I want to talk to a real person: theorising avoidance in the acceptance and use of automated technologies.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-12 DOI:10.1080/20476965.2017.1406568
Katheryn R Christy, Jakob D Jensen, Brian Britt, Courtney L Scherr, Christina Jones, Natasha R Brown
{"title":"I want to talk to a real person: theorising avoidance in the acceptance and use of automated technologies.","authors":"Katheryn R Christy,&nbsp;Jakob D Jensen,&nbsp;Brian Britt,&nbsp;Courtney L Scherr,&nbsp;Christina Jones,&nbsp;Natasha R Brown","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2017.1406568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automated communication systems are increasingly common in mobile and ehealth contexts. Yet, there is reason to believe that some high risk segments of the population might be prone to avoid automated systems even though they are often designed to reach these groups. To facilitate research in this area, avoidance of automated communication (AAC) is theorized - and a measurement instrument validated - across two studies. In study 1, an AAC scale was found to be unidimensional and internally reliable as well as negatively correlated with comfort, perceptions, and intentions to use technology. Moreover, individuals with social phobia had lower AAC scores which was consistent with the idea that they preferred non-human interaction facilitated by automated communication. In study 2, confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the measure and the instrument once again proved to be reliable. Individuals with lower AAC had greater intentions to utilize automated communication, EHRs, and an automated virtual nurse program. AAC is a disposition that predicts significant variance in intentions and comfort with various automated communication technologies. Avoidance increases with age but may be mitigated by systems that allow participants to opt-out or immediately interact with a live person.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":"31-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2017.1406568","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2017.1406568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated communication systems are increasingly common in mobile and ehealth contexts. Yet, there is reason to believe that some high risk segments of the population might be prone to avoid automated systems even though they are often designed to reach these groups. To facilitate research in this area, avoidance of automated communication (AAC) is theorized - and a measurement instrument validated - across two studies. In study 1, an AAC scale was found to be unidimensional and internally reliable as well as negatively correlated with comfort, perceptions, and intentions to use technology. Moreover, individuals with social phobia had lower AAC scores which was consistent with the idea that they preferred non-human interaction facilitated by automated communication. In study 2, confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the measure and the instrument once again proved to be reliable. Individuals with lower AAC had greater intentions to utilize automated communication, EHRs, and an automated virtual nurse program. AAC is a disposition that predicts significant variance in intentions and comfort with various automated communication technologies. Avoidance increases with age but may be mitigated by systems that allow participants to opt-out or immediately interact with a live person.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我想和一个真实的人谈谈:在接受和使用自动化技术时的回避理论。
自动化通信系统在移动和电子环境中越来越普遍。然而,有理由相信,一些高风险人群可能倾向于避免使用自动化系统,尽管这些系统通常是为这些群体设计的。为了促进这一领域的研究,在两项研究中,对避免自动通信(AAC)进行了理论化,并对测量仪器进行了验证。在研究1中,AAC量表被发现是一维的,内部可靠,并且与舒适度、感知和使用技术的意图呈负相关。此外,社交恐惧症患者的AAC得分较低,这与他们更喜欢自动化沟通促进的非人类互动的想法一致。在研究2中,验证性因素分析支持了该测量的一维结构,该仪器再次被证明是可靠的。AAC较低的个体更倾向于使用自动化通信、EHR和自动化虚拟护士计划。AAC是一种预测各种自动化通信技术在意图和舒适度方面存在显著差异的倾向。回避会随着年龄的增长而增加,但可以通过允许参与者选择退出或立即与活体互动的系统来减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Towards new frontiers of healthcare systems research using artificial intelligence and generative AI. Assistance systems for patient positioning in radiotherapy practice. Resilience of hospitals in an age of disruptions: a systematic literature review on resources and capabilities. From digital health to learning health systems: four approaches to using data for digital health design. Using participatory systems approaches to improve healthcare delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1