[Comparison of Aortic Valve Replacement Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Combined with Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting].

Ryuichiro Abe, Akira Iura, Takeshi Iritakenishi, Tatsuyuki Imada, Yuji Fujino
{"title":"[Comparison of Aortic Valve Replacement Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Combined with Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting].","authors":"Ryuichiro Abe,&nbsp;Akira Iura,&nbsp;Takeshi Iritakenishi,&nbsp;Tatsuyuki Imada,&nbsp;Yuji Fujino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative management of aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR+CABG) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (TAVI+OPCAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone either AVR+CABG or TAVI+OPCAB for AS and CAD in Osaka Univer- sity Medical Hospital from January to October, 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AVR+CABG was performed in 11 pa- tients (group A) and TAVI+OPCAB was performed in 4 patients (group T) in this period. The patients in group T was significantly older than the patients in group A. There were no significant differences in other background factors. Procedure time and postoperative mechanical ventilation time were shorter in group T than in group A. Postoperative recovery was signifi- cantly faster in group T than in group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVI+OPCAB is less invasive than AVR+CABG and an effective treatment for high risk patient with AS and CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18254,"journal":{"name":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","volume":"66 4","pages":"370-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative management of aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR+CABG) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (TAVI+OPCAB).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone either AVR+CABG or TAVI+OPCAB for AS and CAD in Osaka Univer- sity Medical Hospital from January to October, 2014.

Results: AVR+CABG was performed in 11 pa- tients (group A) and TAVI+OPCAB was performed in 4 patients (group T) in this period. The patients in group T was significantly older than the patients in group A. There were no significant differences in other background factors. Procedure time and postoperative mechanical ventilation time were shorter in group T than in group A. Postoperative recovery was signifi- cantly faster in group T than in group A.

Conclusions: TAVI+OPCAB is less invasive than AVR+CABG and an effective treatment for high risk patient with AS and CAD.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[主动脉瓣置换术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术与经导管主动脉瓣植入术联合非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较]。
背景:本研究的目的是比较主动脉瓣置换术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术(AVR+CABG)与经导管主动脉瓣植入术联合非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(TAVI+OPCAB)的围手术期处理。方法:回顾性分析2014年1 - 10月在大阪大学医院行AVR+CABG或TAVI+OPCAB治疗AS和CAD的患者。结果:A组11例行AVR+CABG, T组4例行TAVI+OPCAB。T组患者年龄明显大于a组,其他背景因素差异无统计学意义。T组手术时间和术后机械通气时间均短于a组。T组术后恢复明显快于a组。结论:TAVI+OPCAB比AVR+CABG侵入性小,是治疗AS + CAD高危患者的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy]. Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound. Point-of-care Abdominal Ultrasound. Vascular Access and Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis. The PEAS Protocol, an Airway Ultrasound Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1