Privacy Policy and Technology in Biomedical Data Science.

IF 7 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013416
April Moreno Arellano, Wenrui Dai, Shuang Wang, Xiaoqian Jiang, Lucila Ohno-Machado
{"title":"Privacy Policy and Technology in Biomedical Data Science.","authors":"April Moreno Arellano, Wenrui Dai, Shuang Wang, Xiaoqian Jiang, Lucila Ohno-Machado","doi":"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Privacyis an important consideration when sharing clinical data, which often contain sensitive information. Adequate protection to safeguard patient privacy and to increase public trust in biomedical research is paramount. This review covers topics in policy and technology in the context of clinical data sharing. We review policy articles related to (<i>a</i>) the Common Rule, HIPAA privacy and security rules, and governance; (<i>b</i>) patients' viewpoints and consent practices; and (<i>c</i>) research ethics. We identify key features of the revised Common Rule and the most notable changes since its previous version. We address data governance for research in addition to the increasing emphasis on ethical and social implications. Research ethics topics include data sharing best practices, use of data from populations of low socioeconomic status (SES), recent updates to institutional review board (IRB) processes to protect human subjects' data, and important concerns about the limitations of current policies to address data deidentification. In terms of technology, we focus on articles that have applicability in real world health care applications: deidentification methods that comply with HIPAA, data anonymization approaches to satisfy well-acknowledged issues in deidentified data, encryption methods to safeguard data analyses, and privacy-preserving predictive modeling. The first two technology topics are mostly relevant to methodologies that attempt to sanitize structured or unstructured data. The third topic includes analysis on encrypted data. The last topic includes various mechanisms to build statistical models without sharing raw data.</p>","PeriodicalId":29775,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","volume":"1 ","pages":"115-129"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6497413/pdf/nihms-1021989.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Privacyis an important consideration when sharing clinical data, which often contain sensitive information. Adequate protection to safeguard patient privacy and to increase public trust in biomedical research is paramount. This review covers topics in policy and technology in the context of clinical data sharing. We review policy articles related to (a) the Common Rule, HIPAA privacy and security rules, and governance; (b) patients' viewpoints and consent practices; and (c) research ethics. We identify key features of the revised Common Rule and the most notable changes since its previous version. We address data governance for research in addition to the increasing emphasis on ethical and social implications. Research ethics topics include data sharing best practices, use of data from populations of low socioeconomic status (SES), recent updates to institutional review board (IRB) processes to protect human subjects' data, and important concerns about the limitations of current policies to address data deidentification. In terms of technology, we focus on articles that have applicability in real world health care applications: deidentification methods that comply with HIPAA, data anonymization approaches to satisfy well-acknowledged issues in deidentified data, encryption methods to safeguard data analyses, and privacy-preserving predictive modeling. The first two technology topics are mostly relevant to methodologies that attempt to sanitize structured or unstructured data. The third topic includes analysis on encrypted data. The last topic includes various mechanisms to build statistical models without sharing raw data.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物医学数据科学中的隐私政策与技术。
隐私是共享临床数据时的一个重要考虑因素,这些数据通常包含敏感信息。充分保护患者隐私和增加公众对生物医学研究的信任至关重要。这篇综述涵盖了临床数据共享背景下的政策和技术主题。我们审查了与(a)通用规则、HIPAA隐私和安全规则以及治理相关的政策文章;(b) 患者的观点和同意做法;以及(c)研究伦理。我们确定了修订后的共同规则的主要特点以及自上一版本以来最显著的变化。除了越来越重视伦理和社会影响外,我们还致力于研究数据治理。研究伦理主题包括数据共享最佳实践、低社会经济地位人群(SES)数据的使用、机构审查委员会(IRB)保护人类受试者数据程序的最新更新,以及对当前解决数据去识别问题的政策局限性的重要关注。在技术方面,我们专注于在现实世界的医疗保健应用中具有适用性的文章:符合HIPAA的去识别方法,满足去识别数据中公认问题的数据匿名方法,保护数据分析的加密方法,以及保护隐私的预测建模。前两个技术主题主要与试图净化结构化或非结构化数据的方法论有关。第三个主题包括对加密数据的分析。最后一个主题包括在不共享原始数据的情况下构建统计模型的各种机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science provides comprehensive expert reviews in biomedical data science, focusing on advanced methods to store, retrieve, analyze, and organize biomedical data and knowledge. The scope of the journal encompasses informatics, computational, artificial intelligence (AI), and statistical approaches to biomedical data, including the sub-fields of bioinformatics, computational biology, biomedical informatics, clinical and clinical research informatics, biostatistics, and imaging informatics. The mission of the journal is to identify both emerging and established areas of biomedical data science, and the leaders in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Transcriptomics Brings New Challenges and Opportunities for Trajectory Inference. The Evolutionary Interplay of Somatic and Germline Mutation Rates. Centralized and Federated Models for the Analysis of Clinical Data. Mapping the Human Cell Surface Interactome: A Key to Decode Cell-to-Cell Communication. Data Science Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation in Real-World Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1