From Many to One to Many-the Search for Causes of Psychiatric Illness.

IF 17.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY JAMA Psychiatry Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1200
Kenneth S Kendler
{"title":"From Many to One to Many-the Search for Causes of Psychiatric Illness.","authors":"Kenneth S Kendler","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The search for the causes of medical and psychiatric disorders has gone through 3 historical phases. First, up until the mid-19th century, causes of illness were anecdotally recorded from individual cases, resulting in long and diverse lists for all disorders. Second, in the latter half of the 19th century, with the use of microbiological methods, single causes were found for many infectious diseases that led to specific diagnostic tests, effective preventions, and, in some cases, treatments. Causal thinking in medicine shifted from the earlier multicausal approaches to monocausal theories of etiology. Indeed, proving monocausal etiology became a way to establish the legitimacy of a disorder. Through the writings of Kahlbaum and Hecker, psychiatry was deeply influenced by this monocausal perspective, the importance of which was substantially amplified by a twist of fate: the increasing clinical importance of general paresis of the insane throughout the 19th century and the eventual proof that it too was a monocausal condition. However, in the mid-20th century, the third phase began. With decreasing deaths from infectious diseases, epidemiology and clinical medicine shifted to a chronic disease model in which paradigmatic disorders, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease, were shown to be highly multicausal. Biostatistics evolved from deterministic to probabilistic models of disease risk factors. Paradoxically, at this time, biological psychiatry, then rising to dominance in American psychiatry, vigorously pursued monocausal theories, first of neurochemical origin and then of genetic origin. We were trying to establish the legitimacy of our field by pursuing an outmoded model-that \"real\" diseases are monocausal. Despite ample evidence to the contrary, monocausal thinking continues to influence our field, for example, in the popular but improbable view that we can, with a few key advances, move easily from descriptive to etiologically based diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1085-1091"},"PeriodicalIF":17.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1200","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

The search for the causes of medical and psychiatric disorders has gone through 3 historical phases. First, up until the mid-19th century, causes of illness were anecdotally recorded from individual cases, resulting in long and diverse lists for all disorders. Second, in the latter half of the 19th century, with the use of microbiological methods, single causes were found for many infectious diseases that led to specific diagnostic tests, effective preventions, and, in some cases, treatments. Causal thinking in medicine shifted from the earlier multicausal approaches to monocausal theories of etiology. Indeed, proving monocausal etiology became a way to establish the legitimacy of a disorder. Through the writings of Kahlbaum and Hecker, psychiatry was deeply influenced by this monocausal perspective, the importance of which was substantially amplified by a twist of fate: the increasing clinical importance of general paresis of the insane throughout the 19th century and the eventual proof that it too was a monocausal condition. However, in the mid-20th century, the third phase began. With decreasing deaths from infectious diseases, epidemiology and clinical medicine shifted to a chronic disease model in which paradigmatic disorders, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease, were shown to be highly multicausal. Biostatistics evolved from deterministic to probabilistic models of disease risk factors. Paradoxically, at this time, biological psychiatry, then rising to dominance in American psychiatry, vigorously pursued monocausal theories, first of neurochemical origin and then of genetic origin. We were trying to establish the legitimacy of our field by pursuing an outmoded model-that "real" diseases are monocausal. Despite ample evidence to the contrary, monocausal thinking continues to influence our field, for example, in the popular but improbable view that we can, with a few key advances, move easily from descriptive to etiologically based diagnoses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从多到一到多——寻找精神疾病的原因。
对医学和精神疾病病因的研究经历了三个历史阶段。首先,直到19世纪中期,疾病的原因都是根据个别病例记录的,导致所有疾病的清单都很长,而且种类繁多。其次,在19世纪后半叶,随着微生物学方法的使用,许多传染病的单一原因被发现,从而导致了特定的诊断测试,有效的预防,在某些情况下,治疗。医学中的因果思维从早期的多因果方法转向了病因学的单因果理论。事实上,证明单原因病因学成为确立疾病合法性的一种方式。通过Kahlbaum和Hecker的著作,精神病学深受这种单原因观点的影响,这种观点的重要性被命运的转折大大放大了:在整个19世纪,精神病人的全局性麻痹的临床重要性不断增加,最终证明它也是一种单原因疾病。然而,在20世纪中期,第三阶段开始了。随着传染病死亡人数的减少,流行病学和临床医学转向一种慢性病模型,在这种模型中,癌症和心血管疾病等典型疾病显示出高度的多因果性。生物统计学从疾病危险因素的确定性模型发展到概率模型。矛盾的是,在这个时候,生物精神病学,在美国精神病学中占据主导地位,大力追求单因果理论,首先是神经化学的起源,然后是基因的起源。我们试图通过追求一种过时的模型——“真正的”疾病是单原因的——来建立我们领域的合法性。尽管有大量相反的证据,单因果思维继续影响着我们的领域,例如,在一种流行但不太可能的观点中,我们可以通过一些关键的进展,轻松地从描述性诊断转向基于病因的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Spirituality and Harmful or Hazardous Alcohol and Other Drug Use Predicting Adolescent Response to School-Based Mindfulness Efficacy and Safety of the Neuroplastogen TSND-201 for the Treatment of PTSD Development of Major Depressive Disorder-Does Insulin Resistance Play a Role?-Reply. Development of Major Depressive Disorder-Does Insulin Resistance Play a Role?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1