at T12 (P < 0.0005) and T36 (P < 0.0005). The mesial bone level was -0.61 mm in group B and -1.01 mm in group A (P < 0.001). The group B distal bone level was -0.71 mm and -1.12 mm in group A (P < 0.005). Group B's buccal mean probing was increased (+0.40 mm) than group A (+0.36 mm). Group B's palatal mean value was higher (+0.54 mm) than group A (+0.38 mm). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups. However, the Pink Esthetic Score and patient satisfaction were higher in group B than A (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The use of anorganic bovine bone substitute with a resorbable collagen barrier in immediate postextractive implants seems to improve the esthetic outcomes after a 3-year follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即刻拔牙后种植体带和不带骨移植:一项多中心对照随机试验的3年随访结果。
目的:评价单颗即刻种植体在上颌美观前磨牙区放置与不放置骨移植后3年随访的效果。材料与方法:102例患者拔牙后即刻种植115颗。患者被随机分配到立即植入(A组:51)或不植入(B组:51)无有机牛骨和可吸收胶原蛋白屏障。结果:3年(T36)后,两组各有1例种植失败。炎症出血37例,黏膜炎19例,种植周炎2例。T12 (P < 0.0005)和T36 (P < 0.0005)时BOP与粘膜炎有统计学意义。B组近中骨水平为-0.61 mm, A组为-1.01 mm (P < 0.001)。B组远端骨水平为-0.71 mm, A组为-1.12 mm (P < 0.005)。B组颊部平均探探量较A组(+0.36 mm)增加0.40 mm。B组腭均值(+0.54 mm)高于A组(+0.38 mm)。两组间差异无统计学意义。然而,B组的粉红美学评分和患者满意度高于A组(P < 0.001)。结论:在3年的随访后,使用具有可吸收胶原屏障的无机牛骨替代物在立即拔牙后种植体中似乎可以改善美观结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Implant Dentistry
Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Council Implant. Comparison Between a Computer-Aided Surgical Template and the Free-Hand Method: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Long-Term Outcomes of Tooth-Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Periodontally Compromised and Treated Patients Refusing Bone Grafting Surgical Therapies. Ridge Augmentation Comparing an Allograft Plus Autogenous Bone Chips to an Osteoinductive Demineralized Bone Matrix: A Clinical and Histologic Study in Humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1