Knowledge and Attitudes of Saudi Emergency Physicians toward t-PA Use in Stroke.

IF 1.7 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurology Research International Pub Date : 2018-10-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/3050278
Ali M Al Khathaami, Haya Aloraini, S Almudlej, Haifa Al Issa, Nourhan Elshammaa, Sami Alsolamy
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitudes of Saudi Emergency Physicians toward t-PA Use in Stroke.","authors":"Ali M Al Khathaami,&nbsp;Haya Aloraini,&nbsp;S Almudlej,&nbsp;Haifa Al Issa,&nbsp;Nourhan Elshammaa,&nbsp;Sami Alsolamy","doi":"10.1155/2018/3050278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) within 4.5 hours from onset improves outcome in patients with ischemic stroke and has been recommended by several international guidelines. Since its approval in 1996, the debate among emergency physicians continues particularly around the result interpretation of the first positive randomized controlled trial, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) clinical trial. This lack of consensus might negatively affect the delivery of effective stroke care. Here we aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude of Saudi emergency physicians toward t-PA use within 4.5 hours of onset in acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based, self-administered, locally designed questionnaire was sent to all emergency physicians practicing in the city of Riyadh from January to September 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 450 emergency physicians, 122 from ten hospitals in Riyadh participated in the survey, with a 27% response rate. The majority of participants were men (78%), and their mean age was 40 ± 8 years. Half of the participants were board certified, and 36% were consultants. Half of the participants consider the evidence for t-PA use in stroke within 4.5 hours of stroke onset to be controversial, and 41% recommend against its use due to lack of proven efficacy (37%), the risk of hemorrhagic complications (35%), lack of stroke expertise (21%), and medicolegal liability (9%). Nearly half were willing to administer IV t-PA for ischemic stroke in collaboration with remote stroke neurology consultation if telestroke is implemented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study detected inadequate knowledge and a negative attitude among Saudi emergency physicians toward t-PA use in acute stroke. This might negatively impact patient outcome. Therefore, we recommend developing urgent strategies to improve emergency physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in the management of acute stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19124,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3050278","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3050278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background and objectives: Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) within 4.5 hours from onset improves outcome in patients with ischemic stroke and has been recommended by several international guidelines. Since its approval in 1996, the debate among emergency physicians continues particularly around the result interpretation of the first positive randomized controlled trial, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) clinical trial. This lack of consensus might negatively affect the delivery of effective stroke care. Here we aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude of Saudi emergency physicians toward t-PA use within 4.5 hours of onset in acute ischemic stroke.

Methods: A web-based, self-administered, locally designed questionnaire was sent to all emergency physicians practicing in the city of Riyadh from January to September 2017.

Results: Out of 450 emergency physicians, 122 from ten hospitals in Riyadh participated in the survey, with a 27% response rate. The majority of participants were men (78%), and their mean age was 40 ± 8 years. Half of the participants were board certified, and 36% were consultants. Half of the participants consider the evidence for t-PA use in stroke within 4.5 hours of stroke onset to be controversial, and 41% recommend against its use due to lack of proven efficacy (37%), the risk of hemorrhagic complications (35%), lack of stroke expertise (21%), and medicolegal liability (9%). Nearly half were willing to administer IV t-PA for ischemic stroke in collaboration with remote stroke neurology consultation if telestroke is implemented.

Conclusion: Our study detected inadequate knowledge and a negative attitude among Saudi emergency physicians toward t-PA use in acute stroke. This might negatively impact patient outcome. Therefore, we recommend developing urgent strategies to improve emergency physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in the management of acute stroke.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特急诊医师对脑卒中使用t-PA的知识和态度。
背景和目的:发病后4.5小时内使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA)可改善缺血性卒中患者的预后,已被多个国际指南推荐。自1996年批准以来,急诊医生之间的争论仍在继续,特别是围绕第一个阳性随机对照试验的结果解释,即国家神经疾病和中风研究所(NINDS)临床试验。这种缺乏共识可能会对有效的卒中治疗产生负面影响。在这里,我们旨在评估沙特急诊医生对急性缺血性卒中发病后4.5小时内使用t-PA的知识和态度。方法:于2017年1月至9月向利雅得市所有执业急诊医生发送一份基于网络、自我管理、当地设计的问卷。结果:在450名急诊医生中,来自利雅得10家医院的122名医生参与了调查,回复率为27%。大多数参与者为男性(78%),平均年龄为40±8岁。一半的参与者是董事会认证的,36%是顾问。一半的参与者认为在中风发生后4.5小时内使用t-PA的证据是有争议的,41%的人由于缺乏证实的疗效(37%)、出血性并发症的风险(35%)、缺乏中风专业知识(21%)和医疗法律责任(9%)而反对使用t-PA。如果实施远程卒中,近一半的人愿意在远程卒中神经病学会诊的情况下给缺血性卒中患者静脉注射t-PA。结论:我们的研究发现沙特急诊医生对急性脑卒中使用t-PA的认识不足和态度消极。这可能会对患者的预后产生负面影响。因此,我们建议制定紧急策略,以提高急诊医生在急性卒中管理方面的知识、态度和信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on diseases of the nervous system, as well as normal neurological functioning. The journal will consider basic, translational, and clinical research, including animal models and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Increased Cerebrospinal Fluid Adenosine 5'-Triphosphate Levels in Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy. Glucometabolic-Related Genes as Diagnostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for Alzheimer's Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Bioinformatics Analysis Sleep Disorders and Fatigue among Patients with MS: The Role of Depression, Stress, and Anxiety. Neuroprotective Effects of Rosa damascena Extract against Aluminum Chloride-Induced Brain Damage in Rat Offspring Serum Level of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Thrombotic Type Are Predictive of Cognitive Impairment in the Acute Period of Ischemic Strokes Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1