Risk of Duplicate ICD Codes for Orthopedic and Injury Related Research.

Gregory Benes
{"title":"Risk of Duplicate ICD Codes for Orthopedic and Injury Related Research.","authors":"Gregory Benes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD) has become the international standard diagnostic classification for reporting morbidity and mortality. In 2015, the United States transitioned from the 9th to 10th Revision. The update was necessary due to major structural limitations of the ICD-9 system. Concerns of the transition mainly centered around clinical usage and cost; however, there were concerns for overlapping codes with the same classification but different meanings between the two versions. Duplicate codes could pose an issue for big data retrospective studies that overlap between the two systems. Therefore, the goals of this study are to further explore and identify duplicate ICD codes between the systems. ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM code files were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. There were 14,567 ICD-9-CM codes and 91,737 unique ICD-10-CM codes tabulated. Duplicated items between the files were isolated. Four hundred sixty-nine duplicate codes were identified, consisting of 39 E Codes and 430 V Codes. These twin codes contain classifications for external causes of injury and factors influencing health status and contact with health services. Therefore, special attention should be drawn to retrospective research involving methods of injury spanning ICD-9 and ICD-10 systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":40052,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860468/pdf/phim0020-0001e.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD) has become the international standard diagnostic classification for reporting morbidity and mortality. In 2015, the United States transitioned from the 9th to 10th Revision. The update was necessary due to major structural limitations of the ICD-9 system. Concerns of the transition mainly centered around clinical usage and cost; however, there were concerns for overlapping codes with the same classification but different meanings between the two versions. Duplicate codes could pose an issue for big data retrospective studies that overlap between the two systems. Therefore, the goals of this study are to further explore and identify duplicate ICD codes between the systems. ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM code files were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. There were 14,567 ICD-9-CM codes and 91,737 unique ICD-10-CM codes tabulated. Duplicated items between the files were isolated. Four hundred sixty-nine duplicate codes were identified, consisting of 39 E Codes and 430 V Codes. These twin codes contain classifications for external causes of injury and factors influencing health status and contact with health services. Therefore, special attention should be drawn to retrospective research involving methods of injury spanning ICD-9 and ICD-10 systems.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨科和损伤相关研究中ICD代码重复的风险。
世界卫生组织的国际疾病分类(ICD)已成为报告发病率和死亡率的国际标准诊断分类。2015年,美国从第九次修订过渡到第十次修订。由于ICD-9系统的主要结构限制,更新是必要的。对转型的担忧主要集中在临床使用和成本上;但是,两个版本之间存在分类相同但含义不同的代码重叠问题。重复的代码可能会给两个系统之间重叠的大数据回顾性研究带来问题。因此,本研究的目标是进一步探索和识别系统之间的重复ICD代码。ICD-9-CM和ICD-10-CM代码文件从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心获得。共有14567个ICD-9-CM编码和91737个唯一的ICD-10-CM编码。文件之间的重复项被隔离。共鉴定出469个重复码,其中E码39个,V码430个。这两个代码包含对伤害的外部原因和影响健康状况和与卫生服务接触的因素的分类。因此,应特别注意涉及ICD-9和ICD-10系统损伤方法的回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Health Information Management is a scholarly, peer-reviewed research journal whose mission is to advance health information management practice and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between HIM professionals and others in disciplines supporting the advancement of the management of health information. The primary focus is to promote the linkage of practice, education, and research and to provide contributions to the understanding or improvement of health information management processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Preventing Stroke in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Best Practices for the Design of COVID-19 Dashboards. Medical Scribes: Symptom or Cause of Impeded Evolution of a Transformative Artificial Intelligence in the Electronic Health Record? Risk of Duplicate ICD Codes for Orthopedic and Injury Related Research. Quality Assessment of the Road Traffic Health and Safety Apps with a Focus on the Five Rights of Information Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1