Diabetes Educators Beliefs About Patient Self-Management and Strategies Used to Support Persons With Diabetes.

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions Diabetes Educator Pub Date : 2019-04-01 Epub Date: 2019-01-18 DOI:10.1177/0145721718825356
Julie Peila Gee, John Scarbrough, Dawn Bowker, Teresa Keller
{"title":"Diabetes Educators Beliefs About Patient Self-Management and Strategies Used to Support Persons With Diabetes.","authors":"Julie Peila Gee, John Scarbrough, Dawn Bowker, Teresa Keller","doi":"10.1177/0145721718825356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine diabetes educators’ beliefs about the importance of patients’ role in self-management and the relationship between educator-reported strategies used to support patients with diabetes. Methods Using a descriptive, cross-sectional study design, diabetes educators’ (n = 225) beliefs toward self-management were assessed using the Clinician Support–Patient Activation Measure 13 (CS-PAM). Support strategies were assessed using the Clinician Self-Management Scale (SMS). Results The CS-PAM score for diabetes educators ranged from 56.1 to 100.0. The SMS scores ranged from 2.44 to 5.00. Educators’ beliefs and support strategies used in clinical encounters were significantly correlated. Bivariate analysis and multiple linear regression demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the beliefs of and support strategies used by educators and their characteristics. Conclusions Findings suggest that the majority of diabetes educators highly support and embrace patients’ participation in their own care. Educators who are more supportive of patients in self-managing are more likely to use effective support strategies, as measured by the SMS, thereby fostering a sense of patient ownership in their own care and promoting behavioral change that may lead to improved health outcomes. The lack of statistical significance between the educators’ beliefs and support strategies used and personal characteristics points to clinical implications in that diabetes educators are well aligned in the care of persons with diabetes.","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721718825356","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721718825356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine diabetes educators’ beliefs about the importance of patients’ role in self-management and the relationship between educator-reported strategies used to support patients with diabetes. Methods Using a descriptive, cross-sectional study design, diabetes educators’ (n = 225) beliefs toward self-management were assessed using the Clinician Support–Patient Activation Measure 13 (CS-PAM). Support strategies were assessed using the Clinician Self-Management Scale (SMS). Results The CS-PAM score for diabetes educators ranged from 56.1 to 100.0. The SMS scores ranged from 2.44 to 5.00. Educators’ beliefs and support strategies used in clinical encounters were significantly correlated. Bivariate analysis and multiple linear regression demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the beliefs of and support strategies used by educators and their characteristics. Conclusions Findings suggest that the majority of diabetes educators highly support and embrace patients’ participation in their own care. Educators who are more supportive of patients in self-managing are more likely to use effective support strategies, as measured by the SMS, thereby fostering a sense of patient ownership in their own care and promoting behavioral change that may lead to improved health outcomes. The lack of statistical significance between the educators’ beliefs and support strategies used and personal characteristics points to clinical implications in that diabetes educators are well aligned in the care of persons with diabetes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病教育者关于患者自我管理的信念和用于支持糖尿病患者的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Educator
Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Di­abetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary pro­fession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.
期刊最新文献
Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Tokoh dan Ajaran Tasawuf Sufi Besar Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Pada Materi Kalimat Thayyibah di Kelas III MI Salafiyah Syafi’iyah Proto 01 Kabupaten Pekalongan Menanamkan Sikap Sopan Santun Melalui Pendidikan Karakter Pada Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Mengenai Materi Adab Santun dan Menghargai Teman di Kelas 2 MISJanggala 2 Kecamatan Cidolog Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fikih Materi Shalat Jamak dan Qashar Melalui Metode Modeling The Way Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Pendistribusian Zakat Secara Produktif Dalam Islam Pada Fase E Kelas X SMKS Garudaya Bontonmpo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1