Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Women Toward Prenatal Genetic Testing.

IF 3.2 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Epigenetics Insights Pub Date : 2018-12-04 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2516865718813122
Nour Abdo, Nadia Ibraheem, Nail Obeidat, Ashley Graboski-Bauer, Anwar Batieha, Nada Altamimi, Moawia Khatatbih
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Women Toward Prenatal Genetic Testing.","authors":"Nour Abdo,&nbsp;Nadia Ibraheem,&nbsp;Nail Obeidat,&nbsp;Ashley Graboski-Bauer,&nbsp;Anwar Batieha,&nbsp;Nada Altamimi,&nbsp;Moawia Khatatbih","doi":"10.1177/2516865718813122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to address public knowledge, attitudes, and practices relative to prenatal genetic testing as a starting point for policy development in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional prenatal genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey with 1111 women recruited at obstetrics and gynecology clinics nationwide. Data were analyzed using a variety of descriptive and inferential statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overwhelming majority (>94%) of participants considered prenatal genetic testing, particularly non-invasive prenatal genetic screening, procedures to be good, comfortable, and reasonable, even when the non-diagnostic nature of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening was explained. Likewise, 95% encouraged the implementation of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening within the Jordanian health system, but most preferred it to remain optional. However, women in higher-risk age brackets, in consanguineous marriages, and with less education were significantly less interested in learning about non-invasive prenatal genetic screening. Only 60% of women interviewed were satisfied with the services provided by their obstetric/gynecologist. The more satisfied the women were, the more they are likely to adapt non-invasive prenatal genetic screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In sum, although the data support the receptivity of Jordanian women to national implementation of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening, such policies should be accompanied by health education to increase the genetic literacy of the population and to engage high-risk populations. Thus, this offers rare insight into the readiness of 1 particular Arab population to adapt non-invasive prenatal genetic screening technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":41996,"journal":{"name":"Epigenetics Insights","volume":"11 ","pages":"2516865718813122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516865718813122","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenetics Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516865718813122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objectives: We aim to address public knowledge, attitudes, and practices relative to prenatal genetic testing as a starting point for policy development in Jordan.

Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional prenatal genetic testing knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey with 1111 women recruited at obstetrics and gynecology clinics nationwide. Data were analyzed using a variety of descriptive and inferential statistical tests.

Results: The overwhelming majority (>94%) of participants considered prenatal genetic testing, particularly non-invasive prenatal genetic screening, procedures to be good, comfortable, and reasonable, even when the non-diagnostic nature of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening was explained. Likewise, 95% encouraged the implementation of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening within the Jordanian health system, but most preferred it to remain optional. However, women in higher-risk age brackets, in consanguineous marriages, and with less education were significantly less interested in learning about non-invasive prenatal genetic screening. Only 60% of women interviewed were satisfied with the services provided by their obstetric/gynecologist. The more satisfied the women were, the more they are likely to adapt non-invasive prenatal genetic screening.

Conclusions: In sum, although the data support the receptivity of Jordanian women to national implementation of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening, such policies should be accompanied by health education to increase the genetic literacy of the population and to engage high-risk populations. Thus, this offers rare insight into the readiness of 1 particular Arab population to adapt non-invasive prenatal genetic screening technologies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女产前基因检测的知识、态度和实践。
目标:我们的目标是解决公众的知识,态度和做法有关产前基因检测作为约旦政策制定的起点。研究设计:我们对全国妇产门诊1111名妇女进行了产前基因检测知识、态度和实践的横断面调查。使用各种描述性和推断性统计检验对数据进行分析。结果:绝大多数(>94%)的参与者认为产前基因检测,特别是无创产前基因筛查,程序是良好的,舒适的,合理的,即使解释了无创产前基因筛查的非诊断性质。同样,95%的人鼓励在约旦卫生系统内实施非侵入性产前遗传筛查,但大多数人更倾向于保留可选性。然而,高风险年龄组、近亲婚姻和受教育程度较低的女性对非侵入性产前基因筛查的兴趣明显较低。只有60%的受访妇女对其产科/妇科医生提供的服务感到满意。女性越满意,她们就越有可能适应非侵入性产前基因筛查。结论:总而言之,尽管数据支持约旦妇女接受国家实施非侵入性产前遗传筛查,但此类政策应伴随着健康教育,以提高人口的遗传素养,并让高危人群参与进来。因此,这提供了罕见的洞察1特定的阿拉伯人口准备适应非侵入性产前遗传筛查技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenetics Insights
Epigenetics Insights GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epigenetics Mechanisms of Honeybees: Secrets of Royal Jelly. Circular RNA in Multiple Sclerosis: Pathogenicity and Potential Biomarker Development: A Systematic Review. Associations Between Epigenetic Age Acceleration and microRNA Expression Among U.S. Firefighters. Subacute and Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review of Epigenetics and Secondary Health Conditions. DNA Methylation in Cancer: Epigenetic View of Dietary and Lifestyle Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1