Iliac venous stenting for outflow obstruction does not significantly change the quality of life of patients with severe chronic venous insufficiency.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2019-11-26 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2048004019890968
Alexander Shiferson, Edouard Aboian, Michael Shih, Qinghua Pu, Theresa Jacob, Robert Y Rhee
{"title":"Iliac venous stenting for outflow obstruction does not significantly change the quality of life of patients with severe chronic venous insufficiency.","authors":"Alexander Shiferson,&nbsp;Edouard Aboian,&nbsp;Michael Shih,&nbsp;Qinghua Pu,&nbsp;Theresa Jacob,&nbsp;Robert Y Rhee","doi":"10.1177/2048004019890968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Percutaneous endovenous iliac stenting has emerged as a new modality in the treatment of advanced chronic venous insufficiency with outflow obstruction. However, the effect of this intervention on the quality of life remains unclear. We examined the impact of iliac venous stenting for outflow obstruction as compared to conservative medical management on the quality of life in severe chronic venous insufficiency patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of all patients with CEAP class 5 and 6 disease (N = 172) who underwent ilio-caval venography with intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) at a single institution over a seven-year period, were reviewed for this case-control study. Quality of life evaluation was performed utilizing the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) one year after the index procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 172 severe chronic venous insufficiency patients, 109 were stented and 63 patients were treated medically based on their venography and IVUS results. The indication for stenting was confirmation of IVUS determined surface area or diameter outflow stenosis of greater than 50% within the common or external iliac venous systems. Eighty patients (47%) responded with completed CIVIQ-20 questionnaires for analysis. Of these, 47 were from the stented group and 33 from the non-stented group. At least moderate persistent pain or discomfort post-procedure was reported by 20 (43%) stented group patients and 19 (58%) non-stented group patients. Scores for all the other criteria in the CIVIQ-20 were similar between the groups. The mean total CIVIQ-20 score was 45.23 and 47.13, respectively, in stented group and non-stented group patients. (<i>p</i> = 0.678).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in the quality of life reported by CEAP 5 and 6 patients who underwent iliac venous stenting versus those who were treated medically for presumed iliac outflow obstruction. Prospective studies are needed to determine the true value of iliac venous stenting based on IVUS criteria in the management advanced chronic venous insufficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"8 ","pages":"2048004019890968"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2048004019890968","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004019890968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous endovenous iliac stenting has emerged as a new modality in the treatment of advanced chronic venous insufficiency with outflow obstruction. However, the effect of this intervention on the quality of life remains unclear. We examined the impact of iliac venous stenting for outflow obstruction as compared to conservative medical management on the quality of life in severe chronic venous insufficiency patients.

Methods: Medical records of all patients with CEAP class 5 and 6 disease (N = 172) who underwent ilio-caval venography with intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) at a single institution over a seven-year period, were reviewed for this case-control study. Quality of life evaluation was performed utilizing the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) one year after the index procedure.

Results: Of the 172 severe chronic venous insufficiency patients, 109 were stented and 63 patients were treated medically based on their venography and IVUS results. The indication for stenting was confirmation of IVUS determined surface area or diameter outflow stenosis of greater than 50% within the common or external iliac venous systems. Eighty patients (47%) responded with completed CIVIQ-20 questionnaires for analysis. Of these, 47 were from the stented group and 33 from the non-stented group. At least moderate persistent pain or discomfort post-procedure was reported by 20 (43%) stented group patients and 19 (58%) non-stented group patients. Scores for all the other criteria in the CIVIQ-20 were similar between the groups. The mean total CIVIQ-20 score was 45.23 and 47.13, respectively, in stented group and non-stented group patients. (p = 0.678).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the quality of life reported by CEAP 5 and 6 patients who underwent iliac venous stenting versus those who were treated medically for presumed iliac outflow obstruction. Prospective studies are needed to determine the true value of iliac venous stenting based on IVUS criteria in the management advanced chronic venous insufficiency.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髂静脉支架治疗流出梗阻对严重慢性静脉功能不全患者的生活质量无显著影响。
目的:经皮髂内静脉支架置入术是治疗晚期慢性静脉功能不全伴流出梗阻的一种新方法。然而,这种干预对生活质量的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了髂静脉支架治疗流出梗阻与保守治疗对严重慢性静脉功能不全患者生活质量的影响。方法:本病例对照研究回顾了在同一医院接受髂腔静脉造影和血管内超声检查(IVUS)的所有CEAP 5级和6级疾病患者(N = 172) 7年期间的病历。生活质量评估采用慢性静脉功能不全生活质量问卷(CIVIQ-20)在指数程序后一年。结果:172例重症慢性静脉功能不全患者中,109例接受支架治疗,63例根据静脉造影和IVUS结果进行药物治疗。在髂总静脉系统或髂外静脉系统内,IVUS确定的流出口面积或直径狭窄大于50%时,支架植入术的适应症得到确认。80例患者(47%)填写了完整的CIVIQ-20问卷进行分析。其中支架组47例,非支架组33例。20例(43%)支架组患者和19例(58%)非支架组患者报告了术后至少中度持续疼痛或不适。CIVIQ-20中所有其他标准的得分在两组之间是相似的。支架组和非支架组患者的平均总分civq -20分别为45.23分和47.13分。(p = 0.678)。结论:CEAP 5和6报告的髂静脉支架置入术患者与因推定髂流出梗阻而接受医学治疗的患者的生活质量无显著差异。需要前瞻性研究来确定基于IVUS标准的髂静脉支架在治疗晚期慢性静脉功能不全中的真正价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biplane 3D overlay guidance for congenital heart disease to assist cardiac catheterization interventions-A pilot study. Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis. Metabolic syndrome and its associated factors among adults with cardiac diseases: A cross-sectional comparative group study. Causal roles of immune cells in cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Associations of variability in body mass index with cardiovascular outcomes in the general population: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1