Rehabilitation for People Living with Dementia: A Scoping Review of Processes and Outcomes.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2019-06-02 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/4141050
Maiken B Ravn, Kirsten S Petersen, Jette Thuesen
{"title":"Rehabilitation for People Living with Dementia: A Scoping Review of Processes and Outcomes.","authors":"Maiken B Ravn,&nbsp;Kirsten S Petersen,&nbsp;Jette Thuesen","doi":"10.1155/2019/4141050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this scoping review was to map intervention studies of rehabilitation for people living with dementia regarding processes and outcomes, with a particular focus on whether the intervention is person-centred, home-based, or organised adopting a multidisciplinary approach and measures outcomes relating to everyday functioning and well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane. Studies from 2005 to November 2018 were collected and screened for relevance and quality. Randomised control trials and prospective cohort trials reporting a statistically significant effect on one or more outcome measures were included. Included studies were mapped according to selected processes and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six intervention studies were included and mapped. Nineteen of the interventions were person-centred, nine were home-based, and 14 reported a multidisciplinary approach. Twelve of the interventions had activities of daily living as an outcome measure, and 14 had quality of life as an outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Person-centredness appears in most rehabilitation interventions for people living with dementia. Other processes and outcomes are heterogeneously described in the research literature. Rehabilitation programmes can be home-based or take place at a centre. Although not exclusive, the organisation of rehabilitation can be multidisciplinary. Fewer than half of the intervention studies measure the impact on activities of daily living and quality of life. Future guidelines must take into account the weak evidence regarding these aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2019 ","pages":"4141050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/4141050","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4141050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this scoping review was to map intervention studies of rehabilitation for people living with dementia regarding processes and outcomes, with a particular focus on whether the intervention is person-centred, home-based, or organised adopting a multidisciplinary approach and measures outcomes relating to everyday functioning and well-being.

Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane. Studies from 2005 to November 2018 were collected and screened for relevance and quality. Randomised control trials and prospective cohort trials reporting a statistically significant effect on one or more outcome measures were included. Included studies were mapped according to selected processes and outcome measures.

Results: Twenty-six intervention studies were included and mapped. Nineteen of the interventions were person-centred, nine were home-based, and 14 reported a multidisciplinary approach. Twelve of the interventions had activities of daily living as an outcome measure, and 14 had quality of life as an outcome measure.

Conclusion: Person-centredness appears in most rehabilitation interventions for people living with dementia. Other processes and outcomes are heterogeneously described in the research literature. Rehabilitation programmes can be home-based or take place at a centre. Although not exclusive, the organisation of rehabilitation can be multidisciplinary. Fewer than half of the intervention studies measure the impact on activities of daily living and quality of life. Future guidelines must take into account the weak evidence regarding these aspects.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者的康复:过程和结果的范围审查。
目的:本综述的目的是绘制痴呆症患者康复的干预研究的过程和结果,特别关注干预是以人为中心的,以家庭为基础的,还是采用多学科方法组织的,并测量与日常功能和福祉相关的结果。方法:系统检索PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Embase、Cochrane等电子数据库。收集2005年至2018年11月的研究,并对其相关性和质量进行筛选。随机对照试验和前瞻性队列试验报告对一项或多项结果测量有统计学显著影响。纳入的研究是根据选定的过程和结果测量绘制的。结果:纳入并绘制了26项干预研究。其中19项干预措施以人为本,9项以家庭为基础,14项采用多学科方法。其中12项干预措施将日常生活活动作为结果衡量标准,14项干预措施将生活质量作为结果衡量标准。结论:以人为中心在大多数痴呆患者康复干预中出现。研究文献中对其他过程和结果的描述各不相同。康复方案可以以家庭为基础,也可以在中心进行。虽然不是排他性的,但康复的组织可以是多学科的。不到一半的干预研究测量了对日常生活活动和生活质量的影响。未来的指导方针必须考虑到这些方面的薄弱证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Changes in Barriers and Facilitators for Physical Activity during the Retirement Transition: A Qualitative Interview Study Based on the Behavior Change Wheel. Nurses' Perspectives and Understanding of Sarcopenia in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Lack of Intensity Control during an Exercise Program Is Related to a Limited Effect on Variables Responsible for Blood Pressure Regulation in Hypertensive Older Adults. Sleep Quality and Subjective Cognitive Decline among Older Adults: The Mediating Role of Anxiety/Depression and Worries. Effects of Mind-Body Qigong Exercise on Overall Health, Fatigue/Sleep, and Cognition in Older Chinese Immigrants in the US: An Intervention Study with Control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1