Effect of Cyclic Loading on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study.

Mohammad Moslem Imani, Farzaneh Aghajani, Nafiseh Momeni, Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad Akhoundi
{"title":"Effect of Cyclic Loading on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Mohammad Moslem Imani,&nbsp;Farzaneh Aghajani,&nbsp;Nafiseh Momeni,&nbsp;Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad Akhoundi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In clinical conditions, orthodontic brackets are exposed to periodic stresses mainly induced by mastication and intraoral forces. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cyclic loading to simulate masticatory forces on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to teeth using self-etch and total-etch bonding systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-four caries- and crack-free bovine mandibular incisors were selected and randomly assigned to two groups based on the type of bonding system. After bonding, all samples were thermocycled (500 cycles) followed by cyclic loading of the half of the specimens in each group by applying 40 N load with 2 Hz frequency for 10,000 cycles. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was calculated subsequently. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, two-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SBS was 10.09±3.78 MPa and 14.44±6.06 MPa for self-etch and total-etch bonding systems in cyclic loading group, respectively. The SBS was 9.43±5.3 MPa and 11.31±5.42 MPa in self-etch and total-etch groups without cyclic loading, respectively. Cyclic loading did not cause any significant difference in SBS (P>0.05). The ARI scores of the groups were significantly different (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present results demonstrated that low masticatory forces at 10,000 cycles did not have a significant impact on bracket-adhesive SBS; however, they significantly changed the ARI score. Even though the total-etch bonding system yielded higher SBS than the self-etch system, the performance of both was clinically acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":30286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In clinical conditions, orthodontic brackets are exposed to periodic stresses mainly induced by mastication and intraoral forces. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cyclic loading to simulate masticatory forces on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to teeth using self-etch and total-etch bonding systems.

Materials and methods: Eighty-four caries- and crack-free bovine mandibular incisors were selected and randomly assigned to two groups based on the type of bonding system. After bonding, all samples were thermocycled (500 cycles) followed by cyclic loading of the half of the specimens in each group by applying 40 N load with 2 Hz frequency for 10,000 cycles. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was calculated subsequently. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, two-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test.

Results: The SBS was 10.09±3.78 MPa and 14.44±6.06 MPa for self-etch and total-etch bonding systems in cyclic loading group, respectively. The SBS was 9.43±5.3 MPa and 11.31±5.42 MPa in self-etch and total-etch groups without cyclic loading, respectively. Cyclic loading did not cause any significant difference in SBS (P>0.05). The ARI scores of the groups were significantly different (P<0.05).

Conclusions: The present results demonstrated that low masticatory forces at 10,000 cycles did not have a significant impact on bracket-adhesive SBS; however, they significantly changed the ARI score. Even though the total-etch bonding system yielded higher SBS than the self-etch system, the performance of both was clinically acceptable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环载荷对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度影响的体外研究。
目的:在临床条件下,正畸托槽暴露于主要由咀嚼和口内力引起的周期性应力中。本研究的目的是评估循环加载模拟咀嚼力对自蚀刻和全蚀刻粘接系统金属托槽与牙齿粘接剪切强度(SBS)的影响。材料与方法:选取84颗无龋裂的牛下颌切牙,根据粘接系统的类型随机分为两组。粘接后,对所有试样进行热循环(500次循环),然后对每组一半试样进行循环加载,施加40 N、2 Hz频率的载荷,循环加载10,000次。SBS是用通用试验机测量的。随后计算黏合剂残余指数(ARI)评分。数据分析采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验、双向方差分析和Mann-Whitney检验。结果:循环加载组自蚀刻和全蚀刻粘接系统的SBS分别为10.09±3.78 MPa和14.44±6.06 MPa。无循环加载的自蚀刻组和全蚀刻组的SBS分别为9.43±5.3 MPa和11.31±5.42 MPa。循环负荷对SBS无显著影响(P>0.05)。结论:1万次低咀嚼力对支架粘接剂SBS无显著影响;然而,他们显著改变了ARI评分。尽管全蚀刻结合系统比自蚀刻系统产生更高的SBS,但两者的性能在临床上都是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Polymerization Shrinkage of Five Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Comparison with a Conventional Composite Resin. Effect of Storage Time of a Ceramic Primer on Microshear Bond Strength to Zirconia. Evaluation of the Effect of MTAD on Expression of Enterococcus faecalis Virulence Factors Considering the Role of Different Obturating Materials. Extraskeletal Ewing Sarcoma: Report of an Extremely Rare Case in Temporal Region. Evaluation of the Prevalence of Temporomandibular Joint Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1