Rules Are Meant To Be Broken: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Should Allow Pediatric Transplantation of Adult Lungs.

Journal of law and health Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Ciera Parish
{"title":"Rules Are Meant To Be Broken: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Should Allow Pediatric Transplantation of Adult Lungs.","authors":"Ciera Parish","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This note analyzes the \"Under 12 Rule\" and advocates for its abolishment by examining the consequences and discrimination faced by children under the age of twelve since its enactment in 2005 as well as the benefits stemming from the allowance of using adult lungs for pediatric transplantation. Part II discusses the history of organ transplantation law and the current organ transplantation laws as they stand. Part III provides statistical data demonstrating the disparity between pediatric lung transplant candidates and adult lung transplant candidates. Part IV discusses the reasons for the implementation of the \"Under 12 Rule\" and analyzes the emerging study associated with the benefits of a lung transplantation using larger lungs. Part V discusses the litigation that ensued due to the \"Under 12 Rule\" and the legal arguments that were raised. Part VI proposes a new regulation for the pediatric allocation of donor lungs, and Part VII concludes this Note, advocating for the abolishment of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network's \"Under 12 Rule.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":73804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of law and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of law and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note analyzes the "Under 12 Rule" and advocates for its abolishment by examining the consequences and discrimination faced by children under the age of twelve since its enactment in 2005 as well as the benefits stemming from the allowance of using adult lungs for pediatric transplantation. Part II discusses the history of organ transplantation law and the current organ transplantation laws as they stand. Part III provides statistical data demonstrating the disparity between pediatric lung transplant candidates and adult lung transplant candidates. Part IV discusses the reasons for the implementation of the "Under 12 Rule" and analyzes the emerging study associated with the benefits of a lung transplantation using larger lungs. Part V discusses the litigation that ensued due to the "Under 12 Rule" and the legal arguments that were raised. Part VI proposes a new regulation for the pediatric allocation of donor lungs, and Part VII concludes this Note, advocating for the abolishment of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network's "Under 12 Rule."

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规则注定要被打破:器官获取和移植网络应该允许儿童移植成人肺。
本文分析了“12岁以下规则”,并通过审查自2005年颁布以来12岁以下儿童所面临的后果和歧视,以及允许使用成人肺进行儿童移植所带来的好处,倡导废除该规则。第二部分讨论了器官移植法的历史和现行器官移植法的现状。第三部分提供了统计数据,证明了儿童肺移植候选人和成人肺移植候选人之间的差异。第四部分讨论了实施“12岁以下规则”的原因,并分析了与使用更大肺进行肺移植的益处相关的新兴研究。第五部分讨论了因“12岁以下规则”而引发的诉讼以及由此引发的法律争论。第六部分提出了一项关于儿童供体肺分配的新规定,第七部分总结了本文,主张废除器官获取和移植网络的“12岁以下规则”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice. Distorted Burden Shifting and Barred Mitigation: Being a Stubborn 234 Years Old Ironically Hasn't Helped the Supreme Court Mature. How Bodily Autonomy Can Fail Against Vaccination Mandates: The Few vs. the Many. When Governors Prioritize Individual Freedom over Public Health: Tort Liability for Government Failures. Without Due Process of Law: The Dobbs Decision and Its Cataclysmic Impact on the Substantive Due Process and Privacy Rights of Ohio Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1