Frequency Values and Their Relationship With the Diameter of Dental Implants. Prospective Study of 559 Implants.

3区医学 Q1 Dentistry Implant Dentistry Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000887

Juan Manuel Aragoneses, Ana Suárez, Vanessa Arlette Brugal, Margarita Gómez

{"title":"Frequency Values and Their Relationship With the Diameter of Dental Implants. Prospective Study of 559 Implants.","authors":"Juan Manuel Aragoneses, Ana Suárez, Vanessa Arlette Brugal, Margarita Gómez","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the relationship between implant diameter, and primary and secondary stability.Materials and methods: Five hundred fifty-nine implants with diameters of 3.7, 4.0, and 4.3 mm and lengths of 10 and 11.5 mm were placed in 195 patients. The resonance frequency was measured during surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Related average implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 69.62 for 3.7-mm implants, 72.02 for 4.0-mm implants, and 69.67 for 4.3-mm implants. Values in men were greater than values in women. Values were greater for the mandible than for the maxilla. There are significant differences between 4.0-mm implants, and 3.7 anterior maxilla and 4.3 posterior maxilla.Conclusions: There is no relationship between increased ISQ values and increased diameters. We observed a preference regarding sex, with men having significantly greater values for 3.7- and 4.3-mm diameters. The mandible obtained the greatest ISQ values, with significant differences for diameters 3.7 and 4.3 mm.","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000887","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the relationship between implant diameter, and primary and secondary stability.

Materials and methods: Five hundred fifty-nine implants with diameters of 3.7, 4.0, and 4.3 mm and lengths of 10 and 11.5 mm were placed in 195 patients. The resonance frequency was measured during surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results: Related average implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 69.62 for 3.7-mm implants, 72.02 for 4.0-mm implants, and 69.67 for 4.3-mm implants. Values in men were greater than values in women. Values were greater for the mandible than for the maxilla. There are significant differences between 4.0-mm implants, and 3.7 anterior maxilla and 4.3 posterior maxilla.

Conclusions: There is no relationship between increased ISQ values and increased diameters. We observed a preference regarding sex, with men having significantly greater values for 3.7- and 4.3-mm diameters. The mandible obtained the greatest ISQ values, with significant differences for diameters 3.7 and 4.3 mm.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

频率值及其与种植体直径的关系。559个种植体的前瞻性研究。

目的:本前瞻性研究的目的是评估种植体直径与初级和次级稳定性之间的关系。材料与方法:共植入559个种植体，直径分别为3.7、4.0和4.3 mm，长度分别为10和11.5 mm，共195例患者。在手术期间和3、6、12个月时测量共振频率。结果:3.7 mm种植体ISQ平均值为69.62,4.0 mm种植体ISQ平均值为72.02,4.3 mm种植体ISQ平均值为69.67。男性的价值观高于女性的价值观。下颌骨的数值大于上颌骨。4.0 mm种植体与3.7前颌和4.3后颌差异显著。结论:ISQ值的增加与直径的增加没有关系。我们观察到对性别的偏好，男性对3.7毫米和4.3毫米直径的值明显更高。下颌骨的ISQ值最大，直径为3.7 mm和4.3 mm时差异显著。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.