Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior

IF 5.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2019-06-28 DOI:10.1111/cobi.13381
Julie Whitburn, Wayne Linklater, Wokje Abrahamse
{"title":"Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior","authors":"Julie Whitburn,&nbsp;Wayne Linklater,&nbsp;Wokje Abrahamse","doi":"10.1111/cobi.13381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding what drives environmentally protective or destructive behavior is important to the design and implementation of effective public policies to encourage people's engagement in proenvironmental behavior (PEB). Research shows that a connection to nature is associated with greater engagement in PEB. However, the variety of instruments and methods used in these studies poses a major barrier to integrating research findings. We conducted a meta-analysis of the relationship between connection to nature and PEB. We identified studies through a systematic review of the literature and used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to analyze the results from 37 samples (<i>n</i> = 13,237) and to test for moderators. A random-effects model demonstrated a positive and significant association between connection to nature and PEB (<i>r</i> = 0.42, 95% CI 0.36, 0.47, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). People who are more connected to nature reported greater engagement in PEB. Standard tests indicated little effect of publication bias in the sample. There was significant heterogeneity among the samples. Univariate categorical analyses showed that the scales used to measure connection to nature and PEB were significant moderators and explained the majority of the between-study variance. The geographic location of a study, age of participants, and the percentage of females in a study were not significant moderators. We found that a deeper connection to nature may partially explain why some people behave more proenvironmentally than others and that the relationship is ubiquitous. Facilitating a stronger connection to nature may result in greater engagement in PEB and conservation, although more longitudinal studies with randomized experiments are required to demonstrate causation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":"34 1","pages":"180-193"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/cobi.13381","citationCount":"241","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.13381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 241

Abstract

Understanding what drives environmentally protective or destructive behavior is important to the design and implementation of effective public policies to encourage people's engagement in proenvironmental behavior (PEB). Research shows that a connection to nature is associated with greater engagement in PEB. However, the variety of instruments and methods used in these studies poses a major barrier to integrating research findings. We conducted a meta-analysis of the relationship between connection to nature and PEB. We identified studies through a systematic review of the literature and used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to analyze the results from 37 samples (n = 13,237) and to test for moderators. A random-effects model demonstrated a positive and significant association between connection to nature and PEB (r = 0.42, 95% CI 0.36, 0.47, p < 0.001). People who are more connected to nature reported greater engagement in PEB. Standard tests indicated little effect of publication bias in the sample. There was significant heterogeneity among the samples. Univariate categorical analyses showed that the scales used to measure connection to nature and PEB were significant moderators and explained the majority of the between-study variance. The geographic location of a study, age of participants, and the percentage of females in a study were not significant moderators. We found that a deeper connection to nature may partially explain why some people behave more proenvironmentally than others and that the relationship is ubiquitous. Facilitating a stronger connection to nature may result in greater engagement in PEB and conservation, although more longitudinal studies with randomized experiments are required to demonstrate causation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人与自然的联系和环保行为的元分析
了解驱动环境保护或破坏行为的因素对于设计和实施有效的公共政策以鼓励人们参与环保行为(PEB)非常重要。研究表明,与大自然的联系与更多地参与PEB有关。然而,这些研究中使用的各种仪器和方法对整合研究成果构成了主要障碍。我们对亲近自然与PEB之间的关系进行了荟萃分析。我们通过对文献的系统回顾来确定研究,并使用综合meta分析软件来分析37个样本(n = 13,237)的结果并测试调节因子。随机效应模型显示,与自然的联系与PEB之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.42, 95% CI 0.36, 0.47, p <0.001)。与大自然联系更紧密的人在PEB上的参与度更高。标准检验表明样本中发表偏倚的影响很小。样本间存在显著的异质性。单变量分类分析表明,用于测量与自然和PEB联系的量表是显著的调节因子,并解释了大部分研究间方差。研究的地理位置、参与者的年龄和女性在研究中的比例并不是显著的调节因素。我们发现,与自然更深层次的联系可能部分解释了为什么有些人比其他人更环保,这种关系无处不在。促进与自然的更强联系可能会导致更多的PEB和保护参与,尽管需要更多的纵向研究和随机实验来证明因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
期刊最新文献
A synthesis of principles for building the social-ecological resilience and adaptive capacity of protected and conserved areas. Scenarios and strategies for future-proofing ecosystem management under climatic novelty. Defining and identifying relevant stakeholders to advance effective conservation. Building trust with marginalized communities in participatory acoustic monitoring through dynamic consent. Perceived costs as drivers of wildlife management preferences in rural Tanzanian communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1