[Reliability of OTC advertisement Relevance and quality of cited literature].

Journal de pharmacie de Belgique Pub Date : 2016-09-01
L Claes, V De Vylder, L De Stercke, I Muyshondt, S Schotte, A Van Hooimissen, N Van Paemel, E Mehuys, K J Boussery
{"title":"[Reliability of OTC advertisement Relevance and quality of cited literature].","authors":"L Claes,&nbsp;V De Vylder,&nbsp;L De Stercke,&nbsp;I Muyshondt,&nbsp;S Schotte,&nbsp;A Van Hooimissen,&nbsp;N Van Paemel,&nbsp;E Mehuys,&nbsp;K J Boussery","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Pharmacist receive a lot of publicity for OTC products. Often one or more literature references are mentioned to support the advertising claims. Objective In this study we examine: [1) whether the advertising claim is consistent with what is stated in the literature references mentioned on the leaflet and [2] whether these literature references are trustworthy. Method Through 60 randomly selected community pharmacies, pharmacist-directed advertisements for OTC products I= medicines, medical devices, dietary supplements and parapharmacy) with at least one bibliographic reference, were collected. The literature references listed in these leaflets were assessed in terms of content [= is the claim consistent with the information in the reference) and technically [= evaluation of the quality of the references]. Results The 85 collected OTC advertisements made 214 claims that referred to 243 references. Of these, 128 references did not support the promotional claim. The remaining 84 references did support the corresponding claim. From 31 references no full text was obtained. Of the 84 supporting references 44 were of dubious quality. The remaining 40 references were found to be reliable. Conclusion This study shows that the literature references in advertising leaflets for OTC-products are not a reliable source of information on the advertised product. Pharmacists should deal critically with this information and should be encouraged to consult reliable scientific sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":14736,"journal":{"name":"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Pharmacist receive a lot of publicity for OTC products. Often one or more literature references are mentioned to support the advertising claims. Objective In this study we examine: [1) whether the advertising claim is consistent with what is stated in the literature references mentioned on the leaflet and [2] whether these literature references are trustworthy. Method Through 60 randomly selected community pharmacies, pharmacist-directed advertisements for OTC products I= medicines, medical devices, dietary supplements and parapharmacy) with at least one bibliographic reference, were collected. The literature references listed in these leaflets were assessed in terms of content [= is the claim consistent with the information in the reference) and technically [= evaluation of the quality of the references]. Results The 85 collected OTC advertisements made 214 claims that referred to 243 references. Of these, 128 references did not support the promotional claim. The remaining 84 references did support the corresponding claim. From 31 references no full text was obtained. Of the 84 supporting references 44 were of dubious quality. The remaining 40 references were found to be reliable. Conclusion This study shows that the literature references in advertising leaflets for OTC-products are not a reliable source of information on the advertised product. Pharmacists should deal critically with this information and should be encouraged to consult reliable scientific sources.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【非处方药广告的可靠性、相关性与被引文献质量】。
药剂师收到了很多关于非处方药的宣传。通常会提到一个或多个文献文献来支持广告的说法。在本研究中,我们检验:[1]广告声称是否与宣传单上提及的文献中所述的内容一致;[2]这些文献是否可信。方法随机抽取60家社区药店,收集药师指导的非处方药(药品、医疗器械、膳食补充剂和副药)至少有一篇参考文献的广告。对这些宣传单中列出的文献参考文献进行了内容评估[=是否声明与参考文献中的信息一致]和技术评估[=对参考文献质量的评估]。结果85份收集到的非处方药广告共214条,引用文献243篇。其中,128份参考资料不支持促销主张。其余84条参考文献确实支持相应的主张。从31篇参考文献中没有得到全文。在84个支持参考文献中,有44个质量可疑。其余40篇文献被认为是可靠的。结论本研究表明,非处方药广告宣传单上的文献资料并不是广告产品的可靠信息来源。药剂师应审慎对待这些信息,并应鼓励他们咨询可靠的科学来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatitis C]. [Essential oils: good advice by the pharmacist is necessary]. [Practical guidelines to ensure the quality of compounded preparations in community pharmacies]. [The social sciences at the Faculty of Pharmacy: and innovative course of community health at the University of Montreal]. [Pharmaceutical care for pediatric hemato-oncology and stem cell transplantation patients. Inventory of experiences and needs].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1