Physician Perceptions about the Barriers to Prompt Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.

Q1 Neuroscience International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2019-05-21 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/3637954
Davneet Judge, Jenna Roberts, Rezaul Khandker, Baishali Ambegaonkar, Christopher M Black
{"title":"Physician Perceptions about the Barriers to Prompt Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Davneet Judge,&nbsp;Jenna Roberts,&nbsp;Rezaul Khandker,&nbsp;Baishali Ambegaonkar,&nbsp;Christopher M Black","doi":"10.1155/2019/3637954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior studies have identified numerous barriers to the prompt diagnosis of patients with suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of the study was to evaluate physician's perceptions of the importance of previously identified barriers to diagnosis, but with a specific focus on the presentation of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which may be indicative of neurodegenerative disorders such as AD. A second aim was to evaluate how the perspective of primary care physicians (PCPs) may differ from that of specialists. A cross-sectional online survey of PCPs and specialists who routinely manage patients with complaints of age-related cognitive impairment was conducted. Participants were asked to identify barriers to prompt diagnosis from prespecified lists of known diagnostic challenges categorized into 4 domains: patient-related, physician-related, setting-related, and those relating to the clinical profile of AD. Physicians report a range of barriers when attempting to diagnose MCI and AD. Major themes included patients seeing cognitive decline as a normal part of aging and not disclosing symptoms, long waiting lists, and a lack of treatment options and definitive biomarker tests. Generally, PCPs and specialists showed broad agreement; however, PCPs were more likely to identify burdens on the healthcare system, such as long waiting lists and inadequate time to evaluate patients. Substantial barriers continue to hinder early diagnosis of MCI and AD. There are numerous areas where improvements might be made but the implementation of potential interventions will likely be associated with financial strain for many healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":13802,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"2019 ","pages":"3637954"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/3637954","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3637954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Prior studies have identified numerous barriers to the prompt diagnosis of patients with suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of the study was to evaluate physician's perceptions of the importance of previously identified barriers to diagnosis, but with a specific focus on the presentation of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which may be indicative of neurodegenerative disorders such as AD. A second aim was to evaluate how the perspective of primary care physicians (PCPs) may differ from that of specialists. A cross-sectional online survey of PCPs and specialists who routinely manage patients with complaints of age-related cognitive impairment was conducted. Participants were asked to identify barriers to prompt diagnosis from prespecified lists of known diagnostic challenges categorized into 4 domains: patient-related, physician-related, setting-related, and those relating to the clinical profile of AD. Physicians report a range of barriers when attempting to diagnose MCI and AD. Major themes included patients seeing cognitive decline as a normal part of aging and not disclosing symptoms, long waiting lists, and a lack of treatment options and definitive biomarker tests. Generally, PCPs and specialists showed broad agreement; however, PCPs were more likely to identify burdens on the healthcare system, such as long waiting lists and inadequate time to evaluate patients. Substantial barriers continue to hinder early diagnosis of MCI and AD. There are numerous areas where improvements might be made but the implementation of potential interventions will likely be associated with financial strain for many healthcare systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对及时诊断轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病障碍的认识。
先前的研究已经确定了许多障碍,以迅速诊断疑似阿尔茨海默病(AD)的患者。该研究的目的是评估医生对先前确定的诊断障碍的重要性的认识,但特别关注轻度认知障碍(MCI)的表现,这可能是神经退行性疾病(如AD)的指示。第二个目的是评估初级保健医生(pcp)的观点与专家的观点有何不同。一项横断面在线调查进行了pcp和专家谁常规管理患者的投诉年龄相关的认知障碍。参与者被要求从预先指定的已知诊断挑战列表中识别出快速诊断的障碍,这些挑战分为4个领域:与患者相关的,与医生相关的,与环境相关的,以及与AD临床特征相关的。在试图诊断轻度认知障碍和AD时,医生报告了一系列障碍。主要主题包括患者将认知能力下降视为衰老的正常部分,而不透露症状,漫长的等待名单,缺乏治疗选择和明确的生物标志物测试。一般来说,pcp和专家表现出广泛的共识;然而,pcp更有可能确定医疗保健系统的负担,例如漫长的等待名单和评估患者的时间不足。大量障碍继续阻碍MCI和AD的早期诊断。有许多领域可以改进,但潜在干预措施的实施可能与许多卫生保健系统的财政紧张有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inflammatory Manifestations Associated With Gut Dysbiosis in Alzheimer's Disease. Advancements and Challenges in Antiamyloid Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Novel Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease: Plasma Neurofilament Light and Cerebrospinal Fluid In Silico Investigation of Novel Compounds as Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Diseases In Silico Investigation of Novel Compounds as Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1