Surotomycin (A Novel Cyclic Lipopeptide) vs. Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Current clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1574884714666190328162637
Aziz Muhammad, Desai Madhav, Fatima Rawish, Thoguluva C Viveksandeep, Eid Albert, Jackson Mollie, Sharma Prateek
{"title":"Surotomycin (A Novel Cyclic Lipopeptide) vs. Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Aziz Muhammad,&nbsp;Desai Madhav,&nbsp;Fatima Rawish,&nbsp;Thoguluva C Viveksandeep,&nbsp;Eid Albert,&nbsp;Jackson Mollie,&nbsp;Sharma Prateek","doi":"10.2174/1574884714666190328162637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend the use of vancomycin for the initial treatment of moderate to severe Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI). Surotomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been utilized for the management of CDI with variable results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed using the following electronic databases [Medline, Embase, google scholar and Cochrane] for eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing Surotomycin with Vancomycin for the CDI treatment were included. Demographic variables and outcomes (CDI resolution, CDI recurrence, B1/NAP1/027-specific strain treatment, B1/NAP1/027-strain recurrence, death not related to treatment) were analyzed. The primary outcome was clinical cure rate defined as the resolution of CDI at the end of the 10-day drug course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1280 patients with CDI who received either surotomycin 250 mg twice daily (642 patients) or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily (638 patients). Clinical cure rates after 10 days of treatment with either surotomycin or vancomycin were not significantly different (pooled OR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.18, p=0.41). Sustained clinical response at clinical follow-up and the overall recurrence of CDI were also not significantly different between the two groups - pooled OR 1.15 (95% CI 0.89-1.50, p=0.29) and pooled OR 0.74 (95%CI 0.52- 1.04, p=0.08), respectively. With regards to the NAP1/BI/027 strain, patients in the surotomycin group had significantly lower rates of recurrence compared to vancomycin (pooled OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.63, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surotomycin is non-inferior to vancomycin and offers a promising alternative for the treatment and prevention of C. diff infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10746,"journal":{"name":"Current clinical pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1574884714666190328162637","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884714666190328162637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend the use of vancomycin for the initial treatment of moderate to severe Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI). Surotomycin, a novel antibiotic, has been utilized for the management of CDI with variable results.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the following electronic databases [Medline, Embase, google scholar and Cochrane] for eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing Surotomycin with Vancomycin for the CDI treatment were included. Demographic variables and outcomes (CDI resolution, CDI recurrence, B1/NAP1/027-specific strain treatment, B1/NAP1/027-strain recurrence, death not related to treatment) were analyzed. The primary outcome was clinical cure rate defined as the resolution of CDI at the end of the 10-day drug course.

Results: Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1280 patients with CDI who received either surotomycin 250 mg twice daily (642 patients) or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily (638 patients). Clinical cure rates after 10 days of treatment with either surotomycin or vancomycin were not significantly different (pooled OR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.18, p=0.41). Sustained clinical response at clinical follow-up and the overall recurrence of CDI were also not significantly different between the two groups - pooled OR 1.15 (95% CI 0.89-1.50, p=0.29) and pooled OR 0.74 (95%CI 0.52- 1.04, p=0.08), respectively. With regards to the NAP1/BI/027 strain, patients in the surotomycin group had significantly lower rates of recurrence compared to vancomycin (pooled OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.63, p<0.01).

Conclusion: Surotomycin is non-inferior to vancomycin and offers a promising alternative for the treatment and prevention of C. diff infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏洛霉素(一种新型环状脂肽)与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:目前的指南推荐使用万古霉素作为中度至重度艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的初始治疗。苏洛霉素是一种新型抗生素,已被用于治疗CDI,结果不一。方法:使用以下电子数据库[Medline, Embase, google scholar和Cochrane]进行系统的文献检索,寻找符合条件的研究。随机对照试验比较苏洛霉素和万古霉素治疗CDI。统计变量和结果(CDI缓解、CDI复发、B1/ nap1 /027特异性菌株治疗、B1/ nap1 /027菌株复发、与治疗无关的死亡)进行分析。主要终点是临床治愈率,定义为10天药物疗程结束时CDI的消退。结果:3项rct符合纳入标准,共纳入1280例CDI患者,其中642例患者接受苏洛霉素250 mg每日2次或万古霉素125 mg每日4次(638例患者)。苏洛霉素和万古霉素治疗10天后的临床治愈率差异无统计学意义(合并or: 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.18, p=0.41)。两组临床随访时的持续临床反应和CDI的总复发率也无显著差异,合并OR分别为1.15 (95%CI 0.89-1.50, p=0.29)和0.74 (95%CI 0.52- 1.04, p=0.08)。对于NAP1/BI/027菌株,苏罗霉素组患者的复发率明显低于万古霉素组(合并OR为0.35,95% CI为0.19-0.63,p)。结论:苏罗霉素不低于万古霉素,为治疗和预防C. diff感染提供了一种有希望的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current clinical pharmacology
Current clinical pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Current Clinical Pharmacology publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in clinical pharmacology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: pharmacokinetics; therapeutic trials; adverse drug reactions; drug interactions; drug metabolism; pharmacoepidemiology; and drug development. The journal is essential reading for all researchers in clinical pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Efficacy of Withania somnifera Root Extract in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo- Controlled Trial. Meet Our Editorial Board Member Comparative effectiveness of Agmatine and Choline treatment in rats with cognitive impairment induced by AlCl3 and Forced Swim Stress. Meet Our Associate Editorial Board Member Meet Our Editorial Board Member
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1