Aleksandra A Zasada, Magdalena Rzeczkowska, Tomasz Wołkowicz, Kamila Formińska, Katarzyna Zacharczuk, Natalia Wolaniuk, Olga Paduch, Edgar Badell, Aleksandra Januszkiewicz, Nicole Guiso
{"title":"[Whole cell protein profiling characterization of Corynebacterium diphtheriae clinical isolates collected from various infections].","authors":"Aleksandra A Zasada, Magdalena Rzeczkowska, Tomasz Wołkowicz, Kamila Formińska, Katarzyna Zacharczuk, Natalia Wolaniuk, Olga Paduch, Edgar Badell, Aleksandra Januszkiewicz, Nicole Guiso","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Corynebacterium diphtheriae can cause various infections such as diphtheria, wound infections, septic arthritis, bacteraemia and endocarditis. Different virulence properties of the isolates might be related to different virulence factors expressed by the isolates. The objective of this study was to explore whether whole cell protein profiling might be useful in prediction of pathogenic properties of C. diphtheriae isolates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>C. disphtheriae isolates collected from diphtheria, invasive and local infections and from asymptomatic carriers in Poland, France, New Caledonia and Canada in 1950-2014 were investigated using whole cell protein profile analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the examined isolates were divided into two clades: A and B with similarity about 47%, but clade B was represented by only one isolate. The clade A was divided in two subclades A.I NS .II with similarity 53,2% and then into four groups: A.Ia, A.Ib, A.Ic and A.Id. The comparative analysis did not distinguish clearly toxigenic and nontoxigenic isolates as well as invasive and noninvasive isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whole cell protein profile analysis of C. diphtheria exhibits good concordance with other genotyping methods but this method is not able to distinguish clearly invasive from non-invasive isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"68 3-4","pages":"161-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Corynebacterium diphtheriae can cause various infections such as diphtheria, wound infections, septic arthritis, bacteraemia and endocarditis. Different virulence properties of the isolates might be related to different virulence factors expressed by the isolates. The objective of this study was to explore whether whole cell protein profiling might be useful in prediction of pathogenic properties of C. diphtheriae isolates.
Methods: C. disphtheriae isolates collected from diphtheria, invasive and local infections and from asymptomatic carriers in Poland, France, New Caledonia and Canada in 1950-2014 were investigated using whole cell protein profile analysis.
Results: All the examined isolates were divided into two clades: A and B with similarity about 47%, but clade B was represented by only one isolate. The clade A was divided in two subclades A.I NS .II with similarity 53,2% and then into four groups: A.Ia, A.Ib, A.Ic and A.Id. The comparative analysis did not distinguish clearly toxigenic and nontoxigenic isolates as well as invasive and noninvasive isolates.
Conclusions: Whole cell protein profile analysis of C. diphtheria exhibits good concordance with other genotyping methods but this method is not able to distinguish clearly invasive from non-invasive isolates.