Turgut Karabağ, Emіne Altuntaş, Belma Kalaycı, Bahar Şahіn, Mustafa Umut Somuncu, Mustafa Ozan Çakır
{"title":"The relationship of Charlson comorbidity index with stent restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease.","authors":"Turgut Karabağ, Emіne Altuntaş, Belma Kalaycı, Bahar Şahіn, Mustafa Umut Somuncu, Mustafa Ozan Çakır","doi":"10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1; <i>n</i> = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2; <i>n</i> = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage (<i>r</i> = 0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>r</i> = 0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":45181,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","volume":"10 2","pages":"70-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.
Methods: Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1; n = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2; n = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Results: Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, p = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, p = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage (r = 0.29, p < 0.001; r = 0.25, p = 0.003, respectively).
Conclusions: In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.
目的:本研究的目的是探讨合并症[Charlson共病指数(CCI)]对早期行冠状动脉血管成形术患者支架再狭窄的影响。方法:将患者分为两组;严重再狭窄患者[支架段或其边缘(与支架相邻的5mm段)复发直径狭窄>50%](1组;N = 53,平均年龄:63.8±9.9岁)和无危重性再狭窄患者[N = 94,平均年龄:62.1±9.1岁)]。CCI和改良的CCI用于存在合并症的情况。采用Gensini评分系统评估冠状动脉病变(CAD)程度。结果:1组CCI和改良CCI评分明显高于2组(7.1±3.7 vs. 5.6±1.6,p = 0.006;6.9±3.6和4.5±1.5,p = 0.008)。改良后的CCI评分与再狭窄百分比之间虽有统计学意义,但相关性较弱(r = 0.29, p r = 0.25, p = 0.003)。结论:支架再狭窄患者CCI评分高于支架再狭窄患者。弥漫性冠心病患者的CCI评分高于病情较轻的患者。