Inter-Day Reliability of Finapres ® Cardiovascular Measurements During Rest and Exercise.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2017-11-17 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-122081
Mark Waldron, Stephen David Patterson, Owen Jeffries
{"title":"Inter-Day Reliability of Finapres <sup>®</sup> Cardiovascular Measurements During Rest and Exercise.","authors":"Mark Waldron,&nbsp;Stephen David Patterson,&nbsp;Owen Jeffries","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-122081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the inter-day test-retest reliability of the Finapres <sup>®</sup> finger pulse pressure measuring device during rest and exercise. Eight male participants visited the laboratory twice for evaluation of the inter-day reliability of the Finapres <sup>®</sup> finger-pulse pressure device to measure: heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q̇) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at rest, and treadmill walking at 3 km/h on 1% and 5% inclines. There were no systematic biases for any of the variables between days. The coefficient of variation (CV%) and 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) was smallest for MAP (CV%=1.6-3.2%; LoA total error=4.6-12 mmHg) and HR (CV%=3.2-3.9%; LoA total error=6.8-11.9 b/min), increasing with exercise intensity (gradient). The pattern of error was different for Q̇, with decreasing CV% (4.8-3.8%) and LoA (4.2-5.7 L/min) from rest to 5% gradient, with the larger errors occurring for resting SV (CV=7.4%; LoA total error=21.5 ml). The device measures MAP and HR reliably between days; however, error increases at higher intensities. The measurement of SV is less reliable, probably owing to underlying algorithmic assumptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"2 1","pages":"E9-E15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0043-122081","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study evaluated the inter-day test-retest reliability of the Finapres ® finger pulse pressure measuring device during rest and exercise. Eight male participants visited the laboratory twice for evaluation of the inter-day reliability of the Finapres ® finger-pulse pressure device to measure: heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q̇) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at rest, and treadmill walking at 3 km/h on 1% and 5% inclines. There were no systematic biases for any of the variables between days. The coefficient of variation (CV%) and 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) was smallest for MAP (CV%=1.6-3.2%; LoA total error=4.6-12 mmHg) and HR (CV%=3.2-3.9%; LoA total error=6.8-11.9 b/min), increasing with exercise intensity (gradient). The pattern of error was different for Q̇, with decreasing CV% (4.8-3.8%) and LoA (4.2-5.7 L/min) from rest to 5% gradient, with the larger errors occurring for resting SV (CV=7.4%; LoA total error=21.5 ml). The device measures MAP and HR reliably between days; however, error increases at higher intensities. The measurement of SV is less reliable, probably owing to underlying algorithmic assumptions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
休息和运动期间Finapres®心血管测量的日间可靠性。
本研究评估了Finapres®手指脉搏压力测量装置在休息和运动期间的日间测试-重测可靠性。8名男性受试者两次访问实验室,评估Finapres®指脉压装置的日间可靠性,测量心率(HR)、脑卒中量(SV)、心输出量(Q)和平均动脉压(MAP),以及在1%和5%坡度上以3公里/小时的速度在跑步机上行走。在不同的日期之间,任何变量都没有系统偏差。MAP的变异系数(CV%)和95%一致限(95% LoA)最小(CV%=1.6-3.2%;LoA总误差=4.6-12 mmHg)和HR (CV%=3.2-3.9%;LoA总误差=6.8-11.9 b/min),随运动强度(梯度)增大。Q值的误差模式不同,从静止到5%梯度,CV%(4.8 ~ 3.8%)和LoA (4.2 ~ 5.7 L/min)下降,其中静止SV误差较大(CV=7.4%;总误差=21.5 ml)。该设备可以可靠地测量MAP和HR;然而,在较高的强度下,误差增加。SV的测量不太可靠,可能是由于潜在的算法假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Win Your Race Goal: A Generalized Approach to Prediction of Running Performance. Effect of Lower Limb Muscle Fatigue on Dynamic Balance Performance in Healthy Young Adults: Role of Arm Movement. Effects of Exercise-Induced Changes in Myokine Expression on the Tumor Microenvironment. One year of heavy resistance training modifies muscle fiber characteristics in elderly Comparison of Neuromuscular Fatigue in Powerlifting Paralympics in Different Training Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1