Pharmaceutical intervention after evaluation of the risk of ictus in elderly patients institutionalized with atrial fibrillation.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2019-05-24 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2048004019848273
Alberto Frutos Pérez-Surio, Roberto Lozano Ortiz, Alejandro Martínez Crespo
{"title":"Pharmaceutical intervention after evaluation of the risk of ictus in elderly patients institutionalized with atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Alberto Frutos Pérez-Surio,&nbsp;Roberto Lozano Ortiz,&nbsp;Alejandro Martínez Crespo","doi":"10.1177/2048004019848273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the risk of having a stroke and the risk of bleeding in institutionalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac arrhythmia associated with increased morbidity and mortality. It is necessary to develop pharmacotherapy plans to minimize the risk.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Institutionalized patients.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Inclusion criteria were: patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, with or without treatment for the prevention of stroke.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The evaluation of the CHA2DS2-VASc criteria was performed. The risk of hemorrhage was assessed using the HAS-BLED scale, based on the risk factors associated with the probability of bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 53 patients (86.4 ± 6.4 years, 30.2% men). Of these, 37 (69.8%) were correctly anticoagulated. Of the remaining, 5 patients (31.2%) did not have any type of anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment and 11 (68.7%) were treated with antiaggregant alone. The pharmaceutical intervention was performed in patients who did not meet stroke criteria. Of the untreated patients: two died before the intervention, two were recommended to be referred to cardiology and in one there was no intervention because of very advanced age. In the antiaggregant patients, it was decided not to modify the treatment. The reasons were: high risk of bleeding, very advanced age, advanced dementia or terminal illness, moderate risk of stroke, and clotting factor deficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of stroke in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation is high, so it is important to control the risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"8 ","pages":"2048004019848273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004019848273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004019848273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the risk of having a stroke and the risk of bleeding in institutionalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac arrhythmia associated with increased morbidity and mortality. It is necessary to develop pharmacotherapy plans to minimize the risk.

Design: A prospective study.

Setting: Institutionalized patients.

Participants: Inclusion criteria were: patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, with or without treatment for the prevention of stroke.

Main outcome measures: The evaluation of the CHA2DS2-VASc criteria was performed. The risk of hemorrhage was assessed using the HAS-BLED scale, based on the risk factors associated with the probability of bleeding.

Results: We included 53 patients (86.4 ± 6.4 years, 30.2% men). Of these, 37 (69.8%) were correctly anticoagulated. Of the remaining, 5 patients (31.2%) did not have any type of anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment and 11 (68.7%) were treated with antiaggregant alone. The pharmaceutical intervention was performed in patients who did not meet stroke criteria. Of the untreated patients: two died before the intervention, two were recommended to be referred to cardiology and in one there was no intervention because of very advanced age. In the antiaggregant patients, it was decided not to modify the treatment. The reasons were: high risk of bleeding, very advanced age, advanced dementia or terminal illness, moderate risk of stroke, and clotting factor deficiency.

Conclusions: The risk of stroke in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation is high, so it is important to control the risk factors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年房颤住院患者突厥风险评估后的药物干预。
目的:评价房颤住院患者发生卒中和出血的风险。心房颤动是一种常见的心律失常,发病率和死亡率增高。有必要制定药物治疗计划,以尽量减少风险。设计:前瞻性研究。环境:住院病人。受试者:纳入标准为:诊断为房颤的患者,接受或未接受预防卒中的治疗。主要观察指标:对CHA2DS2-VASc标准进行评价。根据与出血概率相关的危险因素,使用HAS-BLED量表评估出血风险。结果:纳入53例患者(86.4±6.4岁,男性30.2%)。其中37例(69.8%)正确抗凝。其余5例(31.2%)患者未接受任何类型的抗凝或抗聚集治疗,11例(68.7%)患者仅接受抗聚集治疗。对不符合脑卒中标准的患者进行药物干预。在未接受治疗的患者中:2人在干预前死亡,2人被推荐转介心脏病学,1人因年事已高而没有进行干预。在抗聚集患者中,决定不改变治疗方法。原因是:出血风险高、高龄、晚期痴呆或晚期疾病、中等中风风险和凝血因子缺乏。结论:老年房颤患者发生脑卒中的危险较高,应控制危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biplane 3D overlay guidance for congenital heart disease to assist cardiac catheterization interventions-A pilot study. Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis. Metabolic syndrome and its associated factors among adults with cardiac diseases: A cross-sectional comparative group study. Causal roles of immune cells in cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Associations of variability in body mass index with cardiovascular outcomes in the general population: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1