Agreement Between Structured Descriptive Assessments and Functional Analyses Conducted Over a Telehealth System.

Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2019-11-01 Epub Date: 2019-01-28 DOI:10.1037/bar0000153
Brian K Martens, Emily L Baxter, Jennifer J McComas, Samantha J Sallade, Johanna S Kester, Miguel Caamano, Adele Dimian, Jessica Simacek, Brittany Pennington
{"title":"Agreement Between Structured Descriptive Assessments and Functional Analyses Conducted Over a Telehealth System.","authors":"Brian K Martens, Emily L Baxter, Jennifer J McComas, Samantha J Sallade, Johanna S Kester, Miguel Caamano, Adele Dimian, Jessica Simacek, Brittany Pennington","doi":"10.1037/bar0000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined whether experimental functional analyses (FAs) conducted by parents at home with coaching via telehealth would produce differentiated results, and compared these results to the functions identified from structured descriptive assessments (SDAs) also conducted by parents at home via telehealth. Four boys between the ages of 4- and 8-years old with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their parents participated. All assessments were conducted in the children's homes with their parents serving as intervention agents and with coaching from remote behavior therapists using videoconferencing technology. Parent-implemented FAs produced differentiated results for all 4 children in the study. Overall, analyzing antecedent-behavior (A-B) and behavior-consequence (B-C) relations from the SDA videos identified only half of the functions identified by the FAs. For children whose SDA results were differentiated, analyzing A-B relations correctly identified 4 of 5 functions. Analyzing B-C relations correctly identified 5 of 6 functions identified by the experimental FA, but overidentified attention for all children. Implications for conducting functional analyses and interpreting structured descriptive assessment via telehealth are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72345,"journal":{"name":"Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6944308/pdf/nihms-1062053.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined whether experimental functional analyses (FAs) conducted by parents at home with coaching via telehealth would produce differentiated results, and compared these results to the functions identified from structured descriptive assessments (SDAs) also conducted by parents at home via telehealth. Four boys between the ages of 4- and 8-years old with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their parents participated. All assessments were conducted in the children's homes with their parents serving as intervention agents and with coaching from remote behavior therapists using videoconferencing technology. Parent-implemented FAs produced differentiated results for all 4 children in the study. Overall, analyzing antecedent-behavior (A-B) and behavior-consequence (B-C) relations from the SDA videos identified only half of the functions identified by the FAs. For children whose SDA results were differentiated, analyzing A-B relations correctly identified 4 of 5 functions. Analyzing B-C relations correctly identified 5 of 6 functions identified by the experimental FA, but overidentified attention for all children. Implications for conducting functional analyses and interpreting structured descriptive assessment via telehealth are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过远程医疗系统进行的结构化描述性评估与功能分析之间的一致性。
本研究探讨了父母在家通过远程医疗进行辅导的实验性功能分析(FAs)是否会产生不同的结果,并将这些结果与同样由父母在家通过远程医疗进行的结构化描述性评估(SDAs)所确定的功能进行了比较。四名年龄在 4 至 8 岁之间的智力和发育障碍男孩及其父母参加了此次活动。所有评估均在儿童家中进行,由他们的父母作为干预代理人,并由远程行为治疗师通过视频会议技术进行指导。研究中的所有 4 名儿童在家长实施的 FA 中都取得了不同的结果。总体而言,通过分析自毁行为视频中的前因后果(A-B)和行为后果(B-C)关系,只发现了 FAs 所识别功能的一半。对于 SDA 结果被区分的儿童,分析 A-B 关系能正确识别 5 种功能中的 4 种。分析 B-C 关系能正确识别实验性 FA 所识别的 6 项功能中的 5 项,但对所有儿童的注意力都识别过度了。本文讨论了通过远程医疗进行功能分析和解释结构化描述性评估的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correspondence between data provided by parents and trained observers about challenging behavior. Supplemental Material for Correspondence Between Data Provided by Parents and Trained Observers About Challenging Behavior SΔp: The Missing Discriminative Stimulus for Non-Punishment. Validation of a tablet-based program for skill acquisition research. Aggression and crying as side effects of time-out.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1