Gender, economics and culture: diversity and the international evolution of smoking prevalence.

Andy R A Stevens, Woody Caan
{"title":"Gender, economics and culture: diversity and the international evolution of smoking prevalence.","authors":"Andy R A Stevens,&nbsp;Woody Caan","doi":"10.1177/1466424008089799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine whether the observed diversity between national patterns of smoking prevalence could require modification of the World Health Organization (WHO) linear model for an international 'smoking pandemic' (a worldwide epidemic) to address data from non-western countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted secondary research using current measures in three publicly available databases: Globalink, the International Labour Organization and the World Bank (all Internet-accessible). The measures we used are the separate percentage data for men and women on: smoking and employment and national income per capita (US$) and percentage growth per annum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis showed that women smokers were more frequent in countries with higher national income, but women were less likely to smoke in countries of rapid growth. Men were less likely to smoke in countries with higher national income, but more likely to smoke in countries of rapid growth. Two principle components together explained 62% of all the variance in the international data. The largest factor was positively correlated with the percentage of employed females, the percentage of female smokers and national income per capita, but negatively correlated with the percentage of male smokers and percentage annual. growth. The effect of female employment was not continuous, but above a threshold of 51%, was associated with a higher prevalence of female smoking. The smaller, second factor was only weakly correlated with any smoking variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In his 1994 model (subsequently adopted by the WHO) Lopez looked at historical trends in 'stages' of smoking prevalence. These have been associated with 'stages' of economic development. We extended this analysis to look at a dynamic change (% annual growth) and a social indicator (employment). Male and female smoking is affected differentially by economic change and by level of income. These are also strongly related to the percentage of women in employment. This has implications for workplace policies on smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":22790,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","volume":"128 3","pages":"113-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1466424008089799","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424008089799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aims: To examine whether the observed diversity between national patterns of smoking prevalence could require modification of the World Health Organization (WHO) linear model for an international 'smoking pandemic' (a worldwide epidemic) to address data from non-western countries.

Method: We conducted secondary research using current measures in three publicly available databases: Globalink, the International Labour Organization and the World Bank (all Internet-accessible). The measures we used are the separate percentage data for men and women on: smoking and employment and national income per capita (US$) and percentage growth per annum.

Results: Regression analysis showed that women smokers were more frequent in countries with higher national income, but women were less likely to smoke in countries of rapid growth. Men were less likely to smoke in countries with higher national income, but more likely to smoke in countries of rapid growth. Two principle components together explained 62% of all the variance in the international data. The largest factor was positively correlated with the percentage of employed females, the percentage of female smokers and national income per capita, but negatively correlated with the percentage of male smokers and percentage annual. growth. The effect of female employment was not continuous, but above a threshold of 51%, was associated with a higher prevalence of female smoking. The smaller, second factor was only weakly correlated with any smoking variables.

Conclusions: In his 1994 model (subsequently adopted by the WHO) Lopez looked at historical trends in 'stages' of smoking prevalence. These have been associated with 'stages' of economic development. We extended this analysis to look at a dynamic change (% annual growth) and a social indicator (employment). Male and female smoking is affected differentially by economic change and by level of income. These are also strongly related to the percentage of women in employment. This has implications for workplace policies on smoking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别、经济和文化:多样性和吸烟流行的国际演变。
目的:研究观察到的各国吸烟流行模式之间的差异是否需要修改世界卫生组织(WHO)关于国际“吸烟大流行”(全球流行病)的线性模型,以处理来自非西方国家的数据。方法:我们使用三个公开可用的数据库:Globalink、国际劳工组织和世界银行(均可上网)的现行措施进行了二次研究。我们使用的方法是男性和女性在吸烟、就业、人均国民收入(美元)和每年增长百分比方面的单独百分比数据。结果:回归分析显示,女性吸烟者在国民收入较高的国家更为频繁,但在经济快速增长的国家,女性吸烟的可能性较小。在国民收入较高的国家,男性吸烟的可能性较小,但在经济快速增长的国家,男性吸烟的可能性更大。两个主要成分共同解释了62%的国际数据差异。最大的影响因素与女性就业百分比、女性吸烟者百分比和国民人均收入呈正相关,与男性吸烟者百分比和年吸烟率负相关。增长。女性就业的影响不是持续的,但超过51%的阈值,与女性吸烟率较高有关。第二个较小的因素与任何吸烟变量的相关性都很弱。结论:在1994年的模型(随后被世界卫生组织采用)中,洛佩兹观察了吸烟流行“阶段”的历史趋势。这些都与经济发展的“阶段”有关。我们将这一分析扩展到动态变化(年增长率)和社会指标(就业)。男性和女性吸烟受到经济变化和收入水平的不同影响。这些也与妇女就业的百分比密切相关。这对工作场所的吸烟政策有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trust me I'm a doctor (or an art therapist or a biomedical scientist or a chiropodist .....). Policy and politics. Will new regulations reverse the 'drop' in homeopathy? The number of people buying medicine online. Regulating the health and social care sector--are we getting there?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1