The Effect of Implementation of the Standard Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Management of Multiple Trauma Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department.

Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2017-12-11 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.37
Farhad Heydari, Mohammad-Hosein Maghami, Mehrdad Esmailian, Majid Zamani
{"title":"The Effect of Implementation of the Standard Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Management of Multiple Trauma Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department.","authors":"Farhad Heydari,&nbsp;Mohammad-Hosein Maghami,&nbsp;Mehrdad Esmailian,&nbsp;Majid Zamani","doi":"10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of triage in the standard Clinical Practice Guide (CPG) for multiple trauma patients is to perform the primary and secondary evaluations in the quickest and shortest possible time with minimal errors and the best quality in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, a practical program for a coordinated management of multiple trauma patients in the ED has been provided by using the CPG guide. The impact of its implementation on the multiple trauma patients' management was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study conducted in 2014 and 2015 in Isfahan's Al-Zahra hospital ED. Administration and management of multiple trauma patients had been prepared before the implementation of the plan based on standard clinical methods of implementation in a way that used a 12-step protocol for the practical guide. This protocol was designed as a flowchart and the results before and after its implementation were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 100 multiple trauma patients before and after the implementation of the protocol were studied. The mean age of the patients and other baseline characteristics of studied patients in the two periods before and after implantation of the CPG were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The frequency of intubation (p = 0.016) and sent to the operating room (p < 0.001) were different in the two study periods. However, hospitalization in the ICU (p = 0.35) and death (p = 0.73) before and after implementation of the protocol were not statistically different. The time before examination by the EM physicians was significantly lower in all triage levels after CPG implementation. Meanwhile, no change in time elapsed occurred for the surgeons except for the patients in level 2 of triage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of the strategic plan of CPG lead to a significant reduction in waiting time for visits by emergency medicine services and other specialized services, increased the deployment of patients needing surgery, and reducing the time spent in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":7290,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/1c/AJEM-2-e5.PMC6548104.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of triage in the standard Clinical Practice Guide (CPG) for multiple trauma patients is to perform the primary and secondary evaluations in the quickest and shortest possible time with minimal errors and the best quality in the emergency department (ED).

Objective: In this study, a practical program for a coordinated management of multiple trauma patients in the ED has been provided by using the CPG guide. The impact of its implementation on the multiple trauma patients' management was evaluated.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in 2014 and 2015 in Isfahan's Al-Zahra hospital ED. Administration and management of multiple trauma patients had been prepared before the implementation of the plan based on standard clinical methods of implementation in a way that used a 12-step protocol for the practical guide. This protocol was designed as a flowchart and the results before and after its implementation were evaluated.

Results: In this study, 100 multiple trauma patients before and after the implementation of the protocol were studied. The mean age of the patients and other baseline characteristics of studied patients in the two periods before and after implantation of the CPG were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The frequency of intubation (p = 0.016) and sent to the operating room (p < 0.001) were different in the two study periods. However, hospitalization in the ICU (p = 0.35) and death (p = 0.73) before and after implementation of the protocol were not statistically different. The time before examination by the EM physicians was significantly lower in all triage levels after CPG implementation. Meanwhile, no change in time elapsed occurred for the surgeons except for the patients in level 2 of triage.

Conclusion: Implementation of the strategic plan of CPG lead to a significant reduction in waiting time for visits by emergency medicine services and other specialized services, increased the deployment of patients needing surgery, and reducing the time spent in the ED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科多发性创伤患者管理标准临床实践指南(CPG)的实施效果。
引言:标准临床实践指南(CPG)对多发性创伤患者进行分诊的目的是在急诊科(ED)以最快、最短的时间、最小的错误和最好的质量进行一级和二级评估。目的:在本研究中,通过使用CPG指南,为ED中多发创伤患者的协调管理提供了一个实用的程序。评估其实施对多发性创伤患者管理的影响。方法:这是2014年和2015年在伊斯法罕Al Zahra医院ED进行的一项横断面研究。在实施该计划之前,根据标准临床实施方法,以12步方案作为实践指南,对多发性创伤患者进行了管理和管理。该协议被设计为流程图,并对实施前后的结果进行了评估。结果:本研究对100例多发性创伤患者实施方案前后进行了研究。CPG植入前后两个时期的患者平均年龄和其他基线特征没有显著差异(p>0.05)。两个研究时期的插管频率(p=0.016)和送往手术室的频率(p<0.001)不同。然而,在方案实施前后,ICU住院(p=0.35)和死亡(p=0.73)没有统计学差异。在CPG实施后的所有分诊级别中,EM医生检查前的时间明显较低。同时,除了2级分诊的患者外,外科医生的时间没有变化。结论:CPG战略计划的实施显著减少了急诊医疗服务和其他专业服务的就诊等待时间,增加了需要手术的患者的部署,并减少了在急诊室的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Ramadan on Emergency Department Patients Flow; a Cross-Sectional Study in UAE. Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 7: How to Calculate the Sample Size Based on a Correlation. Generalist versus Abdominal Subspecialist Radiologist Interpretations of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Performed on Patients with Abdominal Pain and its Impact on the Therapeutic Approach. Development and Implementation of Integrated Road Traffic Injuries Surveillance - India (IRIS-India): A Protocol. A Letter on "The Current Status of Genes and Genetic Testing in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1