Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict.

IF 9.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Current climate change reports Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-10-27 DOI:10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9
Elisabeth A Gilmore, Lauren Herzer Risi, Elizabeth Tennant, Halvard Buhaug
{"title":"Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict.","authors":"Elisabeth A Gilmore,&nbsp;Lauren Herzer Risi,&nbsp;Elizabeth Tennant,&nbsp;Halvard Buhaug","doi":"10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This special issue on \"Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict\" brings together the results of a 2018 workshop organized by the Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) and the Wilson Center with six papers that address different aspects of the translation of the research on climate change and conflict to policy and practice. Here, we provide an overview of the workshop and papers to highlight key opportunities and challenges to linking the climate-conflict scholarship with pressing issues in diplomacy, development, and security.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Multiple methods, especially comparative case studies, should be applied to elucidate the more complex mechanisms of the climate-conflict link. This approach may also enhance engagement with the policymakers who draw on examples and narratives. There is also a need for both predictive models that capture contextual factors and policy interactions as well as decision-support tools, such as integrated assessment models, that can be used to test the implications of different theories and models in the literature.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Scholars should engage the policy community to formulate research questions that are more policy relevant, such as the effectiveness of interventions. There is also the need for models and frameworks that help practitioners synthesize the academic results. Practitioners are encouraged to leverage the comparative advantages of academic researchers in new policy and projects to inform data collection and future analysis of effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54235,"journal":{"name":"Current climate change reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"313-319"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current climate change reports","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose of review: This special issue on "Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict" brings together the results of a 2018 workshop organized by the Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) and the Wilson Center with six papers that address different aspects of the translation of the research on climate change and conflict to policy and practice. Here, we provide an overview of the workshop and papers to highlight key opportunities and challenges to linking the climate-conflict scholarship with pressing issues in diplomacy, development, and security.

Recent findings: Multiple methods, especially comparative case studies, should be applied to elucidate the more complex mechanisms of the climate-conflict link. This approach may also enhance engagement with the policymakers who draw on examples and narratives. There is also a need for both predictive models that capture contextual factors and policy interactions as well as decision-support tools, such as integrated assessment models, that can be used to test the implications of different theories and models in the literature.

Summary: Scholars should engage the policy community to formulate research questions that are more policy relevant, such as the effectiveness of interventions. There is also the need for models and frameworks that help practitioners synthesize the academic results. Practitioners are encouraged to leverage the comparative advantages of academic researchers in new policy and projects to inform data collection and future analysis of effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衔接气候变化与冲突的研究与政策。
审查目的:本期关于“弥合气候变化和冲突的研究与政策”的特刊汇集了奥斯陆和平研究所(PRIO)和威尔逊中心组织的2018年研讨会的成果,以及六篇论文,这些论文涉及将气候变化和冲突研究转化为政策和实践的不同方面。在这里,我们提供了研讨会和论文的概述,以突出将气候冲突学术与外交、发展和安全等紧迫问题联系起来的关键机遇和挑战。最近的发现:应该采用多种方法,特别是比较案例研究,来阐明气候冲突联系的更复杂的机制。这种方法还可以加强与利用实例和叙述的政策制定者的接触。此外,还需要能够捕捉环境因素和政策相互作用的预测模型,以及决策支持工具,如可用于测试文献中不同理论和模型的含义的综合评估模型。摘要:学者们应该让政策界参与制定与政策更相关的研究问题,比如干预措施的有效性。还需要模型和框架来帮助实践者综合学术成果。鼓励从业人员在新政策和项目中利用学术研究人员的比较优势,为数据收集和未来的有效性分析提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current climate change reports
Current climate change reports Environmental Science-Global and Planetary Change
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Current Climate Change Reports is dedicated to exploring the most recent research and policy issues in the dynamically evolving field of Climate Change. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics, encompassing Ecological Impacts, Advances in Modeling, Sea Level Projections, Extreme Events, Climate Feedback and Sensitivity, Hydrologic Impact, Effects on Human Health, and Economics and Policy Issues. Expert contributors provide reviews on the latest research, assess the effectiveness of available options, and engage in discussions about special considerations. All articles undergo a thorough peer-review process by specialists in the field to ensure accuracy and objectivity.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Our Understanding of Eddy-driven Jet Stream Responses to Climate Change – A Roadmap Climate Change and Hydrological Extremes More Climate Finance from More Countries? The Multi-Scalar Inequities of Climate Adaptation Finance: A Critical Review Equity and Justice in Loss and Damage Finance: A Narrative Review of Catalysts and Obstacles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1