Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2019-06-05 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-0891-7021
Antina Schulze, Stefan Kwast, Martin Busse
{"title":"Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby.","authors":"Antina Schulze,&nbsp;Stefan Kwast,&nbsp;Martin Busse","doi":"10.1055/a-0891-7021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mouthguards (MGs) are highly recommended in rugby. Airway obstruction and a resulting decrease in power output are potential disadvantages of their usage. The aim of the study was to assess possible limitations of \"vented\" (MG <sub>V</sub> ) and custom-made mouthguards (MG <sub>C</sub> ) on rugby players' performance. The MG effects were investigated in 13 male first-league rugby players ranging from 18-34 years old. First a lung function test was completed. Then a double incremental treadmill test was performed to measure maximum aerobic performance, ventilation, VO <sub>2</sub> , VCO <sub>2</sub> , heart rate, and lactate. Effects on sprint times (10 and 40 m) and countermovement jumps were also investigated. Peak flow values were significantly decreased with MG <sub>V</sub> by about 0.9 l/s. Neither ventilatory parameters nor oxygen uptake were affected by either of the mouthguards. Maximum lactate was significantly decreased in both MG types vs. no MG use. The maximum running velocity was similar in all tests. The aerobic energy turnover was moderately increased with the MG <sub>C</sub> and MG <sub>V</sub> . No effects were seen on sprint times or jump tests. Although neither type of mouthguard had a significant impact on maximum performance in treadmill running, the anaerobic energy turnover was decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"3 1","pages":"E25-E31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-0891-7021","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0891-7021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Mouthguards (MGs) are highly recommended in rugby. Airway obstruction and a resulting decrease in power output are potential disadvantages of their usage. The aim of the study was to assess possible limitations of "vented" (MG V ) and custom-made mouthguards (MG C ) on rugby players' performance. The MG effects were investigated in 13 male first-league rugby players ranging from 18-34 years old. First a lung function test was completed. Then a double incremental treadmill test was performed to measure maximum aerobic performance, ventilation, VO 2 , VCO 2 , heart rate, and lactate. Effects on sprint times (10 and 40 m) and countermovement jumps were also investigated. Peak flow values were significantly decreased with MG V by about 0.9 l/s. Neither ventilatory parameters nor oxygen uptake were affected by either of the mouthguards. Maximum lactate was significantly decreased in both MG types vs. no MG use. The maximum running velocity was similar in all tests. The aerobic energy turnover was moderately increased with the MG C and MG V . No effects were seen on sprint times or jump tests. Although neither type of mouthguard had a significant impact on maximum performance in treadmill running, the anaerobic energy turnover was decreased.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护齿器对橄榄球运动员生理反应的影响。
在橄榄球比赛中,强烈建议使用护齿器。气道阻塞和由此导致的功率输出减少是其使用的潜在缺点。本研究的目的是评估“通气式”护齿器(MG V)和定制护齿器(MG C)对橄榄球运动员表现的可能限制。对13名18-34岁的橄榄球甲级联赛男性运动员进行了MG效应研究。首先完成了肺功能检查。然后进行双增量跑步机试验,测量最大有氧运动性能、通气、VO 2、VCO 2、心率和乳酸。研究了对10米和40米冲刺时间和反动作跳跃的影响。峰值流量随MG V显著降低约0.9 l/s。两种护齿器均不影响通气参数和摄氧量。与未使用MG相比,两种MG类型的最大乳酸显著降低。在所有测试中,最大运行速度是相似的。好氧能量周转随MG C和MG V的增加而适度增加。在短跑时间或跳跃测试中没有看到任何影响。尽管这两种护齿器对跑步机上的最佳表现都没有显著影响,但厌氧能量周转减少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Win Your Race Goal: A Generalized Approach to Prediction of Running Performance. Effect of Lower Limb Muscle Fatigue on Dynamic Balance Performance in Healthy Young Adults: Role of Arm Movement. Effects of Exercise-Induced Changes in Myokine Expression on the Tumor Microenvironment. One year of heavy resistance training modifies muscle fiber characteristics in elderly Comparison of Neuromuscular Fatigue in Powerlifting Paralympics in Different Training Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1