Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable?

IF 17.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2019-05-07 Epub Date: 2019-01-16 DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505
Colin MacLeod, Ben Grafton, Lies Notebaert
{"title":"Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable?","authors":"Colin MacLeod,&nbsp;Ben Grafton,&nbsp;Lies Notebaert","doi":"10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is substantial evidence that heightened anxiety vulnerability is characterized by increased selective attention to threatening information. The reliability of this anxiety-linked attentional bias has become the focus of considerable recent interest. We distinguish between the potential inconsistency of anxiety-linked attentional bias and inconsistency potentially reflecting the psychometric properties of the assessment approaches used to measure it. Though groups with heightened anxiety vulnerability often exhibit, on average, elevated attention to threat, the evidence suggests that individuals are unlikely to each display a stable, invariant attentional bias to threat. Moreover, although existing assessment approaches can differentiate between groups, they do not exhibit the internal consistency or test-retest reliability necessary to classify individuals in terms of their characteristic pattern of attentional responding to threat. We discuss the appropriate uses of existing attentional bias assessment tasks and propose strategies for enhancing classification of individuals in terms of their tendency to display an attentional bias to threat.</p>","PeriodicalId":50755,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology","volume":"15 ","pages":"529-554"},"PeriodicalIF":17.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that heightened anxiety vulnerability is characterized by increased selective attention to threatening information. The reliability of this anxiety-linked attentional bias has become the focus of considerable recent interest. We distinguish between the potential inconsistency of anxiety-linked attentional bias and inconsistency potentially reflecting the psychometric properties of the assessment approaches used to measure it. Though groups with heightened anxiety vulnerability often exhibit, on average, elevated attention to threat, the evidence suggests that individuals are unlikely to each display a stable, invariant attentional bias to threat. Moreover, although existing assessment approaches can differentiate between groups, they do not exhibit the internal consistency or test-retest reliability necessary to classify individuals in terms of their characteristic pattern of attentional responding to threat. We discuss the appropriate uses of existing attentional bias assessment tasks and propose strategies for enhancing classification of individuals in terms of their tendency to display an attentional bias to threat.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑相关的注意偏差:可靠吗?
有大量证据表明,高度焦虑脆弱性的特征是对威胁信息的选择性关注增加。这种与焦虑相关的注意力偏差的可靠性已成为最近相当关注的焦点。我们区分了与焦虑相关的注意偏差的潜在不一致性和潜在反映用于测量它的评估方法的心理测量特性的不一致性。尽管焦虑脆弱程度较高的群体通常表现出对威胁的平均关注度较高,但有证据表明,个体不太可能每个人都表现出对威胁的稳定、不变的注意偏见。此外,尽管现有的评估方法可以区分不同的群体,但它们并没有表现出内部一致性或测试-重测信度,这是根据个体对威胁的注意反应的特征模式对个体进行分类所必需的。我们讨论了现有注意偏倚评估任务的适当使用,并提出了加强个体对威胁表现出注意偏倚倾向的分类策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
31.50
自引率
0.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology is a publication that has been available since 2005. It offers comprehensive reviews on significant developments in the field of clinical psychology and psychiatry. The journal covers various aspects including research, theory, and the application of psychological principles to address recognized disorders such as schizophrenia, mood, anxiety, childhood, substance use, cognitive, and personality disorders. Additionally, the articles also touch upon broader issues that cut across the field, such as diagnosis, treatment, social policy, and cross-cultural and legal issues. Recently, the current volume of this journal has transitioned from a gated access model to an open access format through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. All articles published in this volume are now available under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing for widespread distribution and use. The journal is also abstracted and indexed in various databases including Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search, among others.
期刊最新文献
Autism Spectrum Disorder Across the Lifespan Personality Disorders: Current Conceptualizations and Challenges Stress and Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Affective Traits and Mental Disorders Pathways to Racial/Ethnic Inequalities in Dementia Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder Stigma: Mapping Pathways Between Structures and Individuals to Accelerate Research and Intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1