Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Two-Year Results of the Aflibercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Study
Tien Yin Wong , Yuichiro Ogura , Won Ki Lee , Tomohiro Iida , Shih-Jen Chen , Paul Mitchell , Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung , Zhongqi Zhang , Sérgio Leal , Tatsuro Ishibashi , PLANET Investigators
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Two-Year Results of the Aflibercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Study","authors":"Tien Yin Wong , Yuichiro Ogura , Won Ki Lee , Tomohiro Iida , Shih-Jen Chen , Paul Mitchell , Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung , Zhongqi Zhang , Sérgio Leal , Tatsuro Ishibashi , PLANET Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>We sought to evaluate longer-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept </span>monotherapy<span> (IAI) vs IAI plus rescue photodynamic therapy<span> (rPDT) in patients<span> with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was a prospective multicenter, double-masked, sham-controlled randomized clinical study across 62 centers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>In this phase 3b/4 study, patients with PCV with best-corrected visual acuity of 73–24 Early Treatment </span>Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (20/40–20/320 Snellen equivalent) received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks until week 12, when they were randomized 1:1 to receive IAI or IAI plus rPDT if rescue criteria were met. Patients not requiring rescue received IAI every 8 weeks; those requiring rescue received IAI every 4 weeks plus sham/active PDT. At week 52 (the primary endpoint), IAI was noninferior to IAI plus rPDT. After week 52, treatment intervals could be extended beyond 8 weeks at the investigators' discretion. Noninferiority of IAI vs IAI plus rPDT for mean best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to week 96 was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over 96 weeks, 54 patients (17.0%) met rescue criteria. At week 96, IAI was noninferior to IAI plus rPDT in terms of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters gained (+10.7 vs +9.1, <em>P</em> = .48). Proportions of patients with complete polyp regression (33.1% vs 29.1%) or without active polyps (82.1% vs 85.6%) were similar. In year 2, the mean number of injections was 4.6 in both arms. No new safety signals were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IAI monotherapy was noninferior to IAI with rescue PDT up to 96 weeks, and functional and anatomical improvements achieved at 52 weeks were maintained. Few patients required rescue PDT, which provided no additional visual benefit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"204 ","pages":"Pages 80-89"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.027","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939419300868","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54
Abstract
Purpose
We sought to evaluate longer-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy (IAI) vs IAI plus rescue photodynamic therapy (rPDT) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).
Design
This was a prospective multicenter, double-masked, sham-controlled randomized clinical study across 62 centers.
Methods
In this phase 3b/4 study, patients with PCV with best-corrected visual acuity of 73–24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (20/40–20/320 Snellen equivalent) received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks until week 12, when they were randomized 1:1 to receive IAI or IAI plus rPDT if rescue criteria were met. Patients not requiring rescue received IAI every 8 weeks; those requiring rescue received IAI every 4 weeks plus sham/active PDT. At week 52 (the primary endpoint), IAI was noninferior to IAI plus rPDT. After week 52, treatment intervals could be extended beyond 8 weeks at the investigators' discretion. Noninferiority of IAI vs IAI plus rPDT for mean best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to week 96 was evaluated.
Results
Over 96 weeks, 54 patients (17.0%) met rescue criteria. At week 96, IAI was noninferior to IAI plus rPDT in terms of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters gained (+10.7 vs +9.1, P = .48). Proportions of patients with complete polyp regression (33.1% vs 29.1%) or without active polyps (82.1% vs 85.6%) were similar. In year 2, the mean number of injections was 4.6 in both arms. No new safety signals were observed.
Conclusion
IAI monotherapy was noninferior to IAI with rescue PDT up to 96 weeks, and functional and anatomical improvements achieved at 52 weeks were maintained. Few patients required rescue PDT, which provided no additional visual benefit.
目的:评价玻璃体内阿布西贝单药治疗(IAI)与IAI联合救援光动力治疗(rPDT)治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变(PCV)患者的长期疗效和安全性。设计:这是一项涉及62个中心的前瞻性多中心、双盲、假对照随机临床研究。方法在这项3b/4期研究中,最佳矫正视力为73-24的早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究字母(20/40-20/320 Snellen当量)的PCV患者每4周接受2 mg IAI,直到第12周,当他们按1:1随机分配接受IAI或IAI加rPDT治疗,如果符合拯救标准。不需要抢救的患者每8周接受IAI治疗;需要救援的患者每4周接受IAI治疗,并接受假/主动PDT治疗。在第52周(主要终点),IAI的疗效不逊于IAI + rPDT。第52周后,根据研究者的判断,治疗间隔可延长至8周以上。评估IAI与IAI加rPDT对从基线到第96周的平均最佳矫正视力变化的非劣效性。结果96周内,54例(17.0%)患者符合抢救标准。在第96周,在早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变方面,IAI不逊色于IAI + rPDT (+10.7 vs +9.1, P = 0.48)。息肉完全消退(33.1% vs 29.1%)或无活动性息肉(82.1% vs 85.6%)的患者比例相似。第2年,双臂平均注射次数为4.6次。没有观察到新的安全信号。结论IAI单药治疗在96周内的疗效不低于IAI联合挽救性PDT,在52周时功能和解剖改善得以维持。很少有患者需要救助性PDT,这没有提供额外的视觉益处。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.