{"title":"Men's perceptions of the impact of the physical consequences of a radical prostatectomy on their quality of life: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Deborah Edwards, Judith Carrier","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A qualitative systematic review was carried out to identify men's perceptions of the impact of the physical consequences of a radicalized prostatectomy on their quality of life (QOL). The review included men of all ages and nationalities who had radicalized prostatectomy as treatment for all stages of prostate cancer. Inclusion criteria were studies that investigated the physical consequences of radicalized prostatectomy and its impact on QOL and life experience as identified by the men and the psychosocial implications of the identified physical consequences of radicalized prostatectomy as identified by the men. A search across six databases aimed to find English language studies (November 2017). Critical appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal instrument for qualitative studies. Nineteen qualitative studies were included and the findings are presented as five aggregated qualitative syntheses.Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are significant side-effects of radicalized prostatectomy that have a negative impact on men's QOL for which they feel ill prepared. Men are often reluctant to discuss their emotions and therefore the need to create suitable opportunities for them to express their feelings in conjunction with appropriate evidence-based emotional support and advice is pivotal to the development of support interventions. This review highlights the importance of men being made aware of the impact the physical effects that radicalized prostatectomy can have on their QOL and that those who select radicalized prostatectomy as a treatment strategy must be provided with appropriate information and support from healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55996,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","volume":"17 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S41-S42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000192","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
A qualitative systematic review was carried out to identify men's perceptions of the impact of the physical consequences of a radicalized prostatectomy on their quality of life (QOL). The review included men of all ages and nationalities who had radicalized prostatectomy as treatment for all stages of prostate cancer. Inclusion criteria were studies that investigated the physical consequences of radicalized prostatectomy and its impact on QOL and life experience as identified by the men and the psychosocial implications of the identified physical consequences of radicalized prostatectomy as identified by the men. A search across six databases aimed to find English language studies (November 2017). Critical appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal instrument for qualitative studies. Nineteen qualitative studies were included and the findings are presented as five aggregated qualitative syntheses.Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are significant side-effects of radicalized prostatectomy that have a negative impact on men's QOL for which they feel ill prepared. Men are often reluctant to discuss their emotions and therefore the need to create suitable opportunities for them to express their feelings in conjunction with appropriate evidence-based emotional support and advice is pivotal to the development of support interventions. This review highlights the importance of men being made aware of the impact the physical effects that radicalized prostatectomy can have on their QOL and that those who select radicalized prostatectomy as a treatment strategy must be provided with appropriate information and support from healthcare professionals.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare is the official journal of the Joanna Briggs Institute. It is a fully refereed journal that publishes manuscripts relating to evidence-based medicine and evidence-based practice. It publishes papers containing reliable evidence to assist health professionals in their evaluation and decision-making, and to inform health professionals, students and researchers of outcomes, debates and developments in evidence-based medicine and healthcare.
The journal provides a unique home for publication of systematic reviews (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, economic, scoping and prevalence) and implementation projects including the synthesis, transfer and utilisation of evidence in clinical practice. Original scholarly work relating to the synthesis (translation science), transfer (distribution) and utilization (implementation science and evaluation) of evidence to inform multidisciplinary healthcare practice is considered for publication. The journal also publishes original scholarly commentary pieces relating to the generation and synthesis of evidence for practice and quality improvement, the use and evaluation of evidence in practice, and the process of conducting systematic reviews (methodology) which covers quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, economic, scoping and prevalence methods. In addition, the journal’s content includes implementation projects including the transfer and utilisation of evidence in clinical practice as well as providing a forum for the debate of issues surrounding evidence-based healthcare.