Success and Challenge When Returning to Clinical Practice: A Case Series in Anesthesiologist Re-Entry.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2019-12-20 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/3531968
Michael S Green, Usama Iqbal, Christopher R Hoffman, Parmis Green, Nielufar Varjavand
{"title":"Success and Challenge When Returning to Clinical Practice: A Case Series in Anesthesiologist Re-Entry.","authors":"Michael S Green,&nbsp;Usama Iqbal,&nbsp;Christopher R Hoffman,&nbsp;Parmis Green,&nbsp;Nielufar Varjavand","doi":"10.1155/2019/3531968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anesthesiologists returning to clinical practice pose unique challenges for licensing and credentialing boards. Few institutions provide re-education. We describe the physician refresher/re-entry program at our College of Medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We launched the physician re-entry program in 2006. This individualized program re-educates physicians who left clinical practice for any reason and are seeking to return. We report results achieved for 12 anesthesiologists who successfully completed the course between August 2012 and February 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven men and five women left their practices for various reasons, which included relocation, family or medical reasons, substance use, and burnout. None left practice for medical negligence. Range away from clinical activity was 0-10 years. Five had active licenses. Seven were US graduates and five were international. Nine of 12 achieved their goals. Of the 3 others, 1 did not pursue her goal, another did not obtain a residency, and the other just finished the program. Seven out of 9 (78%) achieved their goal within 1 year of course completion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite our small sample size, our experience to successfully return inactive physicians to the workforce adds to the scant literature and experience in refreshing inactive physicians. Our trainees return to practice serving communities across the country and are now a pivotal part of the anesthesiology workforce. Thus, this program not only services individual physicians, but the whole community affected by their absence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2019 ","pages":"3531968"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/3531968","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3531968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Anesthesiologists returning to clinical practice pose unique challenges for licensing and credentialing boards. Few institutions provide re-education. We describe the physician refresher/re-entry program at our College of Medicine.

Methods: We launched the physician re-entry program in 2006. This individualized program re-educates physicians who left clinical practice for any reason and are seeking to return. We report results achieved for 12 anesthesiologists who successfully completed the course between August 2012 and February 2018.

Results: Seven men and five women left their practices for various reasons, which included relocation, family or medical reasons, substance use, and burnout. None left practice for medical negligence. Range away from clinical activity was 0-10 years. Five had active licenses. Seven were US graduates and five were international. Nine of 12 achieved their goals. Of the 3 others, 1 did not pursue her goal, another did not obtain a residency, and the other just finished the program. Seven out of 9 (78%) achieved their goal within 1 year of course completion.

Discussion: Despite our small sample size, our experience to successfully return inactive physicians to the workforce adds to the scant literature and experience in refreshing inactive physicians. Our trainees return to practice serving communities across the country and are now a pivotal part of the anesthesiology workforce. Thus, this program not only services individual physicians, but the whole community affected by their absence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成功与挑战,当回到临床实践:一个案例系列的麻醉师重新进入。
简介:麻醉师回到临床实践提出了独特的挑战许可和资格认证委员会。很少有机构提供再教育。我们将介绍我们医学院的医师进修/再入职计划。方法:我们于2006年启动了医师再入职计划。这个个性化的项目对那些因任何原因离开临床实践并寻求回归的医生进行再教育。我们报告了2012年8月至2018年2月期间成功完成课程的12名麻醉师的结果。结果:7名男性和5名女性因各种原因离职,包括搬迁、家庭或医疗原因、药物使用和倦怠。没有人因医疗过失而离职。与临床活动的距离为0-10年。其中五家拥有有效的执照。其中7名是美国毕业生,5名是国际毕业生。12人中有9人实现了他们的目标。在其他三个人中,一个没有追求她的目标,一个没有获得住院医师资格,另一个刚刚完成课程。9人中有7人(78%)在1年内完成了课程。讨论:尽管我们的样本量很小,但我们成功让不活跃的医生重返工作岗位的经验,增加了在刷新不活跃医生方面缺乏的文献和经验。我们的学员返回实践服务全国各地的社区,现在是麻醉学劳动力的关键部分。因此,这个项目不仅服务于个别医生,也服务于整个因医生缺席而受到影响的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Association Between Neuraxial Anesthesia and Back Pain After Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. On-Pump FIBTEM-A5 Accurately Predicts the A5 Values After Protamine Administration. The Effect of Remimazolam on the Baseline TOF Ratio: A Prospective, Clinical Study. Efficacy of High-Volume Low-Concentration Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Irrigation for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Bupivacaine Irrigation for Analgesia. Association Between MRI Findings of Facet Arthropathy and Synovitis With Health-Related Outcome and Pain Scores Following Therapeutic Lumbar Facet Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1