Use of Mastectomy for Overdiagnosed Breast Cancer in the United States: Analysis of the SEER 9 Cancer Registries.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Epidemiology Pub Date : 2019-01-22 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/5072506
C Harding, F Pompei, D Burmistrov, R Wilson
{"title":"Use of Mastectomy for Overdiagnosed Breast Cancer in the United States: Analysis of the SEER 9 Cancer Registries.","authors":"C Harding,&nbsp;F Pompei,&nbsp;D Burmistrov,&nbsp;R Wilson","doi":"10.1155/2019/5072506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We investigated use of mastectomy as treatment for early breast cancer in the US and applied the resulting information to estimate the minimum and maximum rates at which mastectomy could plausibly be undergone by patients with overdiagnosed breast cancer. Little is currently known about overtreatments undergone by overdiagnosed patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the US, screening is often recommended at ages ≥40. The study population was women age ≥40 diagnosed with breast cancer in the US SEER 9 cancer registries during 2013 (n=26,017). We evaluated first-course surgical treatments and their associations with case characteristics. Additionally, a model was developed to estimate probability of mastectomy conditional on observed case characteristics. The model was then applied to evaluate possible rates of mastectomy in overdiagnosed patients. To obtain minimum and maximum plausible rates of this overtreatment, we respectively assumed the cases that were least and most likely to be treated by mastectomy had been overdiagnosed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≥40 in 2013, 33.8% received mastectomy. Mastectomy was common for most investigated breast cancer types, including for the early breast cancers among which overdiagnosis is thought to be most widespread: mastectomy was undergone in 26.4% of <i>in situ</i> and 28.0% of AJCC stage-I cases. These rates are substantively higher than in many European nations. The probability-based model indicated that between >0% and <18% of the study population could plausibly have undergone mastectomy for overdiagnosed cancer. This range reduced depending on the overdiagnosis rate, shrinking to >0% and <7% if 10% of breast cancers were overdiagnosed and >3% and <15% if 30% were overdiagnosed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening-associated overtreatment by mastectomy is considerably less common than overdiagnosis itself but should not be assumed to be negligible. Screening can prompt or prevent mastectomy, and the balance of this harm-benefit tradeoff is currently unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":15366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/5072506","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5072506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Aim: We investigated use of mastectomy as treatment for early breast cancer in the US and applied the resulting information to estimate the minimum and maximum rates at which mastectomy could plausibly be undergone by patients with overdiagnosed breast cancer. Little is currently known about overtreatments undergone by overdiagnosed patients.

Methods: In the US, screening is often recommended at ages ≥40. The study population was women age ≥40 diagnosed with breast cancer in the US SEER 9 cancer registries during 2013 (n=26,017). We evaluated first-course surgical treatments and their associations with case characteristics. Additionally, a model was developed to estimate probability of mastectomy conditional on observed case characteristics. The model was then applied to evaluate possible rates of mastectomy in overdiagnosed patients. To obtain minimum and maximum plausible rates of this overtreatment, we respectively assumed the cases that were least and most likely to be treated by mastectomy had been overdiagnosed.

Results: Of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age ≥40 in 2013, 33.8% received mastectomy. Mastectomy was common for most investigated breast cancer types, including for the early breast cancers among which overdiagnosis is thought to be most widespread: mastectomy was undergone in 26.4% of in situ and 28.0% of AJCC stage-I cases. These rates are substantively higher than in many European nations. The probability-based model indicated that between >0% and <18% of the study population could plausibly have undergone mastectomy for overdiagnosed cancer. This range reduced depending on the overdiagnosis rate, shrinking to >0% and <7% if 10% of breast cancers were overdiagnosed and >3% and <15% if 30% were overdiagnosed.

Conclusions: Screening-associated overtreatment by mastectomy is considerably less common than overdiagnosis itself but should not be assumed to be negligible. Screening can prompt or prevent mastectomy, and the balance of this harm-benefit tradeoff is currently unclear.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国,乳房切除术治疗过度诊断的乳腺癌:对SEER 9癌症登记的分析。
目的:我们调查了美国使用乳房切除术作为早期乳腺癌治疗的情况,并应用结果信息来估计过度诊断乳腺癌患者可能接受乳房切除术的最小和最大比率。目前对过度诊断的患者所接受的过度治疗知之甚少。方法:在美国,筛查通常推荐年龄≥40岁。研究人群为2013年在美国SEER 9癌症登记处诊断为乳腺癌的年龄≥40岁的女性(n=26,017)。我们评估了第一期手术治疗及其与病例特征的关系。此外,还建立了一个模型,根据观察到的病例特征来估计乳房切除术的可能性。该模型随后被用于评估过度诊断患者乳房切除术的可能性。为了获得这种过度治疗的最小和最大似是而非的比率,我们分别假设最不可能和最有可能通过乳房切除术治疗的病例被过度诊断。结果:2013年年龄≥40岁诊断为乳腺癌的女性中,33.8%接受了乳房切除术。乳房切除术在大多数被调查的乳腺癌类型中都很常见,包括早期乳腺癌,其中过度诊断被认为是最普遍的:26.4%的原位乳腺癌和28.0%的AJCC i期乳腺癌患者接受了乳房切除术。这些比率大大高于许多欧洲国家。基于概率的模型显示在>0%到0%和3%之间。结论:筛查相关的乳房切除术过度治疗比过度诊断本身要少得多,但不应认为可以忽略不计。筛查可以促进或预防乳房切除术,目前尚不清楚这种利弊权衡的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, and clinical studies in all areas of cancer epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
The Global Trends of Thyroid Cancer Research: A Scientometric Study. Significant Association of PD-L1 With CD44 Expression and Patient Survival: Avenues for Immunotherapy and Cancer Stem Cells Downregulation in Pancreatic Cancers. High Incidence of Esophageal Cancer in Women in Eritrea and Its Potential Link to Low Age at Menopause: Evidence from a 10-Year Retrospective Data Analysis. The Trends and Risk Factors of AIDS-Defining Cancers and Non-AIDS-Defining Cancers in Adults Living with and without HIV: A Narrative Review Knowledge, Awareness, and Practices toward Colorectal Cancer and Its Dietary and Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors among Jordanian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1