How Initial Word Reading and Language Skills Affect Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Students With Reading Difficulties.

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptional Children Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-10-08 DOI:10.1177/0014402918782618
Sharon Vaughn, Greg Roberts, Philip Capin, Jeremy Miciak, Eunsoo Cho, Jack M Fletcher
{"title":"How Initial Word Reading and Language Skills Affect Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Students With Reading Difficulties.","authors":"Sharon Vaughn,&nbsp;Greg Roberts,&nbsp;Philip Capin,&nbsp;Jeremy Miciak,&nbsp;Eunsoo Cho,&nbsp;Jack M Fletcher","doi":"10.1177/0014402918782618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined how differences in listening comprehension and word reading at the beginning of the school year influence changes in reading comprehension for English learners (ELs) with significant reading difficulties compared to non-ELs with significant reading difficulties. The study investigated heterogeneity in response to instruction among 400 struggling readers in fourth grade (<i>n</i> = 183 for non-EL; <i>n</i> = 217 for EL) who received an intensive reading intervention. At pretest, word reading, listening comprehension, and reading comprehension were measured, and at posttest, reading comprehension was measured again. Results from moderated multiple regression analyses showed a significant three-way interaction such that reading comprehension at posttest was higher for ELs than non-ELs with similar levels of low word reading but relatively higher levels of listening comprehension. However, non-ELs outperformed ELs with similar levels of relatively high word reading and average to high listening comprehension. The findings suggest that pre-intervention skill profiles may need to be interpreted differently for ELs and non-ELs with significant reading difficulties in relation to language and literacy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"85 2","pages":"180-196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0014402918782618","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918782618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This study examined how differences in listening comprehension and word reading at the beginning of the school year influence changes in reading comprehension for English learners (ELs) with significant reading difficulties compared to non-ELs with significant reading difficulties. The study investigated heterogeneity in response to instruction among 400 struggling readers in fourth grade (n = 183 for non-EL; n = 217 for EL) who received an intensive reading intervention. At pretest, word reading, listening comprehension, and reading comprehension were measured, and at posttest, reading comprehension was measured again. Results from moderated multiple regression analyses showed a significant three-way interaction such that reading comprehension at posttest was higher for ELs than non-ELs with similar levels of low word reading but relatively higher levels of listening comprehension. However, non-ELs outperformed ELs with similar levels of relatively high word reading and average to high listening comprehension. The findings suggest that pre-intervention skill profiles may need to be interpreted differently for ELs and non-ELs with significant reading difficulties in relation to language and literacy outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初始单词阅读和语言技能如何影响阅读困难学生的阅读理解结果。
本研究考察了与有显著阅读困难的非英语学习者相比,有显著阅读障碍的英语学习者在学年初听力理解和单词阅读的差异如何影响阅读理解的变化。该研究调查了接受强化阅读干预的400名四年级困难读者(非EL组n=183;EL组n=217)对教学反应的异质性。在前测中,测量单词阅读、听力和阅读理解,在后测中,再次测量阅读理解。适度多元回归分析的结果显示,存在显著的三元交互作用,即英语学习者在后测中的阅读理解高于低单词阅读水平相似但听力理解水平相对较高的非英语学习者。然而,非英语学习者的表现优于英语学习者,他们的单词阅读水平相对较高,听力理解水平从中等到较高。研究结果表明,对于在语言和识字结果方面存在严重阅读困难的ELs和非ELs,可能需要对干预前的技能档案进行不同的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
期刊最新文献
Examining STEM Preferences in Autistic Students: The Role of Contextual Support, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations An Open Letter to the Field: Contemplating Special Education's Collaborative Role in Developing Inclusive Education A Descriptive Portrait of the Paraeducator Workforce in Washington State Ethnoracial Diversity of the Special Educator Workforce Over Time Deeping the Commitment to Our Editorial Vision and Recognizing Areas for Comprehensive Reform in Special Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1