Reference PMHS Sled Tests to Assess Submarining of the Small Female.

Q2 Medicine Stapp car crash journal Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.4271/2018-22-0003
Xavier Trosseille, Philippe Petit, Jérôme Uriot, Pascal Potier, Pascal Baudrit, Olivier Richard, Sabine Compigne, Mitsutoshi Masuda, Richard Douard
{"title":"Reference PMHS Sled Tests to Assess Submarining of the Small Female.","authors":"Xavier Trosseille,&nbsp;Philippe Petit,&nbsp;Jérôme Uriot,&nbsp;Pascal Potier,&nbsp;Pascal Baudrit,&nbsp;Olivier Richard,&nbsp;Sabine Compigne,&nbsp;Mitsutoshi Masuda,&nbsp;Richard Douard","doi":"10.4271/2018-22-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last decade, extensive efforts have been made to understand the physics of submarining and its consequences in terms of abdominal injuries. For that purpose, 27 Post Mortem Human Subject (PMHS) tests were performed in well controlled conditions on a sled and response corridors were provided to assess the biofidelity of dummies or human body models. All these efforts were based on the 50th percentile male. In parallel, efforts were initiated to transfer the understanding of submarining and the prediction criteria to the THOR dummies. Both the biofidelity targets and the criteria were scaled down from the 50th percentile male to the 5th percentile THOR female. The objective of this project was to run a set of reference PMHS tests in order to check the biofidelity of the THOR F05 in terms of submarining. Three series of tests were performed on nine PMHS, the first one was designed to avoid submarining, the second and third ones were designed to result in submarining. In the first configuration, no submarining was observed in 3 cases out of 4 and only one iliac wing fracture occurred in one subject. In the second and third configurations, all subjects but one sustained submarining. In addition, two subjects out of three in the third configuration sustained substantial iliac wing fractures. Nevertheless, all configurations can be represented by at least one or several cases without any pelvis fracture. Corridors were constructed for the external forces and the PMHS kinematics. They are provided in this paper as new experimental references to assess the biofidelity of small female human surrogates in different configurations where submarining did or did not occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"62 ","pages":"93-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-22-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the last decade, extensive efforts have been made to understand the physics of submarining and its consequences in terms of abdominal injuries. For that purpose, 27 Post Mortem Human Subject (PMHS) tests were performed in well controlled conditions on a sled and response corridors were provided to assess the biofidelity of dummies or human body models. All these efforts were based on the 50th percentile male. In parallel, efforts were initiated to transfer the understanding of submarining and the prediction criteria to the THOR dummies. Both the biofidelity targets and the criteria were scaled down from the 50th percentile male to the 5th percentile THOR female. The objective of this project was to run a set of reference PMHS tests in order to check the biofidelity of the THOR F05 in terms of submarining. Three series of tests were performed on nine PMHS, the first one was designed to avoid submarining, the second and third ones were designed to result in submarining. In the first configuration, no submarining was observed in 3 cases out of 4 and only one iliac wing fracture occurred in one subject. In the second and third configurations, all subjects but one sustained submarining. In addition, two subjects out of three in the third configuration sustained substantial iliac wing fractures. Nevertheless, all configurations can be represented by at least one or several cases without any pelvis fracture. Corridors were constructed for the external forces and the PMHS kinematics. They are provided in this paper as new experimental references to assess the biofidelity of small female human surrogates in different configurations where submarining did or did not occur.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参考PMHS雪橇试验以评估小雌性的潜行能力。
在过去的十年里,人们已经做出了广泛的努力来了解潜水的物理学及其对腹部损伤的影响。为此目的,在控制良好的条件下,在雪橇上进行了27次人体解剖试验,并提供了反应走廊,以评估假人或人体模型的生物保真度。所有这些努力都是基于第50百分位的男性。与此同时,开始努力将对潜艇和预测标准的理解转移到THOR假人身上。生物保真度指标和标准都从男性的第50百分位缩小到女性的第5百分位。该项目的目的是运行一套参考PMHS测试,以检查THOR F05在潜艇方面的生物保真度。对9种PMHS进行了三次试验,第一次试验旨在避免潜沉,第二次和第三次试验旨在导致潜沉。在第一种构型中,4例中有3例未观察到下沉,1例受试者中仅发生1例髂翼骨折。在第二和第三种情况下,除一人外,所有受试者都在潜行。此外,第三种构型的3名受试者中有2名持续出现严重的髂翼骨折。然而,所有的构型都可以表现为至少一个或几个没有骨盆骨折的病例。构建了用于外部作用力和PMHS运动学的廊道。本文提供了新的实验参考,以评估不同配置的雌性人类替代品的生物保真度,其中有或没有发生潜泳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Child Anthropometries in Relation to Modern Vehicle Seat and Booster Dimensions. Isolated Rib Response and Fracture Prediction for Young Mid-Size Male, Enabled by Population Specific Material Models and Rib Cross-Sectional Geometry. Effects of head restraint (HR) interference on child restraint system (CRS) performance in frontal and far-side impacts. Effect of A-Pillar Blind Spots on a Driver's Pedestrian Visibility during Vehicle Turns at an Intersection. Standardized Assessment of Gravity Settling Human Body Models for Virtual Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1