{"title":"Correlation between Aortic Calcification Score and Biochemical Parameters in Hemodialysis Patients.","authors":"Noriaki Maruyama, Terumi Higuchi, Michiko Ono, Hidetaka Oguma, Yoshihiro Nakamura, Kei Utsunomiya, Yurie Akiya, Tomomi Horikami, Toshio Yamazaki, Erina Okawa, Hideyuki Ando, Masanori Abe","doi":"10.1159/000496717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between aortic calcification and demographic and biochemical parameters in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Calcification scores of the aortic arch and abdominal aorta were determined from multi-slice computed tomography scans and evaluated according to the Agatston score. The associations between demographic and biochemical parameters and aortic calcification score were determined. In total, 190 patients were included in the study. There was a significant positive correlation between aortic calcification scores and age, duration of hemodialysis, cardiothoracic ratio, normalized protein catabolic rate, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), serum markers of mineral metabolism, and inflammation. A significant negative correlation was found between aortic calcification scores and platelet count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, duration of hemodialysis, baPWV, phosphate, calcium and phosphate (Ca×P) product, parathyroid hormone, and C-reactive protein levels were independent risk factors for calcification of the aortic arch, while baPWV and Ca×P product were independent risk factors for calcification of the abdominal aorta. Key Messages: Aortic calcification scores correlate with age, duration of hemodialysis, and several biochemical parameters of inflammation and mineral metabolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":10725,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000496717","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000496717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between aortic calcification and demographic and biochemical parameters in hemodialysis patients.
Summary: Calcification scores of the aortic arch and abdominal aorta were determined from multi-slice computed tomography scans and evaluated according to the Agatston score. The associations between demographic and biochemical parameters and aortic calcification score were determined. In total, 190 patients were included in the study. There was a significant positive correlation between aortic calcification scores and age, duration of hemodialysis, cardiothoracic ratio, normalized protein catabolic rate, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), serum markers of mineral metabolism, and inflammation. A significant negative correlation was found between aortic calcification scores and platelet count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, duration of hemodialysis, baPWV, phosphate, calcium and phosphate (Ca×P) product, parathyroid hormone, and C-reactive protein levels were independent risk factors for calcification of the aortic arch, while baPWV and Ca×P product were independent risk factors for calcification of the abdominal aorta. Key Messages: Aortic calcification scores correlate with age, duration of hemodialysis, and several biochemical parameters of inflammation and mineral metabolism.
期刊介绍:
The speed of developments in nephrology has been fueled by the promise that new findings may improve the care of patients suffering from renal disease. Participating in these rapid advances, this series has released an exceptional number of volumes that explore problems of immediate importance for clinical nephrology. Focus ranges from discussion of innovative treatment strategies to critical evaluations of investigative methodology. The value of regularly consolidating the newest findings and theories is enhanced through the inclusion of extensive bibliographies which make each volume a reference work deserving careful study.