Phylogenetic re-evaluation of Thielavia with the introduction of a new family Podosporaceae

IF 14.1 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Studies in Mycology Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.simyco.2019.08.002
X.W. Wang , F.Y. Bai , K. Bensch , M. Meijer , B.D. Sun , Y.F. Han , P.W. Crous , R.A. Samson , F.Y. Yang , J. Houbraken
{"title":"Phylogenetic re-evaluation of Thielavia with the introduction of a new family Podosporaceae","authors":"X.W. Wang ,&nbsp;F.Y. Bai ,&nbsp;K. Bensch ,&nbsp;M. Meijer ,&nbsp;B.D. Sun ,&nbsp;Y.F. Han ,&nbsp;P.W. Crous ,&nbsp;R.A. Samson ,&nbsp;F.Y. Yang ,&nbsp;J. Houbraken","doi":"10.1016/j.simyco.2019.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The genus <em>Thielavia</em> is morphologically defined by having non-ostiolate ascomata with a thin peridium composed of <em>textura epidermoidea</em>, and smooth, single-celled, pigmented ascospores with one germ pore. <em>Thielavia</em> is typified with <em>Th. basicola</em> that grows in close association with a hyphomycete which was traditionally identified as <em>Thielaviopsis basicola</em>. Besides <em>Th. basicola</em> exhibiting the mycoparasitic nature, the majority of the described <em>Thielavia</em> species are from soil, and some have economic and ecological importance. Unfortunately, no living type material of <em>Th. basicola</em> exists, hindering a proper understanding of the classification of <em>Thielavia</em>. Therefore, <em>Thielavia basicola</em> was neotypified by material of a mycoparasite presenting the same ecology and morphology as described in the original description. We subsequently performed a multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (<em>rpb2</em>, <em>tub2</em>, ITS and LSU) to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of the species currently recognised in <em>Thielavia</em>. Our results demonstrate that <em>Thielavia</em> is highly polyphyletic, being related to three family-level lineages in two orders. The redefined genus <em>Thielavia</em> is restricted to its type species, <em>Th. basicola</em>, which belongs to the <em>Ceratostomataceae</em> (<em>Melanosporales</em>) and its host is demonstrated to be <em>Berkeleyomyces rouxiae</em>, one of the two species in the “<em>Thielaviopsis basicola</em>” species complex. The new family <em>Podosporaceae</em> is sister to the <em>Chaetomiaceae</em> in the <em>Sordariales</em> and accommodates the re-defined genera <em>Podospora</em>, <em>Trangularia</em> and <em>Cladorrhinum</em>, with the last genus including two former <em>Thielavia</em> species (<em>Th. hyalocarpa</em> and <em>Th. intermedia</em>). This family also includes the genetic model species <em>Podospora anserina</em>, which was combined in <em>Triangularia</em> (as <em>Triangularia anserina</em>). The remaining <em>Thielavia</em> species fall in ten unrelated clades in the <em>Chaetomiaceae</em>, leading to the proposal of nine new genera (<em>Carteria</em>, <em>Chrysanthotrichum</em>, <em>Condenascus</em>, <em>Hyalosphaerella</em>, <em>Microthielavia</em>, <em>Parathielavia</em>, <em>Pseudothielavia</em>, <em>Stolonocarpus</em> and <em>Thermothielavioides</em>). The genus <em>Canariomyces</em> is transferred from <em>Microascaceae</em> (<em>Microascales</em>) to <em>Chaetomiaceae</em> based on its type species <em>Can. notabilis</em>. <em>Canariomyces</em> is closely related to the human-pathogenic genus <em>Madurella</em>, and includes three thielavia-like species and one novel species. Three monotypic genera with a chaetomium-like morph (<em>Brachychaeta, Chrysocorona</em> and <em>Floropilus</em>) are introduced to better resolve the <em>Chaetomiaceae</em> and the thielavia-like species in the family. <em>Chrysocorona lucknowensis</em> and <em>Brachychaeta variospora</em> are closely related to <em>Acrophialophora</em> and three newly introduced genera containing thielavia-like species; <em>Floropilus chiversii</em> is closely related to the industrially important and thermophilic species <em>Thermothielavioides terrestris</em> (syn. <em>Th. terrestris</em>). This study shows that the thielavia-like morph is a homoplastic form that originates from several separate evolutionary events. Furthermore, our results provide new insights into the taxonomy of <em>Sordariales</em> and the polyphyletic <em>Lasiosphaeriaceae</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22036,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Mycology","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 155-252"},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.simyco.2019.08.002","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166061619300107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

The genus Thielavia is morphologically defined by having non-ostiolate ascomata with a thin peridium composed of textura epidermoidea, and smooth, single-celled, pigmented ascospores with one germ pore. Thielavia is typified with Th. basicola that grows in close association with a hyphomycete which was traditionally identified as Thielaviopsis basicola. Besides Th. basicola exhibiting the mycoparasitic nature, the majority of the described Thielavia species are from soil, and some have economic and ecological importance. Unfortunately, no living type material of Th. basicola exists, hindering a proper understanding of the classification of Thielavia. Therefore, Thielavia basicola was neotypified by material of a mycoparasite presenting the same ecology and morphology as described in the original description. We subsequently performed a multi-gene phylogenetic analyses (rpb2, tub2, ITS and LSU) to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of the species currently recognised in Thielavia. Our results demonstrate that Thielavia is highly polyphyletic, being related to three family-level lineages in two orders. The redefined genus Thielavia is restricted to its type species, Th. basicola, which belongs to the Ceratostomataceae (Melanosporales) and its host is demonstrated to be Berkeleyomyces rouxiae, one of the two species in the “Thielaviopsis basicola” species complex. The new family Podosporaceae is sister to the Chaetomiaceae in the Sordariales and accommodates the re-defined genera Podospora, Trangularia and Cladorrhinum, with the last genus including two former Thielavia species (Th. hyalocarpa and Th. intermedia). This family also includes the genetic model species Podospora anserina, which was combined in Triangularia (as Triangularia anserina). The remaining Thielavia species fall in ten unrelated clades in the Chaetomiaceae, leading to the proposal of nine new genera (Carteria, Chrysanthotrichum, Condenascus, Hyalosphaerella, Microthielavia, Parathielavia, Pseudothielavia, Stolonocarpus and Thermothielavioides). The genus Canariomyces is transferred from Microascaceae (Microascales) to Chaetomiaceae based on its type species Can. notabilis. Canariomyces is closely related to the human-pathogenic genus Madurella, and includes three thielavia-like species and one novel species. Three monotypic genera with a chaetomium-like morph (Brachychaeta, Chrysocorona and Floropilus) are introduced to better resolve the Chaetomiaceae and the thielavia-like species in the family. Chrysocorona lucknowensis and Brachychaeta variospora are closely related to Acrophialophora and three newly introduced genera containing thielavia-like species; Floropilus chiversii is closely related to the industrially important and thermophilic species Thermothielavioides terrestris (syn. Th. terrestris). This study shows that the thielavia-like morph is a homoplastic form that originates from several separate evolutionary events. Furthermore, our results provide new insights into the taxonomy of Sordariales and the polyphyletic Lasiosphaeriaceae.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以一新科Podosporaceae为例,对铁蕨属植物系统发育的重新评价
在形态上定义为具有非卵形的子囊,具有由表皮层结构组成的薄包皮,以及光滑的单细胞着色的子囊孢子,具有一个胚芽孔。Thielavia以Th为代表。与一种菌丝菌密切相关的柱头菌,传统上被鉴定为柱头菌。除了Th。本研究所描述的大部分飞蛾属植物都来自土壤,其中一些具有重要的经济和生态意义。不幸的是,没有生命类型的材料。basicola存在,阻碍了对Thielavia分类的正确理解。因此,木蠹蛾是由一种与原始描述中具有相同生态和形态的支寄生虫材料新型化的。随后,我们进行了多基因系统发育分析(rpb2, tub2, ITS和LSU),以解决目前在Thielavia发现的物种的系统发育关系。我们的研究结果表明,Thielavia是高度多系的,与两个目的三个家庭水平的谱系有关。重新定义的属被限制在它的模式种,Thielavia。basicola属于角鼻藓科(黑孢门),其寄主为berkelyomyces rouxiae,是“Thielaviopsis basicola”物种复合体中的两个种之一。新的Podosporaceae科是Sordariales毛囊科的姐妹科,包括重新定义的Podospora属,Trangularia属和Cladorrhinum属,最后一个属包括两个前Thielavia物种(Th。透明质脂和Th。媒介物)。该科还包括遗传模式种鹿角孢虫(Podospora anserina),该遗传模式种组合在Triangularia anserina中。其余的Thielavia属属于毛囊科10个不相关的分支,导致9个新属(Carteria, Chrysanthotrichum, Condenascus, Hyalosphaerella, Microthielavia, Parathielavia, Pseudothielavia, Stolonocarpus和Thermothielavioides)的提出。Canariomyces属根据其模式种Can从Microascaceae (Microascales)转移到Chaetomiaceae。notabilis。Canariomyces与人类致病属Madurella有密切关系,包括3个类噻虫属和1个新种。为了更好地区分毛藻科和thielavia类,本文引入了3个具有毛藻样形态的单型属(Brachychaeta, Chrysocorona和Floropilus)。lucknowensis和Brachychaeta variospora与Acrophialophora和3个新引入的包含thielavia样种的属关系密切;Floropilus chiversii与工业上重要的嗜热物种thermothielaviides terrestris(同上)密切相关。terrestris)。这项研究表明,类似于thielavia的形态是一种同源形态,起源于几个独立的进化事件。此外,我们的研究结果为Sordariales和多系的Lasiosphaeriaceae的分类提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Mycology
Studies in Mycology 生物-真菌学
CiteScore
35.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The international journal Studies in Mycology focuses on advancing the understanding of filamentous fungi, yeasts, and various aspects of mycology. It publishes comprehensive systematic monographs as well as topical issues covering a wide range of subjects including biotechnology, ecology, molecular biology, pathology, and systematics. This Open-Access journal offers unrestricted access to its content. Each issue of Studies in Mycology consists of around 5 to 6 papers, either in the form of monographs or special focused topics. Unlike traditional length restrictions, the journal encourages submissions of manuscripts with a minimum of 50 A4 pages in print. This ensures a thorough exploration and presentation of the research findings, maximizing the depth of the published work.
期刊最新文献
What are the 100 most cited fungal genera? The genus Fomitopsis (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) reconsidered. Worldwide forest surveys reveal forty-three new species in Phytophthora major Clade 2 with fundamental implications for the evolution and biogeography of the genus and global plant biosecurity. Family matters inside the order Agaricales: systematic reorganization and classification of incertae sedis clitocyboid, pleurotoid and tricholomatoid taxa based on an updated 6-gene phylogeny A review of recently introduced Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and other Eurotiales species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1