Challenges of Using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM Codes for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma in Databases for Health Services Research.

Lisa M Hess, Yajun E Zhu, Tomoko Sugihara, Yun Fang, Nicholas Collins, Steven Nicol
{"title":"Challenges of Using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM Codes for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma in Databases for Health Services Research.","authors":"Lisa M Hess,&nbsp;Yajun E Zhu,&nbsp;Tomoko Sugihara,&nbsp;Yun Fang,&nbsp;Nicholas Collins,&nbsp;Steven Nicol","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is a heterogeneous group of rare solid tumors that arise from various soft tissues in the body, such as muscle, fat, nerves, and blood vessels. Current International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding systems include a set of nonspecific codes for malignancies of connective and soft tissue (ICD-9-CM code 171 and ICD-10-CM code C49). The goal of this study was to evaluate the use of these codes for health services research involving patients with a diagnosis of this rare malignancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two databases were utilized to explore ICD coding for STS: claims data from Truven MarketScan and electronic medical records (EMRs) from Flatiron Health. Eligible patients from claims data were those with at least two ICD-9-CM codes of 171.x on two different days between July 1, 2004, and March 30, 2014. The treatment patterns of these cases were evaluated for consistency with known therapeutic approaches for STS. Eligible patients from the Flatiron EMR system were those who received olaratumab (a drug indicated only for use in patients diagnosed with STS) after its US Food and Drug Administration approval in October 2016 through the end of the data set (November 2017). ICD-10-CM codes were evaluated for this known STS cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In claims data, 4,159 patients were eligible for inclusion. Although national treatment guidelines include only a limited number of drugs used to treat STS, 98 unique anticancer drugs were identified as being used to treat patients in a claims data cohort. Only 7.7 percent of patients had claims for doxorubicin-based therapy and 3.8 percent had claims for ifosfamide-based therapy as initial treatment for STS, despite these being a standard of care. In the EMR data, 350 patients were eligible; only 170 patients (48.6 percent) had any evidence in the database of a connective or soft-tissue ICD-10-CM malignancy code within 60 days before or after initiation of olaratumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICD coding for STS using the \"Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue\" code is not reliable as a method to identify patients diagnosed with STS. Although codes reflecting the primary site of disease may have clinical relevance, lack of consistency in ICD coding for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease is a limiting factor in the ability to conduct real-world observational research of this rare disease. In the absence of consistent use of this code, an algorithm needs to be developed and validated to accurately identify patients with STS in these databases.</p>","PeriodicalId":40052,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6462881/pdf/phim0016-0001c.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is a heterogeneous group of rare solid tumors that arise from various soft tissues in the body, such as muscle, fat, nerves, and blood vessels. Current International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding systems include a set of nonspecific codes for malignancies of connective and soft tissue (ICD-9-CM code 171 and ICD-10-CM code C49). The goal of this study was to evaluate the use of these codes for health services research involving patients with a diagnosis of this rare malignancy.

Methods: Two databases were utilized to explore ICD coding for STS: claims data from Truven MarketScan and electronic medical records (EMRs) from Flatiron Health. Eligible patients from claims data were those with at least two ICD-9-CM codes of 171.x on two different days between July 1, 2004, and March 30, 2014. The treatment patterns of these cases were evaluated for consistency with known therapeutic approaches for STS. Eligible patients from the Flatiron EMR system were those who received olaratumab (a drug indicated only for use in patients diagnosed with STS) after its US Food and Drug Administration approval in October 2016 through the end of the data set (November 2017). ICD-10-CM codes were evaluated for this known STS cohort.

Results: In claims data, 4,159 patients were eligible for inclusion. Although national treatment guidelines include only a limited number of drugs used to treat STS, 98 unique anticancer drugs were identified as being used to treat patients in a claims data cohort. Only 7.7 percent of patients had claims for doxorubicin-based therapy and 3.8 percent had claims for ifosfamide-based therapy as initial treatment for STS, despite these being a standard of care. In the EMR data, 350 patients were eligible; only 170 patients (48.6 percent) had any evidence in the database of a connective or soft-tissue ICD-10-CM malignancy code within 60 days before or after initiation of olaratumab.

Conclusions: ICD coding for STS using the "Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue" code is not reliable as a method to identify patients diagnosed with STS. Although codes reflecting the primary site of disease may have clinical relevance, lack of consistency in ICD coding for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease is a limiting factor in the ability to conduct real-world observational research of this rare disease. In the absence of consistent use of this code, an algorithm needs to be developed and validated to accurately identify patients with STS in these databases.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卫生服务研究数据库中使用ICD-9-CM和ICD-10-CM软组织肉瘤编码的挑战。
目的:软组织肉瘤(soft -tissue sarcoma, STS)是一种异质性的罕见实体瘤,起源于人体的各种软组织,如肌肉、脂肪、神经和血管。目前的国际疾病分类(ICD)编码系统包括一组结缔组织和软组织恶性肿瘤的非特异性编码(ICD-9- cm代码171和ICD-10- cm代码C49)。本研究的目的是评估这些代码在涉及诊断为这种罕见恶性肿瘤的患者的卫生服务研究中的使用情况。方法:利用两个数据库对STS进行ICD编码:Truven MarketScan的索赔数据和Flatiron Health的电子病历(EMRs)。理赔数据中符合条件的患者为至少两个ICD-9-CM代码为171的患者。x在2004年7月1日和2014年3月30日的两个不同的日子。评估这些病例的治疗模式是否与已知的STS治疗方法一致。Flatiron EMR系统的合格患者是那些在2016年10月美国食品和药物管理局批准后接受olaratumab(一种仅用于诊断为STS的患者的药物)的患者(2017年11月)。对这一已知STS队列进行ICD-10-CM编码评估。结果:在索赔数据中,4159例患者符合纳入条件。尽管国家治疗指南只包括有限数量的用于治疗STS的药物,但在一项索赔数据队列中,98种独特的抗癌药物被确定用于治疗患者。只有7.7%的患者要求以阿霉素为基础的治疗,3.8%的患者要求以异环磷酰胺为基础的治疗作为STS的初始治疗,尽管这些是标准治疗。在EMR数据中,有350名患者符合条件;只有170名患者(48.6%)在开始使用奥拉拉单抗之前或之后的60天内在数据库中有结缔组织或软组织ICD-10-CM恶性肿瘤代码的证据。结论:使用“恶性肿瘤结缔组织和软组织”编码的ICD编码STS作为鉴别STS患者的方法不可靠。尽管反映疾病原发部位的编码可能具有临床相关性,但ICD对该病的诊断和治疗编码缺乏一致性是限制对这种罕见疾病进行实际观察性研究的一个因素。在没有一致使用该代码的情况下,需要开发和验证一种算法,以便在这些数据库中准确识别STS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Health Information Management is a scholarly, peer-reviewed research journal whose mission is to advance health information management practice and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between HIM professionals and others in disciplines supporting the advancement of the management of health information. The primary focus is to promote the linkage of practice, education, and research and to provide contributions to the understanding or improvement of health information management processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Preventing Stroke in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Best Practices for the Design of COVID-19 Dashboards. Medical Scribes: Symptom or Cause of Impeded Evolution of a Transformative Artificial Intelligence in the Electronic Health Record? Risk of Duplicate ICD Codes for Orthopedic and Injury Related Research. Quality Assessment of the Road Traffic Health and Safety Apps with a Focus on the Five Rights of Information Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1