18-month follow-up of randomized controlled trial of parent and child enhancement program.

Cynthia Leung, Sandra Tsang, Lok Yan Chan
{"title":"18-month follow-up of randomized controlled trial of parent and child enhancement program.","authors":"Cynthia Leung,&nbsp;Sandra Tsang,&nbsp;Lok Yan Chan","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2018.1528195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the 18-month effectiveness of the Parent and Child Enhancement (PACE) program through an 18-month follow-up of the participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included parents and children who participated in the PACE program in 2013-2014, where they were randomized into intervention (n = 76) and control (n = 73) groups. At the 18-month follow-up, participating parents completed questionnaires on their children's learning and behavior, and their own parenting. Children were individually assessed on their preschool concepts. There were 44 intervention group and 11 control group participants with complete data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggested that the intervention group participants were able to maintain their program gains at 18-month follow-up in children's learning, behavior and parents' own parenting, while there were no significant differences across the three time points for the control group participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provided some initial evidence on the sustainability of the PACE program.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 6","pages":"676-694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2018.1528195","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1528195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the 18-month effectiveness of the Parent and Child Enhancement (PACE) program through an 18-month follow-up of the participants.

Methods: Participants included parents and children who participated in the PACE program in 2013-2014, where they were randomized into intervention (n = 76) and control (n = 73) groups. At the 18-month follow-up, participating parents completed questionnaires on their children's learning and behavior, and their own parenting. Children were individually assessed on their preschool concepts. There were 44 intervention group and 11 control group participants with complete data.

Results: The results suggested that the intervention group participants were able to maintain their program gains at 18-month follow-up in children's learning, behavior and parents' own parenting, while there were no significant differences across the three time points for the control group participants.

Conclusion: The results provided some initial evidence on the sustainability of the PACE program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母与儿童强化计划的随机对照试验18个月随访。
目的:本研究旨在通过对参与者进行为期18个月的随访来评估亲子促进(PACE)计划18个月的有效性。方法:研究对象为2013-2014年参加PACE项目的家长和儿童,随机分为干预组(n = 76)和对照组(n = 73)。在18个月的随访中,参与调查的父母完成了关于他们孩子的学习和行为以及他们自己的育儿方式的调查问卷。对孩子们的学前教育概念进行了单独评估。干预组44例,对照组11例,资料完整。结果:干预组参与者在18个月的随访中,在孩子的学习、行为和父母自己的养育方面能够保持他们的项目成果,而对照组参与者在三个时间点之间没有显著差异。结论:研究结果为PACE项目的可持续性提供了一些初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freeing Chinese Abused Women From Stereotype: A Pretest-Posttest Comparison Study on Group Intervention in Refuge Centers. Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study. Toward evidence-based anti-human trafficking policy: a rapid review of CSE rehabilitation and evaluation of Indian legislation. Developing your communication skills in social work. The new social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1